Real-world health care costs and resource utilization associated with mild cognitive impairment in the United States: A retrospective cohort study of commercial and Medicare data.
Feride H Frech, Gang Li, Timothy R Juday, Yingjie Ding, Soeren Mattke, Ara S Khachaturian, Aaron S Rosenberg, Colette Ndiba-Markey, Andrew Rava, Richard Batrla, Susan De Santi, Harald Hampel
{"title":"Real-world health care costs and resource utilization associated with mild cognitive impairment in the United States: A retrospective cohort study of commercial and Medicare data.","authors":"Feride H Frech, Gang Li, Timothy R Juday, Yingjie Ding, Soeren Mattke, Ara S Khachaturian, Aaron S Rosenberg, Colette Ndiba-Markey, Andrew Rava, Richard Batrla, Susan De Santi, Harald Hampel","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8.782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage before Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). The link between AD and increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs is well established but not the economic burden of MCI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the incremental economic burden of individuals with MCI in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study that derived data from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. The observation period was from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2019. Included individuals were (1) aged at least 50 years, (2) had at least 2 years of pre-index (ie, date of their first MCI diagnosis) continuous health plan enrollment, and (3) had at least 1 year of post-index continuous health plan enrollment. Individuals were excluded if they had (1) at least 1 claim with a diagnosis of Parkinson disease at any time during the study period, (2) at least 1 claim with a diagnosis of ADRD at any time before the index date, or (3) at least 1 pharmacy claim for an ADRD medication (donepezil, memantine, memantine/donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine) at any time before the index date. Outcomes included all-cause HCRU and health care costs for incident MCI individuals (MCI cohort) and matched individuals without MCI or dementia (control cohort) during the 12-month follow-up period. Controls were matched at a 3:1 ratio by age, sex, region, and index year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5,185 individuals met the criteria for the MCI cohort and 15,555 for the control cohort. Mean age at baseline was 67 years and 57.7% were female in both cohorts. The MCI cohort had a higher comorbidity burden compared with the control cohort (1.5 vs 1.0 and 2.6 vs 1.8, respectively; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) All comorbidities assessed at baseline were more prevalent in the MCI cohort than in the control. Adjusted all-cause HCRU for all points of service and adjusted all-cause mean costs in total ($32,318 vs $13,894; mean ratio [MR] = 2.33, 95% CI = 2.23-2.43), for emergency department ($4,460 vs $3,849; MR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.08-1.25), outpatient ($16,054 vs $7,265; MR = 2.21, 95% CI = 2.12-2.30), and pharmacy ($5,503 vs $2,933; MR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.78-1.97) (all <i>P</i> < 0.0001) were significantly higher for the MCI cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The economic burden of MCI was more than double that for similar individuals without MCI or dementia. Timely diagnosis and intervention are key to delaying progression to AD and reducing associated costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 8","pages":"782-794"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8.782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage before Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). The link between AD and increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs is well established but not the economic burden of MCI.
Objective: To estimate the incremental economic burden of individuals with MCI in the United States.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that derived data from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. The observation period was from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2019. Included individuals were (1) aged at least 50 years, (2) had at least 2 years of pre-index (ie, date of their first MCI diagnosis) continuous health plan enrollment, and (3) had at least 1 year of post-index continuous health plan enrollment. Individuals were excluded if they had (1) at least 1 claim with a diagnosis of Parkinson disease at any time during the study period, (2) at least 1 claim with a diagnosis of ADRD at any time before the index date, or (3) at least 1 pharmacy claim for an ADRD medication (donepezil, memantine, memantine/donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine) at any time before the index date. Outcomes included all-cause HCRU and health care costs for incident MCI individuals (MCI cohort) and matched individuals without MCI or dementia (control cohort) during the 12-month follow-up period. Controls were matched at a 3:1 ratio by age, sex, region, and index year.
Results: In total, 5,185 individuals met the criteria for the MCI cohort and 15,555 for the control cohort. Mean age at baseline was 67 years and 57.7% were female in both cohorts. The MCI cohort had a higher comorbidity burden compared with the control cohort (1.5 vs 1.0 and 2.6 vs 1.8, respectively; P < 0.0001) All comorbidities assessed at baseline were more prevalent in the MCI cohort than in the control. Adjusted all-cause HCRU for all points of service and adjusted all-cause mean costs in total ($32,318 vs $13,894; mean ratio [MR] = 2.33, 95% CI = 2.23-2.43), for emergency department ($4,460 vs $3,849; MR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.08-1.25), outpatient ($16,054 vs $7,265; MR = 2.21, 95% CI = 2.12-2.30), and pharmacy ($5,503 vs $2,933; MR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.78-1.97) (all P < 0.0001) were significantly higher for the MCI cohort.
Conclusions: The economic burden of MCI was more than double that for similar individuals without MCI or dementia. Timely diagnosis and intervention are key to delaying progression to AD and reducing associated costs.
背景:轻度认知障碍(MCI)是阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆(ADRD)前的过渡阶段。阿尔茨海默病与卫生保健资源利用率增加(HCRU)和成本之间的联系已得到充分证实,但MCI的经济负担尚未确定。目的:估计美国MCI患者的增量经济负担。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,数据来源于MarketScan商业和医疗保险补充数据库。观察期为2014年1月1日至2019年12月31日。纳入的个体(1)年龄至少50岁,(2)指数前(即首次MCI诊断之日)至少有2年连续健康计划登记,以及(3)指数后至少有1年连续健康计划登记。如果个体在研究期间的任何时间有(1)至少1项声称诊断为帕金森病,(2)在索引日期之前的任何时间至少1项声称诊断为ADRD,或(3)在索引日期之前的任何时间至少1项关于ADRD药物(多奈哌齐、美金刚、美金刚/多奈哌齐、加兰他明或利瓦司明)的药房索赔,则将其排除在外。结果包括在12个月的随访期间,发生MCI的个体(MCI队列)和没有MCI或痴呆的匹配个体(对照队列)的全因HCRU和医疗费用。对照按年龄、性别、地区和指标年份按3:1的比例进行匹配。结果:共有5185人符合MCI队列的标准,15555人符合对照队列的标准。基线时的平均年龄为67岁,两个队列中57.7%为女性。MCI队列与对照队列相比,共病负担更高(分别为1.5 vs 1.0和2.6 vs 1.8;结论:轻度认知损伤的经济负担是没有轻度认知损伤或痴呆的类似个体的两倍以上。及时诊断和干预是延缓阿尔茨海默病进展和降低相关费用的关键。
期刊介绍:
JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.