Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine boosters for reducing COVID-19 mortality among people aged 65 years or older, Australia, August 2023 – February 2024: a retrospective observational cohort study

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bette Liu, Anish Scaria, Sandrine Stepien, Kristine Macartney
{"title":"Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine boosters for reducing COVID-19 mortality among people aged 65 years or older, Australia, August 2023 – February 2024: a retrospective observational cohort study","authors":"Bette Liu,&nbsp;Anish Scaria,&nbsp;Sandrine Stepien,&nbsp;Kristine Macartney","doi":"10.5694/mja2.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effectiveness of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monovalent XBB.1.5 variant vaccine for reducing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality among people aged 65 years or older.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective observational cohort study; analysis of linked 2021 Australian census, Australian Immunisation Register, and death registrations data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Australia, 1 August 2023 to 29 February 2024; dominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants: XBB-related until early December 2023, then the BA.2.86-related JN.1.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>People aged 65 years or older on 1 August 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Relative vaccine effectiveness by time since most recent booster and booster type (XBB.1.5 variant or other), adjusted for age, gender, state/territory, household income, number of medical conditions, number of general practice visits, and influenza vaccination during 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>By 29 February 2024, 1620 COVID-19-specific deaths among 4.12 million people aged 65 years or older had been recorded. COVID-19 mortality was lower among people who had received XBB.1.5 COVID-19 booster doses during the preceding 90 days (21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 9–52] per 100 000 person-years) than among those whose most recent booster had been more than 365 days ago (72 [95% CI, 61–84] per 100 000 person-years). The relative vaccine effectiveness for XBB.1.5 boosters during the preceding 90 days (<i>v</i> any booster &gt; 365 days) was 74.7% (95% CI, 59.9–84.1%); for other booster types it was 51.6% (95% CI, 39.3–61.4%). Relative vaccine effectiveness declined with time: for any booster during the preceding 91–180 days (<i>v</i> any booster &gt; 365 days) it was 31.2% (95% CI, 18.9–41.6%); for any booster during the preceding 181–365 days it was 13.1% (95% CI, 1.8–23.2%). Relative XBB.1.5 vaccine effectiveness was similar in analyses restricted to 1 December 2023 – 29 February 2024, when the dominant Omicron subvariant was JN.1.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Recent booster vaccination with the XBB.1.5 monovalent COVID-19 vaccine was highly effective for preventing COVID-19 deaths among people aged 65 years or older, including during the period in which the JN.1 was the dominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant. Our findings provide support for the recommendation that people aged 65 years or older receive COVID-19 vaccine booster doses every six months.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"223 8","pages":"418-422"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.70015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monovalent XBB.1.5 variant vaccine for reducing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality among people aged 65 years or older.

Study design

Retrospective observational cohort study; analysis of linked 2021 Australian census, Australian Immunisation Register, and death registrations data.

Setting

Australia, 1 August 2023 to 29 February 2024; dominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants: XBB-related until early December 2023, then the BA.2.86-related JN.1.

Participants

People aged 65 years or older on 1 August 2023.

Main outcome measures

Relative vaccine effectiveness by time since most recent booster and booster type (XBB.1.5 variant or other), adjusted for age, gender, state/territory, household income, number of medical conditions, number of general practice visits, and influenza vaccination during 2022.

Results

By 29 February 2024, 1620 COVID-19-specific deaths among 4.12 million people aged 65 years or older had been recorded. COVID-19 mortality was lower among people who had received XBB.1.5 COVID-19 booster doses during the preceding 90 days (21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 9–52] per 100 000 person-years) than among those whose most recent booster had been more than 365 days ago (72 [95% CI, 61–84] per 100 000 person-years). The relative vaccine effectiveness for XBB.1.5 boosters during the preceding 90 days (v any booster > 365 days) was 74.7% (95% CI, 59.9–84.1%); for other booster types it was 51.6% (95% CI, 39.3–61.4%). Relative vaccine effectiveness declined with time: for any booster during the preceding 91–180 days (v any booster > 365 days) it was 31.2% (95% CI, 18.9–41.6%); for any booster during the preceding 181–365 days it was 13.1% (95% CI, 1.8–23.2%). Relative XBB.1.5 vaccine effectiveness was similar in analyses restricted to 1 December 2023 – 29 February 2024, when the dominant Omicron subvariant was JN.1.

Conclusions

Recent booster vaccination with the XBB.1.5 monovalent COVID-19 vaccine was highly effective for preventing COVID-19 deaths among people aged 65 years or older, including during the period in which the JN.1 was the dominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant. Our findings provide support for the recommendation that people aged 65 years or older receive COVID-19 vaccine booster doses every six months.

Abstract Image

2023年8月至2024年2月,澳大利亚,COVID-19疫苗增强剂对降低65岁及以上人群COVID-19死亡率的有效性:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
目的:评价严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)单价XBB.1.5变异体疫苗降低65岁及以上人群2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)死亡率的效果。研究设计:回顾性观察队列研究;对2021年澳大利亚人口普查、澳大利亚免疫登记和死亡登记数据的相关分析。地点:澳大利亚,2023年8月1日至2024年2月29日;主要的SARS-CoV-2 Omicron亚变体:直到2023年12月初与xbb相关,然后是ba .2.86相关的jn1。参与者:2023年8月1日65岁及以上的老年人。主要结局指标:自最近一次增强剂和增强剂类型(XBB.1.5变体或其他)以来按时间划分的相对疫苗有效性,根据年龄、性别、州/地区、家庭收入、医疗条件数量、全科就诊次数和2022年期间的流感疫苗接种进行调整。结果:截至2024年2月29日,在412万65岁及以上的人群中,记录了1620例covid -19特异性死亡。在前90天内接种过XBB.1.5 COVID-19增强剂的人的COVID-19死亡率(21[95%可信区间{CI}, 9-52] / 10万人年)低于最近一次接种超过365天的人(72[95%可信区间{CI}, 61-84] / 10万人年)。前90天XBB.1.5增强剂的相对疫苗有效性(与365天任何增强剂相比)为74.7% (95% CI, 59.9-84.1%);其他增强剂类型为51.6% (95% CI, 39.3-61.4%)。疫苗的相对有效性随着时间的推移而下降:在前91-180天内任何加强剂(vs任何加强剂,365天)为31.2% (95% CI, 18.9-41.6%);在181-365天期间,任何一种强化剂的感染率为13.1% (95% CI, 1.8-23.2%)。在仅限于2023年12月1日至2024年2月29日的分析中,XBB.1.5疫苗的相对有效性相似,当时占优势的欧米克隆亚变体为JN.1。结论:近期加强接种XBB.1.5单价COVID-19疫苗对预防65岁及以上人群的COVID-19死亡非常有效,包括在JN.1为主要SARS-CoV-2 Omicron亚变体期间。我们的研究结果为65岁或以上的人每六个月接种一次COVID-19疫苗加强剂的建议提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信