Efficacy of probiotic supplementation in influencing cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Weitong Liu, Jinghan Guo, Yuxin Dong, Jingxin Li, Yanqing Wang
{"title":"Efficacy of probiotic supplementation in influencing cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Weitong Liu,&nbsp;Jinghan Guo,&nbsp;Yuxin Dong,&nbsp;Jingxin Li,&nbsp;Yanqing Wang","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline and behavioral changes. Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiota influences central nervous system function. Probiotic interventions may offer a promising therapeutic approach by modulating the gut microbiota composition and potentially improving cognitive outcomes in AD patients. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of probiotic supplementation on cognitive function in AD patients by analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024508725), we conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through April 9th, 2024. Only double-blind RCTs comparing probiotic supplementation to placebo in patients aged 65 or older with clinically diagnosed AD were included. Primary outcomes were cognitive function scores from validated tools like MMSE and TYM. Our stringent inclusion criteria identified four double-blind RCTs with 251 participants aged 65 or older with clinically diagnosed AD. Statistical analysis using a random-effects model revealed significant cognitive improvement in probiotic-treated groups compared to placebo controls (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] = 0.67; 95% CI [0.14, 1.19]; P &lt; 0.05), though substantial heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup> = 79.16%). Subgroup analyses indicated that probiotic formulation type, dosage, and baseline AD severity may influence cognitive outcomes. While these findings suggest probiotics may offer cognitive benefits for AD patients, the high heterogeneity and limited study number necessitate additional well-designed clinical trials to confirm these promising results and establish optimal treatment protocols for clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline and behavioral changes. Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiota influences central nervous system function. Probiotic interventions may offer a promising therapeutic approach by modulating the gut microbiota composition and potentially improving cognitive outcomes in AD patients. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of probiotic supplementation on cognitive function in AD patients by analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024508725), we conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through April 9th, 2024. Only double-blind RCTs comparing probiotic supplementation to placebo in patients aged 65 or older with clinically diagnosed AD were included. Primary outcomes were cognitive function scores from validated tools like MMSE and TYM. Our stringent inclusion criteria identified four double-blind RCTs with 251 participants aged 65 or older with clinically diagnosed AD. Statistical analysis using a random-effects model revealed significant cognitive improvement in probiotic-treated groups compared to placebo controls (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] = 0.67; 95% CI [0.14, 1.19]; P < 0.05), though substantial heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 79.16%). Subgroup analyses indicated that probiotic formulation type, dosage, and baseline AD severity may influence cognitive outcomes. While these findings suggest probiotics may offer cognitive benefits for AD patients, the high heterogeneity and limited study number necessitate additional well-designed clinical trials to confirm these promising results and establish optimal treatment protocols for clinical implementation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

补充益生菌对阿尔茨海默病认知功能的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种以认知能力下降和行为改变为特征的进行性神经退行性疾病。新出现的证据表明,肠道微生物群影响中枢神经系统功能。益生菌干预可能通过调节肠道菌群组成和潜在地改善AD患者的认知结果提供一种有希望的治疗方法。本荟萃分析旨在通过分析随机对照试验(rct)来评估益生菌补充剂对AD患者认知功能的影响。遵循PRISMA 2020指南并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024508725),我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov上进行了全面的检索,截止到2024年4月9日。在65岁及以上临床诊断为AD的患者中,只纳入了比较益生菌补充和安慰剂的双盲随机对照试验。主要结果是通过MMSE和TYM等有效工具获得的认知功能评分。我们严格的纳入标准确定了四项双盲随机对照试验,共有251名65岁及以上临床诊断为AD的参与者。采用随机效应模型的统计分析显示,与安慰剂对照组相比,益生菌治疗组的认知能力有显著改善(标准化平均差[SMD] = 0.67;95% ci [0.14, 1.19];P & lt;0.05),但存在显著异质性(I2 = 79.16%)。亚组分析表明,益生菌制剂类型、剂量和AD基线严重程度可能影响认知结果。虽然这些发现表明益生菌可能对阿尔茨海默病患者的认知有好处,但高异质性和有限的研究数量需要额外的精心设计的临床试验来证实这些有希望的结果,并建立临床实施的最佳治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信