Comparing shoulder muscle activity in symptomatic and asymptomatic groups: the influence of normalization technique.

Abstract

Maximum voluntary contractions (MVCs) are the standard normalization method for muscle activity, but can be hindered by pain and injury. Submaximal normalization may be a viable option. The study objective was to compare muscle activation between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups with MVC and submaximal normalization to determine if similar relative between-groups differences could be detected. Eighteen participants, divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, performed isometric MVCs and six dynamic functional tasks. EMG data were normalized using MVC and submaximal values from a weighted overhead lift. MVCs achieved higher activation levels for most muscles, but submaximal normalization provided comparable values for serratus anterior. Significant between-group differences were observed during the Comb Hair, with higher activation in the symptomatic group for the upper trapezius, middle trapezius, and supraspinatus across both normalizations. The serratus anterior during the Overhead Reach and lower trapezius in the Tie Apron were also different between groups with both normalizations. There were some significant findings that emerged from only one normalization method. Submaximal normalization may be a viable alternative to MVC normalization for select muscles and upper limb pathological populations. Submaximal normalization allowed for meaningful comparisons of muscle activation patterns during functional tasks without the need for maximum force exertion.