Mental Health Support Workers Perspectives on Barriers to and Facilitators of the Effective Delivery of their Roles: A Systematic Review and Meta-aggregation.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Martha Njuguna, Irene Ngune, Yvonne Middlewick
{"title":"Mental Health Support Workers Perspectives on Barriers to and Facilitators of the Effective Delivery of their Roles: A Systematic Review and Meta-aggregation.","authors":"Martha Njuguna, Irene Ngune, Yvonne Middlewick","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01490-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental health support workers (MHSWs) are an important workforce within the mental health care system. Research shows that support services delivered by MHSWs are effective at improving the outcomes of individuals with mental illness. However, there is also literature suggesting that this group of workers are facing many challenges in their roles. This qualitative systematic review sought to explore, analyze and synthesize available primary research literature on the experiences of MHSWs with the aim of identifying the barriers to and facilitators of effective delivery of their roles. An electronic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted for studies from database inception to March 28, 2025. Additional search was conducted via Google Scholar and in the reference lists of the included articles. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess the methodological quality of included articles. Fourteen primary research articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Data synthesis from these articles generated 116 findings and 20 categories, which were aggregated into four synthesized findings: a supportive work environment, service user care barriers, professional and role-related barriers, and operational and support barriers. The review highlights the importance of a supportive work environment in the delivery of support work roles. However, several barriers were also identified and recommendations that can be used to inform practice and policies of mental health support work provided. If addressed, the identified barriers can be translated into facilitators that would enhance the provision of quality care to people with mental illness and enhance the overall job satisfaction of MHSWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01490-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mental health support workers (MHSWs) are an important workforce within the mental health care system. Research shows that support services delivered by MHSWs are effective at improving the outcomes of individuals with mental illness. However, there is also literature suggesting that this group of workers are facing many challenges in their roles. This qualitative systematic review sought to explore, analyze and synthesize available primary research literature on the experiences of MHSWs with the aim of identifying the barriers to and facilitators of effective delivery of their roles. An electronic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted for studies from database inception to March 28, 2025. Additional search was conducted via Google Scholar and in the reference lists of the included articles. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess the methodological quality of included articles. Fourteen primary research articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Data synthesis from these articles generated 116 findings and 20 categories, which were aggregated into four synthesized findings: a supportive work environment, service user care barriers, professional and role-related barriers, and operational and support barriers. The review highlights the importance of a supportive work environment in the delivery of support work roles. However, several barriers were also identified and recommendations that can be used to inform practice and policies of mental health support work provided. If addressed, the identified barriers can be translated into facilitators that would enhance the provision of quality care to people with mental illness and enhance the overall job satisfaction of MHSWs.

心理健康支持工作者对有效履行其职责的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项系统回顾和荟萃。
精神卫生支持工作者(MHSWs)是精神卫生保健系统中的重要工作人员。研究表明,卫生保健服务机构提供的支持服务在改善精神疾病患者的预后方面是有效的。然而,也有文献表明,这群工人在他们的角色中面临着许多挑战。这篇定性系统综述试图探索、分析和综合现有的关于卫生保健服务人员经验的主要研究文献,目的是确定有效发挥其作用的障碍和促进因素。电子检索Medline、CINAHL、PsycINFO和Web of Science从数据库建立到2025年3月28日的研究。通过谷歌Scholar和纳入文章的参考文献列表进行了额外的搜索。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)定性研究关键评估清单来评估纳入文章的方法学质量。14篇主要研究文章符合入选标准,纳入本综述。这些文章的数据综合产生了116项调查结果和20个类别,这些结果汇总为四项综合调查结果:支持性工作环境、服务用户关怀障碍、专业和角色相关障碍以及业务和支持障碍。审查强调了支持性工作环境在发挥支持性工作作用方面的重要性。然而,也确定了一些障碍,并提出了可用于指导精神卫生支助工作的实践和政策的建议。如果解决了这些障碍,就可以将其转化为促进因素,从而提高对精神疾病患者的优质护理,并提高卫生保健服务人员的整体工作满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信