Eman S Soliman, Rania Naguib, Fatima Neimatallah, Najd AlKhudhairy, Amjad AlGhamdi, Reema Alqahtani, Khloud Aldashash, Bashayr Alkhalifah, Amal Alhakami
{"title":"Diabetes-related distress among type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Eman S Soliman, Rania Naguib, Fatima Neimatallah, Najd AlKhudhairy, Amjad AlGhamdi, Reema Alqahtani, Khloud Aldashash, Bashayr Alkhalifah, Amal Alhakami","doi":"10.26719/2025.31.6.404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that diabetes negatively affects mental health, and that depression is twice as common among individuals with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate diabetes-related distress and its association with complications, treatment adherence and clinical outcomes in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study collected data from 269 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). The data were analysed using SPSS version 25.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 12.3% of the participants reported diabetes-related high distress (DDS-17 score > 3), 38.7% moderate distress (> 2) and 49.0% little or no distress. The most reported type of distress was regimen-related distress (22.7%), followed by emotional burden (15.6%), physician-related distress (14.9%), and interpersonal distress (10.4%). Treatment adherence was significantly associated with lower distress levels across all domains (P < 0.05). Higher diabetes-related distress scores correlated with elevated haemoglobin A1c levels and diabetes-related complications. Females had significantly more neurologic and more visual complications than males (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show that diabetes-related distress, particularly regimen-related and physician-related distresses, has significant effects on clinical outcomes for type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. There is therefore a need for physicians to integrate diabetes-related distress assessment and management into routine diabetes care, including providing guidance on daily disease management and lifestyle changes as preventive measures for diabetesrelated distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":93985,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit","volume":"31 6","pages":"404-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26719/2025.31.6.404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Studies have shown that diabetes negatively affects mental health, and that depression is twice as common among individuals with diabetes.
Aim: To evaluate diabetes-related distress and its association with complications, treatment adherence and clinical outcomes in Saudi Arabia.
Methods: This cross-sectional study collected data from 269 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). The data were analysed using SPSS version 25.
Results: Overall, 12.3% of the participants reported diabetes-related high distress (DDS-17 score > 3), 38.7% moderate distress (> 2) and 49.0% little or no distress. The most reported type of distress was regimen-related distress (22.7%), followed by emotional burden (15.6%), physician-related distress (14.9%), and interpersonal distress (10.4%). Treatment adherence was significantly associated with lower distress levels across all domains (P < 0.05). Higher diabetes-related distress scores correlated with elevated haemoglobin A1c levels and diabetes-related complications. Females had significantly more neurologic and more visual complications than males (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Our findings show that diabetes-related distress, particularly regimen-related and physician-related distresses, has significant effects on clinical outcomes for type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. There is therefore a need for physicians to integrate diabetes-related distress assessment and management into routine diabetes care, including providing guidance on daily disease management and lifestyle changes as preventive measures for diabetesrelated distress.