Exploring Dutch citizens' perspectives, expectations, and decision-making regarding health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT).

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Danny Bruins, Suzanne M Onstwedder, Martina C Cornel, Marc H W van Mil, Margreet G E M Ausems, Olga C Damman, Tessel Rigter
{"title":"Exploring Dutch citizens' perspectives, expectations, and decision-making regarding health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT).","authors":"Danny Bruins, Suzanne M Onstwedder, Martina C Cornel, Marc H W van Mil, Margreet G E M Ausems, Olga C Damman, Tessel Rigter","doi":"10.1159/000547527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Qualitative insights into European citizens' beliefs, expectations, attitudes, and factors relevant for decision-making regarding health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) are scarce. Assessment thereof is essential to eventually empower them for informed decision-making and responsible use regarding DTC-GT. Materials &amp; Methods: Twenty semi-structured, in-person interviews were conducted with a cohort of socio-demographically diverse Dutch citizens. During the interview, participants viewed an informative video regarding DTC-GT to ensure baseline knowledge, and hypothetical company materials, including an estimated disease risk, to assess the reactions of citizens to such materials. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were generally unaware of health-related DTC-GT prior to the interview invite. Participants expressed sizeable expectations across the entire DTC-GT consumer journey, and demonstrated several recurring misconceptions. Participants also indicated distrust towards DTC-GT sellers and their practices, and expressed dissatisfaction concerning the hypothetical results they received. Most participants indicated they would not be willing to undergo DTC-GT, but provided argumentation and weight of each argument were unique to each participant, indicating unique decision-making processes. Price was an important modifying factor in participants' decision-making. Participants suggested information provision by independent parties, development of quality marks, and implementation of enforceable regulation and legislation to support their decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants' expectations regarding health-related DTC-GT and towards DTC-GT sellers appear sizeable, and decision-making very personal. Stimulating informed decision-making through enhancement of information provision, (social) media campaigns, education, development of quality marks, and implementation of enforceable regulation and legislation, could aid in empowering citizens for responsible use of DTC-GT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Qualitative insights into European citizens' beliefs, expectations, attitudes, and factors relevant for decision-making regarding health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) are scarce. Assessment thereof is essential to eventually empower them for informed decision-making and responsible use regarding DTC-GT. Materials & Methods: Twenty semi-structured, in-person interviews were conducted with a cohort of socio-demographically diverse Dutch citizens. During the interview, participants viewed an informative video regarding DTC-GT to ensure baseline knowledge, and hypothetical company materials, including an estimated disease risk, to assess the reactions of citizens to such materials. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed.

Results: Participants were generally unaware of health-related DTC-GT prior to the interview invite. Participants expressed sizeable expectations across the entire DTC-GT consumer journey, and demonstrated several recurring misconceptions. Participants also indicated distrust towards DTC-GT sellers and their practices, and expressed dissatisfaction concerning the hypothetical results they received. Most participants indicated they would not be willing to undergo DTC-GT, but provided argumentation and weight of each argument were unique to each participant, indicating unique decision-making processes. Price was an important modifying factor in participants' decision-making. Participants suggested information provision by independent parties, development of quality marks, and implementation of enforceable regulation and legislation to support their decision-making.

Conclusions: Participants' expectations regarding health-related DTC-GT and towards DTC-GT sellers appear sizeable, and decision-making very personal. Stimulating informed decision-making through enhancement of information provision, (social) media campaigns, education, development of quality marks, and implementation of enforceable regulation and legislation, could aid in empowering citizens for responsible use of DTC-GT.

探索荷兰公民对健康相关的直接面向消费者的基因检测(DTC-GT)的观点、期望和决策。
关于欧洲公民的信念、期望、态度和与健康相关的直接面向消费者的基因检测(DTC-GT)决策相关的因素的定性见解是稀缺的。对其进行评估是至关重要的,以便最终使他们能够对DTC-GT作出明智的决策和负责任的使用。材料,方法:对一群社会人口统计学上不同的荷兰公民进行了20次半结构化的面对面访谈。在面谈期间,与会者观看了关于DTC-GT的资料性视频,以确保了解基线知识,并观看了假想的公司材料,包括估计的疾病风险,以评估公民对此类材料的反应。采访被逐字记录下来,并按主题进行分析。结果:在访谈邀请之前,参与者通常不知道与健康相关的DTC-GT。参与者在整个DTC-GT消费者旅程中表达了相当大的期望,并展示了几个反复出现的误解。嘉宾亦表示不信任DTC-GT卖家和他们的做法,并对他们收到的假设结果表示不满。大多数参与者表示他们不愿意接受DTC-GT,但每个参与者提供的论据和每个论点的权重是独一无二的,表明独特的决策过程。价格是影响参与者决策的重要修正因素。与会者建议由独立机构提供信息,发展质量标志,实施可执行的法规和立法,以支持他们的决策。结论:参与者对与健康相关的DTC-GT和对DTC-GT销售商的期望似乎相当大,决策非常个人化。通过加强信息提供、(社会)媒体宣传、教育、开发质量标志以及实施可执行的法规和立法,促进知情决策,可以帮助公民负责任地使用DTC-GT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信