Lumateperone monotherapy for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder: efficacy and safety in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Christoph U Correll, Suresh Durgam, Susan G Kozauer, Hassan D Lakkis, Changzheng Chen, Kimberly E Vanover, Sharon Mates, Robert E Davis
{"title":"Lumateperone monotherapy for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder: efficacy and safety in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Christoph U Correll, Suresh Durgam, Susan G Kozauer, Hassan D Lakkis, Changzheng Chen, Kimberly E Vanover, Sharon Mates, Robert E Davis","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone to treat bipolar depression. Patients (18-75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode were randomized 1:1:1 to 6-week lumateperone 28 mg (n = 183), lumateperone 42 mg (n = 185), or placebo (n = 186). Primary and key secondary endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score and time to first sustained response (≥50% reduction from baseline in MADRS Total score), respectively. Safety assessments included adverse events, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), laboratory evaluations, and vital signs. Neither dose of lumateperone achieved significant improvement vs. placebo (P > 0.05) in the primary endpoint (MADRS Total score, least squares mean difference vs. placebo: 28 mg, 0.9; 42 mg, -1.0) or in the key secondary endpoint (MADRS Total time to first sustained response hazard ratio vs. placebo: 28 mg, 1.00; 42 mg, 0.93), likely due to a high placebo response. Both lumateperone doses were well tolerated, with low EPS risk and minimal changes in weight, prolactin, and cardiometabolic or endocrine parameters. While study efficacy objectives were not met, both doses of lumateperone were generally safe and well tolerated in patients with bipolar depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone to treat bipolar depression. Patients (18-75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode were randomized 1:1:1 to 6-week lumateperone 28 mg (n = 183), lumateperone 42 mg (n = 185), or placebo (n = 186). Primary and key secondary endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score and time to first sustained response (≥50% reduction from baseline in MADRS Total score), respectively. Safety assessments included adverse events, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), laboratory evaluations, and vital signs. Neither dose of lumateperone achieved significant improvement vs. placebo (P > 0.05) in the primary endpoint (MADRS Total score, least squares mean difference vs. placebo: 28 mg, 0.9; 42 mg, -1.0) or in the key secondary endpoint (MADRS Total time to first sustained response hazard ratio vs. placebo: 28 mg, 1.00; 42 mg, 0.93), likely due to a high placebo response. Both lumateperone doses were well tolerated, with low EPS risk and minimal changes in weight, prolactin, and cardiometabolic or endocrine parameters. While study efficacy objectives were not met, both doses of lumateperone were generally safe and well tolerated in patients with bipolar depression.

Lumateperone单药治疗双相情感障碍相关重度抑郁发作:一项随机安慰剂对照试验的疗效和安全性
这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期研究评估了lumateperone治疗双相抑郁症的有效性和安全性。经历重度抑郁发作的双相I型或双相II型患者(18-75岁)以1:1:1的比例随机分为28 mg (n = 183)、42 mg (n = 185)或安慰剂(n = 186)。主要终点和关键次要终点分别是Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总得分和首次持续反应时间(MADRS总得分比基线减少≥50%)从基线到第43天的变化。安全性评估包括不良事件、锥体外系症状(EPS)、实验室评估和生命体征。在主要终点(MADRS总评分,最小二乘平均差值与安慰剂相比:28 mg, 0.9;42 mg, -1.0)或在关键次要终点(MADRS),总时间到首次持续反应的风险比与安慰剂:28 mg, 1.00;42毫克,0.93),可能是由于高安慰剂反应。两种剂量的lumateperone耐受性良好,EPS风险低,体重、催乳素、心脏代谢或内分泌参数变化最小。虽然没有达到研究的疗效目标,但在双相抑郁症患者中,两种剂量的lumateperone总体上是安全的,耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
23.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Clinical Psychopharmacology provides an essential link between research and clinical practice throughout psychopharmacology. It reports on studies in human subjects, both healthy volunteers and patients, which relate the effects of drugs on psychological processes. A major objective of the journal is to publish fully refereed papers which throw light on the ways in which the study of psychotropic drugs can increase our understanding of psychopharmacology. To this end the journal publishes results of early Phase I and II studies, as well as those of controlled clinical trials of psychotropic drugs in Phase II and IV. Other topics covered include the epidemiology of psychotropic drug prescribing and drug taking, the sociology of psychotropic drugs including compliance, and research into the safety and adverse effects of these compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信