Comparison of Medicaid financing for birth centers: a nine-state policy analysis.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-07-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1569462
Rebecca H Ofrane, Leslie Kantor, Julie Blumenfeld, Slawa Rokicki
{"title":"Comparison of Medicaid financing for birth centers: a nine-state policy analysis.","authors":"Rebecca H Ofrane, Leslie Kantor, Julie Blumenfeld, Slawa Rokicki","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1569462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The United States continues to face poor maternal health outcomes, and freestanding birth centers are a safe alternative to hospitals, offering midwifery care for low-risk birthing people. Not all birth centers accept Medicaid patients, however, and among those that do, low Medicaid facility reimbursement rates are a barrier to birth center operations and sustainability. This limits access especially for low-risk birthing people of color who may perceive traditional hospital care to be unsafe or culturally unsupportive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional policy analysis explored variation in U.S. Medicaid reimbursement rates for birth center facility fees. State similarity methods were used to match comparable states to New Jersey due to the state's evolving policy environment, resulting in a nine-state sample for the policy analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of this sample, six had published Medicaid rates for the birth center facility fee, with wide variation among the states, New Jersey's being the lowest and Massachusetts the highest, at four-and-a-half times New Jersey's rate. Significant variation in reimbursement rates was also identified when transfer to a hospital occurs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest the importance of Medicaid reimbursement rates for birth centers as a policy pathway to improving access to this under-utilized care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1569462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1569462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The United States continues to face poor maternal health outcomes, and freestanding birth centers are a safe alternative to hospitals, offering midwifery care for low-risk birthing people. Not all birth centers accept Medicaid patients, however, and among those that do, low Medicaid facility reimbursement rates are a barrier to birth center operations and sustainability. This limits access especially for low-risk birthing people of color who may perceive traditional hospital care to be unsafe or culturally unsupportive.

Methods: This cross-sectional policy analysis explored variation in U.S. Medicaid reimbursement rates for birth center facility fees. State similarity methods were used to match comparable states to New Jersey due to the state's evolving policy environment, resulting in a nine-state sample for the policy analysis.

Results: Of this sample, six had published Medicaid rates for the birth center facility fee, with wide variation among the states, New Jersey's being the lowest and Massachusetts the highest, at four-and-a-half times New Jersey's rate. Significant variation in reimbursement rates was also identified when transfer to a hospital occurs.

Conclusions: The findings suggest the importance of Medicaid reimbursement rates for birth centers as a policy pathway to improving access to this under-utilized care setting.

生育中心医疗补助资金的比较:九州政策分析。
背景:美国继续面临孕产妇健康状况不佳的问题,独立的分娩中心是医院的安全替代选择,为低风险分娩人群提供助产护理。然而,并不是所有的生育中心都接受医疗补助病人,在那些接受医疗补助的生育中心中,医疗补助设施的低报销率是生育中心运营和可持续性的一个障碍。这限制了特别是有色人种的低风险分娩,他们可能认为传统的医院护理不安全或文化上不支持。方法:本横截面政策分析探讨了美国医疗补助报销率对生育中心设施费用的变化。由于新泽西州不断变化的政策环境,使用州相似性方法将可比较的州与新泽西州进行匹配,从而产生用于政策分析的9个州样本。结果:在这个样本中,有六个州公布了生育中心设施费用的医疗补助费率,各州之间差异很大,新泽西州最低,马萨诸塞州最高,是新泽西州的4.5倍。还发现,在转院时,报销率有很大差异。结论:研究结果表明,生育中心的医疗补助报销率作为一种政策途径的重要性,可以改善这种未充分利用的护理环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信