What do people search online about sciatica? What answers do they get from Dr. Google? A mixed analysis of Italian web-based data.

IF 2.9 Q1 REHABILITATION
Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-07-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2025.3360
Massimo Esposto, Matteo Cioeta, Giuseppe Giovannico, Valerio Barbari, Alessandra Arca
{"title":"What do people search online about sciatica? What answers do they get from Dr. Google? A mixed analysis of Italian web-based data.","authors":"Massimo Esposto, Matteo Cioeta, Giuseppe Giovannico, Valerio Barbari, Alessandra Arca","doi":"10.33393/aop.2025.3360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spine-related leg pain (SRLP), also commonly referred to as sciatica, is characterized by many unanswered questions. Nowadays, patients search for information online to find answers not provided by clinicians. Therefore, this work aimed to (i) collect the main questions and keywords searched by the Italian general population related to SRLP, (ii) analyze the content of the most clicked web pages, (iii) investigate its alignment with evidence-based recommendations, and (iv) assess their credibility and (v) readability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SEMrush was used to collect questions, keywords, search volumes, and web pages. Credibility was assessed through the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST). Readability was evaluated by the Gulpease index. Thematic and content analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monthly search volumes ranged from 4,400 to 33,100. QUEST scores ranged from 1 to 14 out of 28. Readability scores ranged from 20 to 47 out of 100. Common themes highlighted the roles of medications and physiotherapy, the value of doing effortless activities, and the importance of sleep. Content analysis showed that 11 codes (41%) were aligned with, 7 (26%) were contradicted by, and 26 (96%) were entirely omitted from at least one web page.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that inaccurate, poorly credible, and difficult-to-read information on SRLP are common online, leading to plausible targets for the educational intervention of clinicians dealing with SRLP patients. Clinicians are now more aware of the questions that their patients could be asking to Google and the answers it provides about SRLP.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"15 ","pages":"195-205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12282466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2025.3360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spine-related leg pain (SRLP), also commonly referred to as sciatica, is characterized by many unanswered questions. Nowadays, patients search for information online to find answers not provided by clinicians. Therefore, this work aimed to (i) collect the main questions and keywords searched by the Italian general population related to SRLP, (ii) analyze the content of the most clicked web pages, (iii) investigate its alignment with evidence-based recommendations, and (iv) assess their credibility and (v) readability.

Methods: SEMrush was used to collect questions, keywords, search volumes, and web pages. Credibility was assessed through the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST). Readability was evaluated by the Gulpease index. Thematic and content analyses were performed.

Results: Monthly search volumes ranged from 4,400 to 33,100. QUEST scores ranged from 1 to 14 out of 28. Readability scores ranged from 20 to 47 out of 100. Common themes highlighted the roles of medications and physiotherapy, the value of doing effortless activities, and the importance of sleep. Content analysis showed that 11 codes (41%) were aligned with, 7 (26%) were contradicted by, and 26 (96%) were entirely omitted from at least one web page.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that inaccurate, poorly credible, and difficult-to-read information on SRLP are common online, leading to plausible targets for the educational intervention of clinicians dealing with SRLP patients. Clinicians are now more aware of the questions that their patients could be asking to Google and the answers it provides about SRLP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

关于坐骨神经痛,人们在网上搜索什么?他们从b谷歌博士那里得到了什么答案?对意大利网络数据的混合分析。
脊柱相关性腿痛(SRLP),通常也被称为坐骨神经痛,其特点是有许多未解的问题。如今,患者在网上搜索信息,寻找临床医生无法提供的答案。因此,这项工作旨在(i)收集意大利普通人群搜索的与SRLP相关的主要问题和关键词,(ii)分析点击最多的网页的内容,(iii)调查其与循证建议的一致性,以及(iv)评估其可信度和(v)可读性。方法:使用SEMrush收集问题、关键词、搜索量和网页。通过质量评价评分工具(QUEST)评估可信性。用Gulpease指数评价可读性。进行了专题和内容分析。结果:月搜索量从4400到33,100。QUEST的得分范围从1到14(满分28分)。可读性得分在20到47分(满分100分)之间。共同的主题强调了药物和物理治疗的作用,做毫不费力的活动的价值,以及睡眠的重要性。内容分析显示,11个(41%)代码与之一致,7个(26%)代码与之矛盾,26个(96%)代码在至少一个网页中被完全遗漏。结论:研究结果表明,网上关于SRLP的信息普遍存在不准确、不可信和难以阅读的问题,这为临床医生处理SRLP患者的教育干预提供了合理的目标。临床医生现在更加了解他们的病人可能会向b谷歌提出的问题,以及它提供的关于SRLP的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信