Enhanced diagnostic potential of CSPG4 in melanoma and nevi: a comparative study with PRAME, CDC7 and Ki67.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Elias At Koch, Christina Seidel, Ramona Erber, Michael Erdmann, Markus V Heppt, Stefan Schliep, Carola Berking, Jan Dörrie, Niels Schaft
{"title":"Enhanced diagnostic potential of CSPG4 in melanoma and nevi: a comparative study with PRAME, CDC7 and Ki67.","authors":"Elias At Koch, Christina Seidel, Ramona Erber, Michael Erdmann, Markus V Heppt, Stefan Schliep, Carola Berking, Jan Dörrie, Niels Schaft","doi":"10.1002/path.6450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) is a promising target for melanoma immunotherapy, but its expression in benign melanocytic lesions and its diagnostic value remain unexplored. This study assessed CSPG4 expression in benign nevi (BN), dysplastic nevi (DN), and superficial spreading melanomas (SSM), comparing it with PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) and evaluating the cell division cycle 7-related protein kinase (CDC7) and the proliferation marker Ki67. Histological sections were stained using automated instruments, digitized, and analyzed using QuPath. Cohorts of BN, DN, and SSM were created, and positive cells/mm<sup>2</sup> and H-scores were determined. A total of 336 IHC stainings from 84 specimens were analyzed. CSPG4 expression was readily detected in SSM and was significantly stronger in DN (p = 0.005), with the highest intensity observed in BN (p < 0.001). PRAME showed the highest density of positive cells/mm<sup>2</sup> in SSM, was significantly reduced in DN (p < 0.001), and was lowest in BN (p < 0.001). Ki67 expression was strong in SSM, moderate in DN (p = 0.62), and low in BN (p = 0.008). CDC7 expression was most intense in DN, less in SSM (p = 0.39), and weakest in BN (p = 0.002). ROC AUC values for SSM versus DN and SSM versus BN were 0.764 and 0.921 for CSPG4, 0.85 and 0.889 for PRAME, 0.735 and 0.742 for Ki67, and 0.425 and 0.767 for CDC7. While PRAME was the most reliable marker for differentiating DN and SSM, CSPG4 was superior for distinguishing BN from SSM due to its high expression in BN. However, CSPG4-targeting therapies may trigger on-target/off-tumor effects due to its high expression in melanocytic nevi. © 2025 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.</p>","PeriodicalId":232,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/path.6450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) is a promising target for melanoma immunotherapy, but its expression in benign melanocytic lesions and its diagnostic value remain unexplored. This study assessed CSPG4 expression in benign nevi (BN), dysplastic nevi (DN), and superficial spreading melanomas (SSM), comparing it with PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) and evaluating the cell division cycle 7-related protein kinase (CDC7) and the proliferation marker Ki67. Histological sections were stained using automated instruments, digitized, and analyzed using QuPath. Cohorts of BN, DN, and SSM were created, and positive cells/mm2 and H-scores were determined. A total of 336 IHC stainings from 84 specimens were analyzed. CSPG4 expression was readily detected in SSM and was significantly stronger in DN (p = 0.005), with the highest intensity observed in BN (p < 0.001). PRAME showed the highest density of positive cells/mm2 in SSM, was significantly reduced in DN (p < 0.001), and was lowest in BN (p < 0.001). Ki67 expression was strong in SSM, moderate in DN (p = 0.62), and low in BN (p = 0.008). CDC7 expression was most intense in DN, less in SSM (p = 0.39), and weakest in BN (p = 0.002). ROC AUC values for SSM versus DN and SSM versus BN were 0.764 and 0.921 for CSPG4, 0.85 and 0.889 for PRAME, 0.735 and 0.742 for Ki67, and 0.425 and 0.767 for CDC7. While PRAME was the most reliable marker for differentiating DN and SSM, CSPG4 was superior for distinguishing BN from SSM due to its high expression in BN. However, CSPG4-targeting therapies may trigger on-target/off-tumor effects due to its high expression in melanocytic nevi. © 2025 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

增强CSPG4在黑色素瘤和痣中的诊断潜力:与PRAME、CDC7和Ki67的比较研究。
硫酸软骨素蛋白多糖4 (CSPG4)是黑色素瘤免疫治疗的一个有希望的靶点,但其在良性黑色素细胞病变中的表达及其诊断价值尚不清楚。本研究评估了CSPG4在良性痣(BN)、发育不良痣(DN)和浅扩散黑色素瘤(SSM)中的表达,并将其与黑色素瘤中优先表达抗原(PRAME)进行比较,并评估了细胞分裂周期7相关蛋白激酶(CDC7)和增殖标志物Ki67的表达。组织切片采用自动化仪器染色,数字化,并使用QuPath进行分析。建立BN、DN和SSM队列,并测定阳性细胞/mm2和h评分。84份标本共336份免疫组化染色。CSPG4在SSM中表达明显,在DN中表达明显增强(p = 0.005),在BN中表达强度最高(SSM中p2),在DN中表达显著降低(p = 0.005)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Pathology
The Journal of Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.40%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology aims to serve as a translational bridge between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The main interests of the Journal lie in publishing studies that further our understanding the pathophysiological and pathogenetic mechanisms of human disease. The Journal of Pathology welcomes investigative studies on human tissues, in vitro and in vivo experimental studies, and investigations based on animal models with a clear relevance to human disease, including transgenic systems. As well as original research papers, the Journal seeks to provide rapid publication in a variety of other formats, including editorials, review articles, commentaries and perspectives and other features, both contributed and solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信