Limitations of glycated hemoglobin and emerging biomarkers for diabetes care after bariatric surgery.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Uchenna Esther Okpete, Haewon Byeon
{"title":"Limitations of glycated hemoglobin and emerging biomarkers for diabetes care after bariatric surgery.","authors":"Uchenna Esther Okpete, Haewon Byeon","doi":"10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bariatric surgery significantly improves glycemic control and can lead to type 2 diabetes remission. However, the reliability of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a type 2 diabetes biomarker post-surgery can be confounded by conditions such as anemia and gastrointestinal complications. Hence, we explored the use of alternative biomarkers such as glycated albumin (GA), 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) to monitor glycemic control more effectively in post-bariatric surgery patients. Measuring GA and 1,5-AG levels can detect glycemic variability more sensitively than HbA1c, especially under non-fasting conditions. GA shows promise for short-term monitoring post-surgery while 1,5-AG could be useful for real-time glucose monitoring. IGFBP-1 can be used to monitor metabolic improvement and to predict HbA1c normalization. However, challenges in assay standardization and cost remain significant barriers to their clinical adoption. Although these biomarkers could offer a more personalized approach to glucose monitoring (thereby addressing the limitations of utilizing HbA1c in this endeavor in post-bariatric surgery patients), this would require overcoming technical, logistical, and cost-related challenges. While using GA, 1,5-AG, and IGFBP-1 shows promise for glycemic monitoring, further research and validation are crucial for their routine clinical implementation, especially in the context of diabetes management post-bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48607,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Diabetes","volume":"16 7","pages":"107928"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bariatric surgery significantly improves glycemic control and can lead to type 2 diabetes remission. However, the reliability of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a type 2 diabetes biomarker post-surgery can be confounded by conditions such as anemia and gastrointestinal complications. Hence, we explored the use of alternative biomarkers such as glycated albumin (GA), 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) to monitor glycemic control more effectively in post-bariatric surgery patients. Measuring GA and 1,5-AG levels can detect glycemic variability more sensitively than HbA1c, especially under non-fasting conditions. GA shows promise for short-term monitoring post-surgery while 1,5-AG could be useful for real-time glucose monitoring. IGFBP-1 can be used to monitor metabolic improvement and to predict HbA1c normalization. However, challenges in assay standardization and cost remain significant barriers to their clinical adoption. Although these biomarkers could offer a more personalized approach to glucose monitoring (thereby addressing the limitations of utilizing HbA1c in this endeavor in post-bariatric surgery patients), this would require overcoming technical, logistical, and cost-related challenges. While using GA, 1,5-AG, and IGFBP-1 shows promise for glycemic monitoring, further research and validation are crucial for their routine clinical implementation, especially in the context of diabetes management post-bariatric surgery.

糖化血红蛋白和新兴生物标志物在减肥手术后糖尿病护理中的局限性。
减肥手术可显著改善血糖控制,并可导致2型糖尿病缓解。然而,手术后糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)作为2型糖尿病生物标志物的可靠性可能会受到贫血和胃肠道并发症等情况的影响。因此,我们探索了替代生物标志物的使用,如糖化白蛋白(GA)、1,5-无氢葡萄糖醇(1,5- ag)和胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-1 (IGFBP-1),以更有效地监测减肥手术后患者的血糖控制。测量GA和1,5- ag水平可以比HbA1c更敏感地检测血糖变异性,特别是在非空腹条件下。GA有望用于术后短期监测,而1,5- ag可用于实时血糖监测。IGFBP-1可用于监测代谢改善和预测HbA1c正常化。然而,在检测标准化和成本方面的挑战仍然是其临床应用的重大障碍。虽然这些生物标志物可以提供一种更加个性化的血糖监测方法(从而解决了在减肥手术后患者中使用糖化血红蛋白的局限性),但这需要克服技术、后勤和成本相关的挑战。虽然使用GA, 1,5- ag和IGFBP-1显示出血糖监测的前景,但进一步的研究和验证对于其常规临床实施至关重要,特别是在减肥手术后糖尿病管理的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Diabetes
World Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
自引率
2.40%
发文量
909
期刊介绍: The WJD is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJD is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of diabetes. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJD is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJD are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in diabetes. Scope: Diabetes Complications, Experimental Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes, Gestational, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diabetic Cardiomyopathies, Diabetic Coma, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetic Neuropathies, Donohue Syndrome, Fetal Macrosomia, and Prediabetic State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信