Assessment of intraoperative high frequency variability index as a predictor of postoperative pain after open liver or pancreatic surgery under combined general and epidural anesthesia: a prospective observational study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Keisuke Yoshida, Takahiro Hakozaki, Takayuki Hasegawa, Tatsumi Yakushiji, Yukihiro Fukuhara, Shinju Obara, Satoki Inoue
{"title":"Assessment of intraoperative high frequency variability index as a predictor of postoperative pain after open liver or pancreatic surgery under combined general and epidural anesthesia: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Keisuke Yoshida, Takahiro Hakozaki, Takayuki Hasegawa, Tatsumi Yakushiji, Yukihiro Fukuhara, Shinju Obara, Satoki Inoue","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01332-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to investigate the utility of the intraoperative high frequency variability index (HFVI) / Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) for predicting postoperative pain in patients undergoing open liver or pancreatic surgery under combined general and epidural anesthesia, with a particular focus on HFVI/ANI measured immediately before extubation. We investigated whether maximum postoperative pain at rest and postoperative morphine consumption were associated with intraoperative HFVI/ANI values, including those measured immediately before extubation, the mean intraoperative values, the difference between values immediately before and 5 min after the first administration of local anesthetics via epidural catheter, and the difference between values immediately before and 5 min after the start of surgery. We analyzed the data obtained from 52 patients and found that HFVI/ANI measured immediately before extubation showed a limited but statistically significant association with postoperative pain at rest. However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis failed to demonstrate clinically useful predictive performance of HFVI/ANI for postoperative pain defined as Numerical Rating Scale > 3 or > 7. In addition, no association was observed between intraoperative HFVI/ANI measured at any time point and postoperative morphine consumption. The present study demonstrated that intraoperative HFVI/ANI may reflect postoperative pain levels to a limited extent, particularly when measured immediately before extubation, but lacks sufficient accuracy to be used as a standalone predictor of postoperative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01332-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the utility of the intraoperative high frequency variability index (HFVI) / Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) for predicting postoperative pain in patients undergoing open liver or pancreatic surgery under combined general and epidural anesthesia, with a particular focus on HFVI/ANI measured immediately before extubation. We investigated whether maximum postoperative pain at rest and postoperative morphine consumption were associated with intraoperative HFVI/ANI values, including those measured immediately before extubation, the mean intraoperative values, the difference between values immediately before and 5 min after the first administration of local anesthetics via epidural catheter, and the difference between values immediately before and 5 min after the start of surgery. We analyzed the data obtained from 52 patients and found that HFVI/ANI measured immediately before extubation showed a limited but statistically significant association with postoperative pain at rest. However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis failed to demonstrate clinically useful predictive performance of HFVI/ANI for postoperative pain defined as Numerical Rating Scale > 3 or > 7. In addition, no association was observed between intraoperative HFVI/ANI measured at any time point and postoperative morphine consumption. The present study demonstrated that intraoperative HFVI/ANI may reflect postoperative pain levels to a limited extent, particularly when measured immediately before extubation, but lacks sufficient accuracy to be used as a standalone predictor of postoperative pain.

评估术中高频变异性指数作为全麻和硬膜外联合麻醉下开放肝脏或胰腺手术后疼痛的预测指标:一项前瞻性观察研究。
本研究的目的是探讨术中高频变异性指数(HFVI) /镇痛痛觉指数(ANI)在预测全麻和硬膜外联合麻醉下开放肝脏或胰腺手术患者术后疼痛方面的应用,特别关注拔管前立即测量的HFVI/ANI。我们调查了术后休息时最大疼痛和术后吗啡用量是否与术中HFVI/ANI值相关,包括拔管前立即测量的值、术中平均值、首次通过硬膜外导管局部麻醉前和5分钟的值差、手术开始前和5分钟的值差。我们分析了52例患者的数据,发现拔管前立即测量的HFVI/ANI与术后静息疼痛有有限但统计学意义显著的关联。然而,受试者工作特征曲线分析未能证明HFVI/ANI对术后疼痛的临床有用预测性能,其定义为数值评定量表bbbb3或bbbb7。此外,术中任何时间点测量的HFVI/ANI与术后吗啡消耗之间没有关联。目前的研究表明,术中HFVI/ANI可以在有限程度上反映术后疼痛水平,特别是在拔管前立即测量时,但缺乏足够的准确性,不能作为术后疼痛的独立预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信