Timing of stroke risk reassessment in atrial fibrillation patients with CHA2DS2-VA score of 0 or 1: the Norwegian AFNOR study.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf145
Mariam Anjum, Inger Ariansen, Marius Myrstad, Lars J Kjerpeseth, Vidar Hjellvik, Eva Skovlund, Ingrid E Christophersen, Arnljot Tveit, Trygve Berge
{"title":"Timing of stroke risk reassessment in atrial fibrillation patients with CHA2DS2-VA score of 0 or 1: the Norwegian AFNOR study.","authors":"Mariam Anjum, Inger Ariansen, Marius Myrstad, Lars J Kjerpeseth, Vidar Hjellvik, Eva Skovlund, Ingrid E Christophersen, Arnljot Tveit, Trygve Berge","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Stroke risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients increases over time, but the optimal reassessment interval remains unclear. This study evaluated changes in the CHA2DS2-VA score in AF patients with low (score 0) or intermediate (score 1) stroke risk and explored appropriate reassessment intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Norwegian national registries (2011-2018), 40,782 individuals with incident AF aged ≥18 years and a low or intermediate CHA2DS2-VA score were identified. Patients were followed from first AF diagnosis until an increase in the CHA2DS2-VA score, and the proportion with increased score was assessed across age groups. The number needed to reassess to detect one new CHA2DS2-VA risk factor was calculated at different time intervals after AF diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CHA2DS2-VA score increased in 50% of patients after a median follow-up of 1.7 years. The proportion of patients with increased CHA2DS2-VA score was 19% at 6 months, 25% at 1 year, and 40% at 3 years after AF diagnosis. At 1 year, the proportion of patients with a new risk factor was lower in those aged 18-44 years (8%) and 45-54 years (14%) compared to those aged >55 years (30%), with the number needed to reassess at 1 year being 12, 7, and 3 patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New risk factors emerged in half of AF patients within 1.7 years. Age-specific differences underscore the need for tailored reassessment, suggesting a shorter interval of 6 months for patients ≥55 years and 1 year for those <55 years, and routinely at age 65 and 75 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Stroke risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients increases over time, but the optimal reassessment interval remains unclear. This study evaluated changes in the CHA2DS2-VA score in AF patients with low (score 0) or intermediate (score 1) stroke risk and explored appropriate reassessment intervals.

Methods: Using Norwegian national registries (2011-2018), 40,782 individuals with incident AF aged ≥18 years and a low or intermediate CHA2DS2-VA score were identified. Patients were followed from first AF diagnosis until an increase in the CHA2DS2-VA score, and the proportion with increased score was assessed across age groups. The number needed to reassess to detect one new CHA2DS2-VA risk factor was calculated at different time intervals after AF diagnosis.

Results: The CHA2DS2-VA score increased in 50% of patients after a median follow-up of 1.7 years. The proportion of patients with increased CHA2DS2-VA score was 19% at 6 months, 25% at 1 year, and 40% at 3 years after AF diagnosis. At 1 year, the proportion of patients with a new risk factor was lower in those aged 18-44 years (8%) and 45-54 years (14%) compared to those aged >55 years (30%), with the number needed to reassess at 1 year being 12, 7, and 3 patients, respectively.

Conclusion: New risk factors emerged in half of AF patients within 1.7 years. Age-specific differences underscore the need for tailored reassessment, suggesting a shorter interval of 6 months for patients ≥55 years and 1 year for those <55 years, and routinely at age 65 and 75 years.

CHA2DS2-VA评分为0或1的房颤患者卒中风险再评估时机:挪威AFNOR研究
背景和目的:房颤(AF)患者卒中风险随着时间的推移而增加,但最佳的再评估间隔仍不清楚。本研究评估了低(0分)或中(1分)卒中风险的房颤患者CHA2DS2-VA评分的变化,并探讨了适当的再评估间隔。方法:使用挪威国家登记处(2011-2018),确定了40,782例年龄≥18岁且CHA2DS2-VA评分较低或中等的AF患者。患者从首次房颤诊断开始随访,直到CHA2DS2-VA评分升高,并评估各年龄组评分升高的比例。在房颤诊断后的不同时间间隔计算重新评估以发现一个新的CHA2DS2-VA危险因素所需的数量。结果:在中位随访1.7年后,50%的患者CHA2DS2-VA评分升高。房颤诊断后6个月CHA2DS2-VA评分升高的患者比例为19%,1年为25%,3年为40%。1年时,18-44岁(8%)和45-54岁(14%)患者出现新危险因素的比例低于bb0 - 55岁(30%)患者,1年时需要重新评估的患者数量分别为12、7和3例。结论:半数房颤患者在1.7年内出现新的危险因素。年龄特异性差异强调需要进行量身定制的重新评估,建议≥55岁的患者间隔缩短为6个月,≥55岁的患者间隔缩短为1年
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信