Comparison Between Acute Leukemia Screening Tube and Lineage-Specific Panels for the Diagnosis of Acute Leukemia in Kenya.

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-23 DOI:10.1200/GO-25-00069
Douglas I Munga, Nancy A Okinda, Geoffrey A Omuse, Elizabeth M Kagotho
{"title":"Comparison Between Acute Leukemia Screening Tube and Lineage-Specific Panels for the Diagnosis of Acute Leukemia in Kenya.","authors":"Douglas I Munga, Nancy A Okinda, Geoffrey A Omuse, Elizabeth M Kagotho","doi":"10.1200/GO-25-00069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute leukemia is a group of hematologic malignancies categorized according to the immature cells that proliferate and replace the normal bone marrow. Flow cytometry has emerged as a cornerstone in the diagnosis of hematologic malignancies. Staged analysis with a screening tube containing specific lineage markers determines the need for subsequent testing if there is an abnormal population (blasts). The specific lineage panels to be analyzed are determined depending on the positive markers in the screening tube. This study aimed to determine the agreement of diagnosis using the acute leukemia screening tube (ALST) and the lineage-specific panel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an analytical cross-sectional study performed at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi. It included 256 cases diagnosed as acute leukemia. The diagnosis after the screening tube was compared with the final diagnosis from the lineage-specific panels, and Cohen's Kappa was used to determine the level of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 256 cases, the overall agreement was 94%, with 14 cases being discordant. Myeloperoxidase interpretation in the screening tube accounted for 64% (9 of 14) of the discrepant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that the ALST is almost as good as lineage-specific panels in the diagnosis and classification of acute leukemias. The screening tube can be an added diagnostic tool to complement morphology in resource-limited centers with the capacity to interpret flow cytometry analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2500069"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-25-00069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Acute leukemia is a group of hematologic malignancies categorized according to the immature cells that proliferate and replace the normal bone marrow. Flow cytometry has emerged as a cornerstone in the diagnosis of hematologic malignancies. Staged analysis with a screening tube containing specific lineage markers determines the need for subsequent testing if there is an abnormal population (blasts). The specific lineage panels to be analyzed are determined depending on the positive markers in the screening tube. This study aimed to determine the agreement of diagnosis using the acute leukemia screening tube (ALST) and the lineage-specific panel.

Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study performed at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi. It included 256 cases diagnosed as acute leukemia. The diagnosis after the screening tube was compared with the final diagnosis from the lineage-specific panels, and Cohen's Kappa was used to determine the level of agreement.

Results: Of the 256 cases, the overall agreement was 94%, with 14 cases being discordant. Myeloperoxidase interpretation in the screening tube accounted for 64% (9 of 14) of the discrepant results.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the ALST is almost as good as lineage-specific panels in the diagnosis and classification of acute leukemias. The screening tube can be an added diagnostic tool to complement morphology in resource-limited centers with the capacity to interpret flow cytometry analysis.

肯尼亚急性白血病筛查管与谱系特异性筛查板诊断急性白血病的比较。
目的:急性白血病是一组血液系统恶性肿瘤,根据未成熟细胞增殖和取代正常骨髓分类。流式细胞术已成为血液学恶性肿瘤诊断的基石。用含有特定谱系标记的筛选管进行分期分析,确定是否有异常群体(胚)需要进行后续检测。要分析的特定谱系板取决于筛选管中的阳性标记物。本研究旨在确定使用急性白血病筛查管(ALST)和谱系特异性面板诊断的一致性。方法:这是一项在内罗毕阿迦汗大学医院进行的分析性横断面研究。其中包括256例诊断为急性白血病的病例。将筛查管后的诊断与谱系特异性小组的最终诊断进行比较,并使用Cohen's Kappa来确定一致性水平。结果:256例病例中,总体一致性为94%,不一致性14例。髓过氧化物酶在筛管中的解释占64%(14分之9)的差异结果。结论:本研究表明,在急性白血病的诊断和分类中,ALST几乎与谱系特异性面板一样好。在资源有限的中心,筛管可以作为补充形态学的附加诊断工具,具有解释流式细胞术分析的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信