A procedure to identify persistent and effort-independent individual differences in preference for heroin over rewarding social interaction.

IF 7.7 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ginevra D'Ottavio, Alana Sullivan, Sara Pezza, Maria Chiara Ruano, Jacopo Modoni, Ingrid Reverte, Claudia Marchetti, Soami F Zenoni, Marco Venniro, Michele S Milella, Fernando Boix, Yavin Shaham, Daniele Caprioli
{"title":"A procedure to identify persistent and effort-independent individual differences in preference for heroin over rewarding social interaction.","authors":"Ginevra D'Ottavio, Alana Sullivan, Sara Pezza, Maria Chiara Ruano, Jacopo Modoni, Ingrid Reverte, Claudia Marchetti, Soami F Zenoni, Marco Venniro, Michele S Milella, Fernando Boix, Yavin Shaham, Daniele Caprioli","doi":"10.1111/bph.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>In some individuals, opioid use leads to decreased interest in socially relevant rewards. Recent studies showed that after extended-access heroin self-administration, rats strongly prefer social interaction over single unit-dose heroin infusions. We hypothesized that this strong social preference results from access to a suboptimal heroin dose during testing, and individual differences in heroin versus social choice would emerge if rats were given access to their 'preferred' heroin dose.</p><p><strong>Experimental approach: </strong>In Experiment 1, we trained male rats to lever-press for social interaction, followed by heroin self-administration under continuous-access, no-timeout schedule, which promotes burst-patterned heroin taking. We then tested the rats for choice between single-unit heroin dose and 1-min full-contact social interaction, or 5-min heroin-access (sufficient for burst-patterned heroin taking) and 5-min social interaction. In Experiment 2, we extended the 5-min access procedure to female rats and tested heroin versus limited-contact (screen-based) social interaction. We also manipulated response requirements (effort) for heroin.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Rats given a single-unit heroin dose during choice testing, strongly preferred social interaction. In rats given 5-min heroin-access, large individual differences in heroin preference emerged. These differences were independent of sex, social-interaction conditions and effort manipulations. High heroin intake and burst-patterned heroin taking during self-administration, and high heroin seeking during abstinence predicted individual differences in heroin preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications: </strong>Access to 'preferred' heroin doses during the choice tests leads to stable and effort-independent individual differences in heroin preference. This procedure provides a platform to study mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability to opioid addiction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9262,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.70125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: In some individuals, opioid use leads to decreased interest in socially relevant rewards. Recent studies showed that after extended-access heroin self-administration, rats strongly prefer social interaction over single unit-dose heroin infusions. We hypothesized that this strong social preference results from access to a suboptimal heroin dose during testing, and individual differences in heroin versus social choice would emerge if rats were given access to their 'preferred' heroin dose.

Experimental approach: In Experiment 1, we trained male rats to lever-press for social interaction, followed by heroin self-administration under continuous-access, no-timeout schedule, which promotes burst-patterned heroin taking. We then tested the rats for choice between single-unit heroin dose and 1-min full-contact social interaction, or 5-min heroin-access (sufficient for burst-patterned heroin taking) and 5-min social interaction. In Experiment 2, we extended the 5-min access procedure to female rats and tested heroin versus limited-contact (screen-based) social interaction. We also manipulated response requirements (effort) for heroin.

Key results: Rats given a single-unit heroin dose during choice testing, strongly preferred social interaction. In rats given 5-min heroin-access, large individual differences in heroin preference emerged. These differences were independent of sex, social-interaction conditions and effort manipulations. High heroin intake and burst-patterned heroin taking during self-administration, and high heroin seeking during abstinence predicted individual differences in heroin preference.

Conclusion and implications: Access to 'preferred' heroin doses during the choice tests leads to stable and effort-independent individual differences in heroin preference. This procedure provides a platform to study mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability to opioid addiction.

一个程序,以确定持久和努力独立的个人差异偏好海洛因超过奖励的社会交往。
背景和目的:在一些个体中,阿片类药物的使用导致对社会相关奖励的兴趣降低。最近的研究表明,大鼠在自我给药后,强烈倾向于社会互动,而不是单次单位剂量的海洛因注射。我们假设,这种强烈的社会偏好是由于在测试期间获得了次优海洛因剂量,如果大鼠获得了他们“首选”的海洛因剂量,那么海洛因与社会选择的个体差异就会出现。实验方法:在实验1中,我们训练雄性大鼠进行杠杆按压进行社会互动,然后在连续获取,无超时的计划下进行海洛因自我给药,这促进了突发模式的海洛因服用。然后,我们测试了大鼠在单单位海洛因剂量和1分钟完全接触社会互动,或5分钟海洛因接触(足以爆发模式海洛因摄入)和5分钟社会互动之间的选择。在实验2中,我们延长了雌性大鼠5分钟的接触过程,并测试了海洛因与有限接触(基于屏幕)的社会互动。我们还操纵了对海洛因的反应要求(努力)。主要结果:在选择测试中给予单剂量海洛因的大鼠,强烈倾向于社会互动。在给予5分钟海洛因接触的大鼠中,海洛因偏好出现了很大的个体差异。这些差异与性别、社会互动条件和努力操作无关。自我给药期间的高海洛因摄入量和突发型海洛因摄入,以及戒断期间的高海洛因寻求预测了海洛因偏好的个体差异。结论和启示:在选择测试中获得“首选”海洛因剂量导致海洛因偏好的稳定和努力独立的个体差异。该程序为研究阿片类药物成瘾的恢复力和脆弱性机制提供了一个平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
12.30%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) is a biomedical science journal offering comprehensive international coverage of experimental and translational pharmacology. It publishes original research, authoritative reviews, mini reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, databases, letters to the Editor, and commentaries. Review articles, databases, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are typically commissioned, but unsolicited contributions are also considered, either as standalone papers or part of themed issues. In addition to basic science research, BJP features translational pharmacology research, including proof-of-concept and early mechanistic studies in humans. While it generally does not publish first-in-man phase I studies or phase IIb, III, or IV studies, exceptions may be made under certain circumstances, particularly if results are combined with preclinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信