Maia Hirsch, Brigitte Jacoby, Samantha Pierce, Jason MacMore, Jeremy D Schmahmann
{"title":"The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale: Updates and Insights.","authors":"Maia Hirsch, Brigitte Jacoby, Samantha Pierce, Jason MacMore, Jeremy D Schmahmann","doi":"10.1007/s12311-025-01890-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective / Schmahmann Syndrome scale (CCAS-S) detects cognitive and neuropsychiatric changes in cerebellar disease (CD). It has good sensitivity and specificity, but a false positive rate ~ 5%. We determined that healthy controls (HC) fail digit span tasks (DS) when presented with one repetition opportunity. We tested the hypothesis that providing participants a second attempt at DS would improve performance and decrease false positive rate. We also evaluated influence of age and education on CCAS-S scores. We administered the CCAS-S to 50 CD and 85 HC, providing a second attempt at forward / reverse DS for each failed number sequence, using either the same numbers, or a different set of numbers of the same length. Performance with same vs different digits was identical. After second DS attempt, raw score increased: HC, 106.1 ± 9.4 to 106.8 ± 9.2; CD, 89.2 ± 15.5 to 90.6 ± 15.8, and failed domains decreased: HC, 0.67 ± 0.89 to 0.4 ± 0.73; CD, 2.62 ± 1.9 to 2.24 ± 1.9. False positive definite CCAS (≥ 3 failed domains) decreased in HC, 4.7% to 1.2%. In CD, definite CCAS remained high, 48% to 38%. Some older HC failed ≥ 3 domains. Education (all ≥ 12 years) did not impact performance in HC; CD with more education failed fewer domains. False positive definite CCAS-S was reduced to 1.2% by second attempt at forward and backward DS. The CCAS-S detected incipient cognitive impairment in older individuals. Education effects were modest, but cohorts with education ≤ 11 years need further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50706,"journal":{"name":"Cerebellum","volume":"24 5","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebellum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-025-01890-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective / Schmahmann Syndrome scale (CCAS-S) detects cognitive and neuropsychiatric changes in cerebellar disease (CD). It has good sensitivity and specificity, but a false positive rate ~ 5%. We determined that healthy controls (HC) fail digit span tasks (DS) when presented with one repetition opportunity. We tested the hypothesis that providing participants a second attempt at DS would improve performance and decrease false positive rate. We also evaluated influence of age and education on CCAS-S scores. We administered the CCAS-S to 50 CD and 85 HC, providing a second attempt at forward / reverse DS for each failed number sequence, using either the same numbers, or a different set of numbers of the same length. Performance with same vs different digits was identical. After second DS attempt, raw score increased: HC, 106.1 ± 9.4 to 106.8 ± 9.2; CD, 89.2 ± 15.5 to 90.6 ± 15.8, and failed domains decreased: HC, 0.67 ± 0.89 to 0.4 ± 0.73; CD, 2.62 ± 1.9 to 2.24 ± 1.9. False positive definite CCAS (≥ 3 failed domains) decreased in HC, 4.7% to 1.2%. In CD, definite CCAS remained high, 48% to 38%. Some older HC failed ≥ 3 domains. Education (all ≥ 12 years) did not impact performance in HC; CD with more education failed fewer domains. False positive definite CCAS-S was reduced to 1.2% by second attempt at forward and backward DS. The CCAS-S detected incipient cognitive impairment in older individuals. Education effects were modest, but cohorts with education ≤ 11 years need further study.
期刊介绍:
Official publication of the Society for Research on the Cerebellum devoted to genetics of cerebellar ataxias, role of cerebellum in motor control and cognitive function, and amid an ageing population, diseases associated with cerebellar dysfunction.
The Cerebellum is a central source for the latest developments in fundamental neurosciences including molecular and cellular biology; behavioural neurosciences and neurochemistry; genetics; fundamental and clinical neurophysiology; neurology and neuropathology; cognition and neuroimaging.
The Cerebellum benefits neuroscientists in molecular and cellular biology; neurophysiologists; researchers in neurotransmission; neurologists; radiologists; paediatricians; neuropsychologists; students of neurology and psychiatry and others.