Charif Khaled , Lise Sogalow , Laura Polastro , Maxime Fastrez , Michel Moreau , C. Florin Pop , Isabelle Veys , Vincent Donckier , Gabriel Liberale
{"title":"Impact of the completeness of cytoreductive surgery on the prognostic role of the KELIM score in patients treated for ovarian peritoneal metastasis","authors":"Charif Khaled , Lise Sogalow , Laura Polastro , Maxime Fastrez , Michel Moreau , C. Florin Pop , Isabelle Veys , Vincent Donckier , Gabriel Liberale","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The two major treatment related prognostic factors for peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer (PMOC) are chemosensitivity and completeness of cytoreduction (CC). Chemosensitivity can be assessed by the CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) score, based on CA-125 kinetics. CC is evaluated by residual macroscopic disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of KELIM score versus CC, in a population who underwent complete (CC-0) and near-complete (CC-1) debulking.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Monocentric retrospective study including patients with primary PMOC treated with curative intent between January 2010 and December 2021. The Biomarker Kinetics website (CA-125 KELIM Calculator) was used to calculate the KELIM score. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the impact of CC and KELIM score on PFS and OS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 111 patients were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that PFS and OS were significantly influenced by KELIM, CC, PCI, and BRCA mutation (p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that PFS was significantly influenced by CC (HR = 0.481, p = 0.0027), while OS was influenced by KELIM (HR 0.561, p = 0.0408).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These results suggest that PFS is more impacted by the completeness of the surgery than the KELIM score and the KELIM score influences OS more than the completeness of surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 102272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740425000878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The two major treatment related prognostic factors for peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer (PMOC) are chemosensitivity and completeness of cytoreduction (CC). Chemosensitivity can be assessed by the CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) score, based on CA-125 kinetics. CC is evaluated by residual macroscopic disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of KELIM score versus CC, in a population who underwent complete (CC-0) and near-complete (CC-1) debulking.
Materials and methods
Monocentric retrospective study including patients with primary PMOC treated with curative intent between January 2010 and December 2021. The Biomarker Kinetics website (CA-125 KELIM Calculator) was used to calculate the KELIM score. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the impact of CC and KELIM score on PFS and OS.
Results
A total of 111 patients were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that PFS and OS were significantly influenced by KELIM, CC, PCI, and BRCA mutation (p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that PFS was significantly influenced by CC (HR = 0.481, p = 0.0027), while OS was influenced by KELIM (HR 0.561, p = 0.0408).
Conclusion
These results suggest that PFS is more impacted by the completeness of the surgery than the KELIM score and the KELIM score influences OS more than the completeness of surgery.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.