Unraveling drivers of land use efficiency in rapidly urbanizing areas: A hybrid SBM-DDF and explainable machine learning framework

IF 7 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Jialv Zhu , Wenxin Liu , Shixin Zheng , Yingyue Sun
{"title":"Unraveling drivers of land use efficiency in rapidly urbanizing areas: A hybrid SBM-DDF and explainable machine learning framework","authors":"Jialv Zhu ,&nbsp;Wenxin Liu ,&nbsp;Shixin Zheng ,&nbsp;Yingyue Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the acceleration of urbanization in China, improving land use efficiency has become a key priority for sustainable development. This study, based on a multi-source panel dataset covering 35 representative rapidly expanding cities from 2007 to 2022, proposes a hybrid analytical framework that integrates a Slack-Based Measure Directional Distance Function (SBM-DDF) model for measuring urban land use efficiency (ULUE) with an explainable machine learning pipeline combining CatBoost, SHAP, and Generalized Additive Models (GAM) to identify and interpret its key drivers. The results show that ULUE has generally increased over time, with more rapid improvements observed after 2015, particularly in eastern cities. Nevertheless, significant regional disparities persist: the eastern region has the highest average efficiency (0.749), followed by the central (0.737), western (0.727), and northeastern regions (0.691). Some developed cities have seen declines in efficiency, while several less-developed ones are approaching the efficiency frontier. Based on the average SHAP contributions, economic level (38 %), social development (23 %), and environmental conditions (18 %) emerge as the dominant drivers, all exhibiting strong threshold effects. ULUE in eastern cities is mainly driven by economic and industrial growth, while other regions rely more on improved public services and environmental management. Land policies and market openness show a negative impact overall. These findings underscore the need to incorporate non-linear thresholds into policy design, promote regionally differentiated land use strategies, and align spatial planning with both economic development and environmental sustainability goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103518"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525002346","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the acceleration of urbanization in China, improving land use efficiency has become a key priority for sustainable development. This study, based on a multi-source panel dataset covering 35 representative rapidly expanding cities from 2007 to 2022, proposes a hybrid analytical framework that integrates a Slack-Based Measure Directional Distance Function (SBM-DDF) model for measuring urban land use efficiency (ULUE) with an explainable machine learning pipeline combining CatBoost, SHAP, and Generalized Additive Models (GAM) to identify and interpret its key drivers. The results show that ULUE has generally increased over time, with more rapid improvements observed after 2015, particularly in eastern cities. Nevertheless, significant regional disparities persist: the eastern region has the highest average efficiency (0.749), followed by the central (0.737), western (0.727), and northeastern regions (0.691). Some developed cities have seen declines in efficiency, while several less-developed ones are approaching the efficiency frontier. Based on the average SHAP contributions, economic level (38 %), social development (23 %), and environmental conditions (18 %) emerge as the dominant drivers, all exhibiting strong threshold effects. ULUE in eastern cities is mainly driven by economic and industrial growth, while other regions rely more on improved public services and environmental management. Land policies and market openness show a negative impact overall. These findings underscore the need to incorporate non-linear thresholds into policy design, promote regionally differentiated land use strategies, and align spatial planning with both economic development and environmental sustainability goals.
快速城市化地区土地利用效率的驱动因素:一个混合SBM-DDF和可解释的机器学习框架
随着中国城市化进程的加快,提高土地利用效率已成为可持续发展的重中之重。本研究基于涵盖2007年至2022年期间35个代表性快速扩张城市的多源面板数据集,提出了一个混合分析框架,该框架将用于测量城市土地利用效率(ULUE)的基于散漫的测量定向距离函数(SBM-DDF)模型与结合CatBoost、SHAP和广义可加模型(GAM)的可解释机器学习管道相结合,以识别和解释其关键驱动因素。结果表明,随着时间的推移,ULUE总体上有所增加,2015年之后的改善更为迅速,尤其是在东部城市。然而,显著的地区差异仍然存在:东部地区的平均效率最高(0.749),其次是中部地区(0.737)、西部地区(0.727)和东北部地区(0.691)。一些发达城市的效率有所下降,而一些欠发达城市正在接近效率边界。从平均SHAP贡献来看,经济水平(38%)、社会发展(23%)和环境条件(18%)成为主导驱动因素,均表现出较强的阈值效应。东部城市的超低利用主要是由经济和工业增长推动的,而其他地区则更多地依靠改善的公共服务和环境管理。土地政策和市场开放总体上表现出负面影响。这些发现强调了将非线性阈值纳入政策设计,促进区域差异化土地利用战略,并使空间规划与经济发展和环境可持续性目标保持一致的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信