Diagnosis of Systemic Rheumatic Disease Using the Connective Tissue Disease Screen.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Antibodies Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI:10.3390/antib14030056
Abeline Kapuczinski, Dorian Parisis, Nour Kassab, Julie Smet, Muhammad Soyfoo
{"title":"Diagnosis of Systemic Rheumatic Disease Using the Connective Tissue Disease Screen.","authors":"Abeline Kapuczinski, Dorian Parisis, Nour Kassab, Julie Smet, Muhammad Soyfoo","doi":"10.3390/antib14030056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of autoimmune conditions characterized by diverse clinical manifestations and autoantibody profiles, posing significant diagnostic challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of automated connective tissue disease screening assays, commonly known as CTD screens, in diagnosing systemic rheumatic diseases. Eleven studies, including cohort and case-control designs, involving a total of 2384 CTD-positive patients, 8972 controls without CTD, and 679 healthy blood donors, were analyzed. The results demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 79.36% and specificity of 90.79% for Elia<sup>®</sup> CTD-screen, and a sensitivity of 87.23% and specificity of 83.56% for QuantaFlash<sup>®</sup> CTD-screen. These tests exhibited varied sensitivity across individual CTDs, with excellent specificity for distinguishing CTD patients from healthy controls. Despite their utility, CTD screens should not be solely relied upon for diagnosis due to limitations in positive predictive value, particularly in low-prevalence populations. Clinical context and expert rheumatological evaluation remain indispensable. Optimizing the use of CTD screens can enhance diagnostic efficiency, reduce unnecessary testing, and mitigate patient anxiety and healthcare costs. Further research focusing on integrating these assays with clinical evaluation is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":8188,"journal":{"name":"Antibodies","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibodies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antib14030056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of autoimmune conditions characterized by diverse clinical manifestations and autoantibody profiles, posing significant diagnostic challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of automated connective tissue disease screening assays, commonly known as CTD screens, in diagnosing systemic rheumatic diseases. Eleven studies, including cohort and case-control designs, involving a total of 2384 CTD-positive patients, 8972 controls without CTD, and 679 healthy blood donors, were analyzed. The results demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 79.36% and specificity of 90.79% for Elia® CTD-screen, and a sensitivity of 87.23% and specificity of 83.56% for QuantaFlash® CTD-screen. These tests exhibited varied sensitivity across individual CTDs, with excellent specificity for distinguishing CTD patients from healthy controls. Despite their utility, CTD screens should not be solely relied upon for diagnosis due to limitations in positive predictive value, particularly in low-prevalence populations. Clinical context and expert rheumatological evaluation remain indispensable. Optimizing the use of CTD screens can enhance diagnostic efficiency, reduce unnecessary testing, and mitigate patient anxiety and healthcare costs. Further research focusing on integrating these assays with clinical evaluation is recommended.

使用结缔组织疾病筛查诊断系统性风湿病。
结缔组织疾病(CTDs)包括一组异质性的自身免疫性疾病,其特征是不同的临床表现和自身抗体谱,提出了重大的诊断挑战。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了自动结缔组织疾病筛查分析(通常称为CTD筛查)在诊断系统性风湿病中的诊断性能。包括队列和病例对照设计在内的11项研究,共涉及2384例CTD阳性患者、8972例非CTD对照组和679名健康献血者。结果表明,Elia®ctd筛查的总灵敏度为79.36%,特异性为90.79%;QuantaFlash®ctd筛查的总灵敏度为87.23%,特异性为83.56%。这些测试在个体CTD中表现出不同的敏感性,在区分CTD患者和健康对照方面具有出色的特异性。尽管CTD筛查具有实用价值,但由于阳性预测价值的局限性,特别是在低患病率人群中,不应完全依赖CTD筛查进行诊断。临床背景和风湿病专家评估仍然是必不可少的。优化CTD屏幕的使用可以提高诊断效率,减少不必要的测试,并减轻患者的焦虑和医疗保健成本。建议进一步研究将这些检测方法与临床评价相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibodies
Antibodies IMMUNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
6.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibodies (ISSN 2073-4468), an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to antibodies and antigens. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure - if unable to be published in a normal way - can be deposited as supplementary material. This journal covers all topics related to antibodies and antigens, topics of interest include (but are not limited to): antibody-producing cells (including B cells), antibody structure and function, antibody-antigen interactions, Fc receptors, antibody manufacturing antibody engineering, antibody therapy, immunoassays, antibody diagnosis, tissue antigens, exogenous antigens, endogenous antigens, autoantigens, monoclonal antibodies, natural antibodies, humoral immune responses, immunoregulatory molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信