Seismic performance and expected economic losses of dual MRF RC buildings with buckling-restrained braces using FEMA P-58

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Alfredo Félix-Soto , Alfredo Reyes-Salazar , Marco A. Santos-Santiago , Robespierre Chávez , Magnolia Soto-Félix , Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán
{"title":"Seismic performance and expected economic losses of dual MRF RC buildings with buckling-restrained braces using FEMA P-58","authors":"Alfredo Félix-Soto ,&nbsp;Alfredo Reyes-Salazar ,&nbsp;Marco A. Santos-Santiago ,&nbsp;Robespierre Chávez ,&nbsp;Magnolia Soto-Félix ,&nbsp;Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research aims to evaluate the seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings located on different types of soil in Mexico City, in terms of expected economic losses. The models are based on moment-resisting frames and are alternatively equipped with buckling-restrained braces. Nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed for different levels of seismic intensity with the objective of obtaining structural response parameters such as interstory drifts and floor accelerations. Finally, the seismic performance of the buildings is evaluated using the second generation of performance-based seismic design methodologies, which, through a probabilistic method and using parameters such as structural response, building characteristics, and seismic hazard, allows for obtaining results in terms of expected annual losses (EAL) and performing a cost-benefit analysis. This analysis demonstrated the benefits of using buckling-restrained braces, as they presented lower EAL and life-cycle costs compared to traditional models, mainly in the models located on soft soil, where the model equipped with buckling-restrained braces proved to be 20 % more cost-effective, while in contrast, the stiff soil condition was inefficient, resulting in a 12 % higher cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 109752"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235201242501567X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings located on different types of soil in Mexico City, in terms of expected economic losses. The models are based on moment-resisting frames and are alternatively equipped with buckling-restrained braces. Nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed for different levels of seismic intensity with the objective of obtaining structural response parameters such as interstory drifts and floor accelerations. Finally, the seismic performance of the buildings is evaluated using the second generation of performance-based seismic design methodologies, which, through a probabilistic method and using parameters such as structural response, building characteristics, and seismic hazard, allows for obtaining results in terms of expected annual losses (EAL) and performing a cost-benefit analysis. This analysis demonstrated the benefits of using buckling-restrained braces, as they presented lower EAL and life-cycle costs compared to traditional models, mainly in the models located on soft soil, where the model equipped with buckling-restrained braces proved to be 20 % more cost-effective, while in contrast, the stiff soil condition was inefficient, resulting in a 12 % higher cost.
使用FEMA P-58抗屈曲支撑的双层MRF RC建筑的抗震性能和预期经济损失
本研究旨在评估位于墨西哥城不同类型土壤上的钢筋混凝土建筑的抗震性能,以及预期的经济损失。这些模型是基于力矩抵抗框架,并可选择配备屈曲约束支撑。在不同烈度的地震作用下进行非线性动力分析,以获得层间位移和楼板加速度等结构响应参数。最后,使用第二代基于性能的抗震设计方法对建筑物的抗震性能进行评估,该方法通过概率方法和使用结构响应、建筑特征和地震危险性等参数,可以获得预期年度损失(EAL)的结果,并进行成本效益分析。该分析证明了使用屈曲约束支撑的好处,因为与传统模型相比,它们具有更低的EAL和生命周期成本,主要是在软土上的模型中,配备屈曲约束支撑的模型被证明具有20% %的成本效益,而相比之下,刚性土壤条件下的模型效率低下,导致成本高出12% %。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信