Christoph U Correll, Suresh Durgam, Susan G Kozauer, Hassan D Lakkis, Changzheng Chen, Kimberly E Vanover, Sharon Mates, Robert E Davis
{"title":"Lumateperone monotherapy for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder: efficacy and safety in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Christoph U Correll, Suresh Durgam, Susan G Kozauer, Hassan D Lakkis, Changzheng Chen, Kimberly E Vanover, Sharon Mates, Robert E Davis","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone to treat bipolar depression. Patients (18-75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode were randomized 1:1:1 to 6-week lumateperone 28 mg (n = 183), lumateperone 42 mg (n = 185), or placebo (n = 186). Primary and key secondary endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score and time to first sustained response (≥50% reduction from baseline in MADRS Total score), respectively. Safety assessments included adverse events, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), laboratory evaluations, and vital signs. Neither dose of lumateperone achieved significant improvement vs. placebo (P > 0.05) in the primary endpoint (MADRS Total score, least squares mean difference vs. placebo: 28 mg, 0.9; 42 mg, -1.0) or in the key secondary endpoint (MADRS Total time to first sustained response hazard ratio vs. placebo: 28 mg, 1.00; 42 mg, 0.93), likely due to a high placebo response. Both lumateperone doses were well tolerated, with low EPS risk and minimal changes in weight, prolactin, and cardiometabolic or endocrine parameters. While study efficacy objectives were not met, both doses of lumateperone were generally safe and well tolerated in patients with bipolar depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone to treat bipolar depression. Patients (18-75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode were randomized 1:1:1 to 6-week lumateperone 28 mg (n = 183), lumateperone 42 mg (n = 185), or placebo (n = 186). Primary and key secondary endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score and time to first sustained response (≥50% reduction from baseline in MADRS Total score), respectively. Safety assessments included adverse events, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), laboratory evaluations, and vital signs. Neither dose of lumateperone achieved significant improvement vs. placebo (P > 0.05) in the primary endpoint (MADRS Total score, least squares mean difference vs. placebo: 28 mg, 0.9; 42 mg, -1.0) or in the key secondary endpoint (MADRS Total time to first sustained response hazard ratio vs. placebo: 28 mg, 1.00; 42 mg, 0.93), likely due to a high placebo response. Both lumateperone doses were well tolerated, with low EPS risk and minimal changes in weight, prolactin, and cardiometabolic or endocrine parameters. While study efficacy objectives were not met, both doses of lumateperone were generally safe and well tolerated in patients with bipolar depression.
期刊介绍:
International Clinical Psychopharmacology provides an essential link between research and clinical practice throughout psychopharmacology. It reports on studies in human subjects, both healthy volunteers and patients, which relate the effects of drugs on psychological processes.
A major objective of the journal is to publish fully refereed papers which throw light on the ways in which the study of psychotropic drugs can increase our understanding of psychopharmacology. To this end the journal publishes results of early Phase I and II studies, as well as those of controlled clinical trials of psychotropic drugs in Phase II and IV. Other topics covered include the epidemiology of psychotropic drug prescribing and drug taking, the sociology of psychotropic drugs including compliance, and research into the safety and adverse effects of these compounds.