Adam A. Barsouk , Austin Yang , Jonathan H. Sussman , Omar Elghawy , Jessica Xu , Jason Xu , Lingbin Meng , Shunsuke Koga , Wei Du , Ronac Mamtani , Lin Mei
{"title":"Survival Disparities by Sex, Race, and Age in the Era of Contemporary Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Therapy: A Real-World Analysis","authors":"Adam A. Barsouk , Austin Yang , Jonathan H. Sussman , Omar Elghawy , Jessica Xu , Jason Xu , Lingbin Meng , Shunsuke Koga , Wei Du , Ronac Mamtani , Lin Mei","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Retrospective data suggest poorer survival for female, racial minority, and older advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) patients. However, data on survival disparities in the modern era remain limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cohort study used Flatiron Health’s nationwide de-identified electronic health record (EHR)-derived database. Patients who initiated systemic therapy for aUC between January, 2017 and May, 2024 were included. Baseline characteristics, treatment history, and clinical outcomes were abstracted. PFS and OS were compared by sex (male vs. female), race (White, Black, vs. Asian/Pacific Islander [API]), and age at diagnosis (> 65 years [y] vs. ≤ 65 y), using Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Independent sample t-tests and chi-square analyses were used for univariate comparisons. <em>P</em>-values < <em>.</em>05 were considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 5142 patients with aUC were identified. 1419 were (28%) female and 575 (11%) were > 65 y. Of those with recorded race (<em>n</em> = 3492), 1% were API, 5% Black, 14% categorized as “other,” and 80% White. There was no difference in PFS (8.7 vs. 9.0 months [m], HR1.03; <em>P</em> = <em>.</em>82) or OS (13.2 vs. 13.5 m; HR1.05, <em>P</em> = <em>.</em>31) between women and men. Women had shorter PFS to men on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (<em>P</em> = <em>.</em>002) but not with other first-line (1L) therapy. API patients had comparable PFS (9.6 vs. 8.9 m; HR0.91; <em>P</em> = <em>.</em>45) but longer OS (28.5 vs. 14.1 m; HR0.56; <em>P</em> = <em>.</em>008) compared to White patients. Black patients had comparable PFS (7.9 vs. 8.5; HR1.06; <em>P</em> = <em>.</em>81) and OS (11.5 vs. 14.1 m; HR1.32; <em>P</em> = <em>.</em>73) vs White patients. Patients > 65 y had shorter PFS to ≤ 65 y (7.6 vs. 9.0 m; HR1.14, <em>P</em> = <em>.</em>019); however, OS was longer in older patients (16.5 vs. 12.8 m; HR0.80, <em>P</em> < <em>.</em>001). Only on 1L ICI, OS was longer in those > 65 y compared to those ≤ 65 y (HR0.71; <em>P</em> = <em>.</em>021)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this large real-world database, female aUC patients had comparable PFS and OS to males. API patients showed superior OS to White patients. Patients > 65 y had inferior PFS but superior OS to patients ≤ 65 y.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"23 5","pages":"Article 102395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767325000953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Retrospective data suggest poorer survival for female, racial minority, and older advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) patients. However, data on survival disparities in the modern era remain limited.
Methods
This cohort study used Flatiron Health’s nationwide de-identified electronic health record (EHR)-derived database. Patients who initiated systemic therapy for aUC between January, 2017 and May, 2024 were included. Baseline characteristics, treatment history, and clinical outcomes were abstracted. PFS and OS were compared by sex (male vs. female), race (White, Black, vs. Asian/Pacific Islander [API]), and age at diagnosis (> 65 years [y] vs. ≤ 65 y), using Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Independent sample t-tests and chi-square analyses were used for univariate comparisons. P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 5142 patients with aUC were identified. 1419 were (28%) female and 575 (11%) were > 65 y. Of those with recorded race (n = 3492), 1% were API, 5% Black, 14% categorized as “other,” and 80% White. There was no difference in PFS (8.7 vs. 9.0 months [m], HR1.03; P = .82) or OS (13.2 vs. 13.5 m; HR1.05, P = .31) between women and men. Women had shorter PFS to men on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (P = .002) but not with other first-line (1L) therapy. API patients had comparable PFS (9.6 vs. 8.9 m; HR0.91; P = .45) but longer OS (28.5 vs. 14.1 m; HR0.56; P = .008) compared to White patients. Black patients had comparable PFS (7.9 vs. 8.5; HR1.06; P = .81) and OS (11.5 vs. 14.1 m; HR1.32; P = .73) vs White patients. Patients > 65 y had shorter PFS to ≤ 65 y (7.6 vs. 9.0 m; HR1.14, P = .019); however, OS was longer in older patients (16.5 vs. 12.8 m; HR0.80, P < .001). Only on 1L ICI, OS was longer in those > 65 y compared to those ≤ 65 y (HR0.71; P = .021)
Conclusion
In this large real-world database, female aUC patients had comparable PFS and OS to males. API patients showed superior OS to White patients. Patients > 65 y had inferior PFS but superior OS to patients ≤ 65 y.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.