Biomechanical restoration in unilateral facet arthroplasty: a cadaveric evaluation

IF 3.2 Q3 Medicine
North American Spine Society Journal Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100766
Christopher D. Sturm MD , Sarah Mayer MSc , Joshua Tandio MSc , Jeremi M. Leasure MSc , Oluwatodimu Richard Raji MEng
{"title":"Biomechanical restoration in unilateral facet arthroplasty: a cadaveric evaluation","authors":"Christopher D. Sturm MD ,&nbsp;Sarah Mayer MSc ,&nbsp;Joshua Tandio MSc ,&nbsp;Jeremi M. Leasure MSc ,&nbsp;Oluwatodimu Richard Raji MEng","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Facet incompetency can lead to altered spine biomechanics. However, while total posterior arthroplasty techniques in lieu of fusion are of increasing interest, unilateral techniques are yet to be investigated. This study aimed to assess the biomechanical effect of a unilateral facet arthroplasty (UFA) system on motion and loading characteristics at the treated L4-5 level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven cadaveric spines from L3-Sacrum were tested within the multidirectional pure moment bending model between 0 to ± 10 Nm in flexion-extension (FE), flexion-extension with 400 N of compressive follower load (FE-FL), axial rotation (AR), and lateral bending (LB). We measured the L4-L5 angular range of motion, the intradiscal pressure, and the contralateral facet contact force. Each specimen was tested in intact (I), capsulotomy (C), medial facetectomy (MF), total facetectomy (TF), and UFA conditions. We also measured the load transfer at the bone-implant interface in the UFA condition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>UFA significantly restored 93% (FE), 77% (FE-FL), 123% (AR), and 106% (LB) of the native range of motion (p&lt;.05). UFA significantly restored the native intradiscal pressure during compressive follower load (I:173±67KPa vs. TF:103± 82KPa vs. UFA:174±69KPa), and partially during contra-axial rotation (I:32±27KPa vs. TF:81±55KPa vs. UFA:59±46KPa). No significant changes were observed in facet contact force. Contra-axial rotation induced the most substantial loads transferred through the bone-implant interface.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>UFA is most effective at restoring native intervertebral disc load transfer without altering facet loading at the treated level. UFA is equivalent to the intact condition in FE, FE-FL, and LB, but larger in AR, even after reverting 55% of induced instability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100766"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425001866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Facet incompetency can lead to altered spine biomechanics. However, while total posterior arthroplasty techniques in lieu of fusion are of increasing interest, unilateral techniques are yet to be investigated. This study aimed to assess the biomechanical effect of a unilateral facet arthroplasty (UFA) system on motion and loading characteristics at the treated L4-5 level.

Methods

Seven cadaveric spines from L3-Sacrum were tested within the multidirectional pure moment bending model between 0 to ± 10 Nm in flexion-extension (FE), flexion-extension with 400 N of compressive follower load (FE-FL), axial rotation (AR), and lateral bending (LB). We measured the L4-L5 angular range of motion, the intradiscal pressure, and the contralateral facet contact force. Each specimen was tested in intact (I), capsulotomy (C), medial facetectomy (MF), total facetectomy (TF), and UFA conditions. We also measured the load transfer at the bone-implant interface in the UFA condition.

Results

UFA significantly restored 93% (FE), 77% (FE-FL), 123% (AR), and 106% (LB) of the native range of motion (p<.05). UFA significantly restored the native intradiscal pressure during compressive follower load (I:173±67KPa vs. TF:103± 82KPa vs. UFA:174±69KPa), and partially during contra-axial rotation (I:32±27KPa vs. TF:81±55KPa vs. UFA:59±46KPa). No significant changes were observed in facet contact force. Contra-axial rotation induced the most substantial loads transferred through the bone-implant interface.

Conclusions

UFA is most effective at restoring native intervertebral disc load transfer without altering facet loading at the treated level. UFA is equivalent to the intact condition in FE, FE-FL, and LB, but larger in AR, even after reverting 55% of induced instability.
单侧关节突置换术的生物力学修复:尸体评估
背景:关节突功能不全可导致脊柱生物力学改变。然而,尽管全后路关节置换术代替融合术越来越受到关注,但单侧技术仍有待研究。本研究旨在评估单侧关节突置换术(UFA)系统对L4-5节段运动和负荷特性的生物力学影响。方法采用0 ~±10 Nm的多方向纯弯矩弯曲模型,对7根尸体l3 -骶骨棘进行了屈伸(FE)、屈伸与400 N的压缩从动载荷(FE- fl)、轴向旋转(AR)和侧向弯曲(LB)试验。我们测量了L4-L5关节角活动范围、椎间盘内压力和对侧关节突接触力。每个标本在完整(I)、囊膜切除术(C)、内侧面切除术(MF)、全面切除术(TF)和UFA条件下进行测试。我们还测量了UFA条件下骨-种植体界面处的载荷传递。结果tfa显著恢复了93% (FE)、77% (FE- fl)、123% (AR)和106% (LB)的运动范围(p < 0.05)。UFA可显著恢复随动负荷时的椎间盘内压力(I:173±67KPa vs. TF:103±82KPa vs. UFA:174±69KPa),部分恢复对轴旋转时的椎间盘内压力(I:32±27KPa vs. TF:81±55KPa vs. UFA:59±46KPa)。关节面接触力未见明显变化。对轴旋转诱导通过骨-种植体界面传递的最大载荷。结论:在不改变治疗水平关节突负荷的情况下,sufa能最有效地恢复椎间盘负荷转移。在FE、FE- fl和LB中,UFA与完整状态相当,但在AR中,UFA更大,即使在恢复55%的诱导不稳定性后也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书