Incidence of Early Postoperative Complications in Upper Extremity Orthopedic Surgery and Reliability of the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink Classification: A Real-World Study.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1177/15589447251352121
Surya V Kohan Fortuna Figueira, Fernando Holc, Pilar Saralegui, Pedro Bronenberg Victorica, Iván Huespe, Jorge G Boretto
{"title":"Incidence of Early Postoperative Complications in Upper Extremity Orthopedic Surgery and Reliability of the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink Classification: A Real-World Study.","authors":"Surya V Kohan Fortuna Figueira, Fernando Holc, Pilar Saralegui, Pedro Bronenberg Victorica, Iván Huespe, Jorge G Boretto","doi":"10.1177/15589447251352121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper limb orthopedic surgery has no standardized complication classification system. The adaptations in the Clavien-Dindo classification system have only been validated through the creation of scenarios. We hypothesized that the modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink (CDS) classification of hand and upper extremity surgery complications has good intraobserver and interobserver reliability in real-world scenarios. This study assessed the accuracy of the modified CDS classification in real-world scenarios and the absolute incidence of 30-day complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample size calculation was based on the modified CDS classification. A kappa value of 0.84, accompanied by a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.1 and involving 6 observers, indicated the inclusion of 111 events. To achieve the anticipated sample size of 111 complications, 1850 postoperative procedures will be necessary, given the expected 6% incidence of complications. Six evaluators, each with varying levels of expertise in the field, classified the cases according to the modified CDS classification in 2 rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of early complications was 7.05% (95% CI = 6%-8%) in a tertiary care university hospital. Intraobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect; however, interobserver agreement was moderate. The less experienced surgeons presented a better interobserver correlation than the more experienced ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-world scenario of early postoperative complications of upper extremity surgery, the modified CDS classification presented a lower interobserver correlation than reported in the literature. The surgeon's experience could influence its applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447251352121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251352121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Upper limb orthopedic surgery has no standardized complication classification system. The adaptations in the Clavien-Dindo classification system have only been validated through the creation of scenarios. We hypothesized that the modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink (CDS) classification of hand and upper extremity surgery complications has good intraobserver and interobserver reliability in real-world scenarios. This study assessed the accuracy of the modified CDS classification in real-world scenarios and the absolute incidence of 30-day complications.

Methods: The sample size calculation was based on the modified CDS classification. A kappa value of 0.84, accompanied by a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.1 and involving 6 observers, indicated the inclusion of 111 events. To achieve the anticipated sample size of 111 complications, 1850 postoperative procedures will be necessary, given the expected 6% incidence of complications. Six evaluators, each with varying levels of expertise in the field, classified the cases according to the modified CDS classification in 2 rounds.

Results: The incidence of early complications was 7.05% (95% CI = 6%-8%) in a tertiary care university hospital. Intraobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect; however, interobserver agreement was moderate. The less experienced surgeons presented a better interobserver correlation than the more experienced ones.

Conclusions: In a real-world scenario of early postoperative complications of upper extremity surgery, the modified CDS classification presented a lower interobserver correlation than reported in the literature. The surgeon's experience could influence its applicability.

上肢矫形手术术后早期并发症发生率及改良Clavien-Dindo-Sink分类的可靠性:一项现实世界研究
背景:上肢骨科手术没有标准化的并发症分类系统。Clavien-Dindo分类系统中的适应性仅通过创建场景来验证。我们假设改进的Clavien-Dindo-Sink (CDS)手部和上肢手术并发症分类在现实场景中具有良好的观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性。本研究评估了改良的CDS分类在真实情况下的准确性和30天并发症的绝对发生率。方法:采用改良的CDS分类法计算样本量。kappa值为0.84,95%置信区间(CI)为0.1,涉及6名观察者,表明纳入了111个事件。考虑到预期并发症发生率为6%,为达到预期的111例并发症样本量,需要进行1850例术后手术。六名在该领域具有不同专业知识水平的评估人员根据修改后的CDS分类分两轮对病例进行分类。结果:某三级医院早期并发症发生率为7.05% (95% CI = 6% ~ 8%)。观察员内部的一致意见是中等到近乎完美的;然而,观察员间的一致意见是温和的。经验不足的外科医生比经验丰富的外科医生表现出更好的观察者间相关性。结论:在上肢手术早期术后并发症的现实场景中,改进的CDS分类在观察者之间的相关性低于文献报道。外科医生的经验可能会影响其适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信