[Evaluation of electronic nursing process documentation in the acute inpatient setting: A mixed methods convergent parallel design].

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a001046
Simone Elisabeth Gruber, Renate Ranegger
{"title":"[Evaluation of electronic nursing process documentation in the acute inpatient setting: A mixed methods convergent parallel design].","authors":"Simone Elisabeth Gruber, Renate Ranegger","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a001046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluation of electronic nursing process documentation in the acute inpatient setting: A mixed methods convergent parallel design <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> To identify potential improvements in the quality of nursing process documentation, it is essential to record the baseline situation, considering the perspectives of the nursing staff. <i>Aims:</i> The study aimed to evaluate electronic nursing process documentation in an acute inpatient setting, taking into account the views of nursing staff. <i>Methods:</i> A mixed-methods convergent parallel design was applied. In the quantitative part of the study, an extended Q-DIO (Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes) document analysis (n = 30) was conducted and analyzed descriptively. In the qualitative part, semi-structured expert interviews (n = 6) were conducted and analyzed using structured content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were then combined based on the phases of the nursing process and compared for convergence and divergence. <i>Results:</i> The results for the aspects of nursing assessment, nursing diagnoses and nursing goals revealed divergence. For instance, the quantitative data indicated good quality in nursing diagnoses, whereas nurses expressed differing views on the necessity of documenting these diagnoses. Convergences were observed in the planning and implementation of nursing interventions, as well as in nursing evaluation. <i>Conclusions:</i> The evaluation revealed potential for optimization. When implementing the recommendations, human, technical and organizational factors must be considered, as they are interdependent.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a001046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation of electronic nursing process documentation in the acute inpatient setting: A mixed methods convergent parallel design Abstract: Background: To identify potential improvements in the quality of nursing process documentation, it is essential to record the baseline situation, considering the perspectives of the nursing staff. Aims: The study aimed to evaluate electronic nursing process documentation in an acute inpatient setting, taking into account the views of nursing staff. Methods: A mixed-methods convergent parallel design was applied. In the quantitative part of the study, an extended Q-DIO (Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes) document analysis (n = 30) was conducted and analyzed descriptively. In the qualitative part, semi-structured expert interviews (n = 6) were conducted and analyzed using structured content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were then combined based on the phases of the nursing process and compared for convergence and divergence. Results: The results for the aspects of nursing assessment, nursing diagnoses and nursing goals revealed divergence. For instance, the quantitative data indicated good quality in nursing diagnoses, whereas nurses expressed differing views on the necessity of documenting these diagnoses. Convergences were observed in the planning and implementation of nursing interventions, as well as in nursing evaluation. Conclusions: The evaluation revealed potential for optimization. When implementing the recommendations, human, technical and organizational factors must be considered, as they are interdependent.

[评估电子护理过程文件在急性住院设置:一个混合方法收敛平行设计]。
摘要:背景:为了确定护理流程文件质量的潜在改进,有必要记录基线情况,并考虑护理人员的观点。目的:本研究的目的是评估电子护理过程文件在急性住院设置,考虑到护理人员的意见。方法:采用混合方法收敛并行设计。在研究的定量部分,进行了扩展的Q-DIO(护理诊断、干预和结局的质量)文献分析(n = 30),并进行了描述性分析。定性部分采用半结构化的专家访谈(n = 6),采用结构化内容分析法进行分析。然后根据护理过程的阶段将定量和定性结果结合起来,并比较趋同和分歧。结果:在护理评价、护理诊断、护理目标等方面结果存在差异。例如,定量数据表明护理诊断质量良好,而护士对记录这些诊断的必要性表达了不同的看法。在护理干预措施的规划和实施以及护理评估方面观察到趋同。结论:评价显示了优化的潜力。在执行这些建议时,必须考虑到人、技术和组织因素,因为它们是相互依存的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信