Low-Dose Aspirin and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: Is It Worthwhile? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ana Luísa Areia, Miguel Areia, Anabela Mota-Pinto
{"title":"Low-Dose Aspirin and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: Is It Worthwhile? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ana Luísa Areia, Miguel Areia, Anabela Mota-Pinto","doi":"10.1159/000546964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to its anti-inflammatory properties, low-dose aspirin (LDA) has been theorized to mitigate spontaneous preterm birth (PTB). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to report the available evidence to determine whether LDA administration prevents any spontaneous PTB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register, and Web of Science databases were searched, and the protocol was registered within the PROSPERO database (CRD42021288021). Data were examined using Review Manager 5.4 Software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 261 relevant articles, from which 11 pertinent studies were included in this meta-analysis. While LDA showed a reduction of spontaneous PTB rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.04), the results lacked statistical significance. Nevertheless, LDA significantly reduced the rate of spontaneous PTB <34 weeks (6 studies; OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78-0.93). Also, subgroup analysis of high-risk women (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.78-1.17) and healthy women (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.79-1.04) showed that LDA had a non-significant trend to reduce spontaneous PTB rates. Moreover, there was a statistically significant reduction in spontaneous PTB when LDA administration was initiated before 16 weeks (5 studies; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-0.98), although not for LDA dosages below 100 mg (9 studies; OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.91-1.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis indicates a statistically significant reduction in spontaneous PTB rates associated with LDA administration only in spontaneous PTB pregnancies before 34 weeks (not any spontaneous PTB) and for LDA administration starting before 16 weeks. Although LDA can potentially prevent any spontaneous PTB, further well-conducted trials focussing specifically on this subgroup are warranted to provide robust evidence of its efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Due to its anti-inflammatory properties, low-dose aspirin (LDA) has been theorized to mitigate spontaneous preterm birth (PTB). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to report the available evidence to determine whether LDA administration prevents any spontaneous PTB.

Methods: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register, and Web of Science databases were searched, and the protocol was registered within the PROSPERO database (CRD42021288021). Data were examined using Review Manager 5.4 Software.

Results: The search yielded 261 relevant articles, from which 11 pertinent studies were included in this meta-analysis. While LDA showed a reduction of spontaneous PTB rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.04), the results lacked statistical significance. Nevertheless, LDA significantly reduced the rate of spontaneous PTB <34 weeks (6 studies; OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78-0.93). Also, subgroup analysis of high-risk women (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.78-1.17) and healthy women (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.79-1.04) showed that LDA had a non-significant trend to reduce spontaneous PTB rates. Moreover, there was a statistically significant reduction in spontaneous PTB when LDA administration was initiated before 16 weeks (5 studies; OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-0.98), although not for LDA dosages below 100 mg (9 studies; OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.91-1.03).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates a statistically significant reduction in spontaneous PTB rates associated with LDA administration only in spontaneous PTB pregnancies before 34 weeks (not any spontaneous PTB) and for LDA administration starting before 16 weeks. Although LDA can potentially prevent any spontaneous PTB, further well-conducted trials focussing specifically on this subgroup are warranted to provide robust evidence of its efficacy.

低剂量阿司匹林与预防自发性早产:值得吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:由于其抗炎特性,低剂量阿司匹林(LDA)理论上可以减轻自发性早产(PTB)。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在报告现有证据,以确定LDA是否可以预防任何自发性PTB。方法:检索Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Central Register和Web of Science数据库,并在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42021288021)中注册该协议。使用Review Manager 5.4软件对数据进行检查。结果:检索到261篇相关文章,其中11篇相关研究被纳入本荟萃分析。而LDA显示自发性肺结核发病率降低(优势比OR 0.93;95% CI 0.84-1.04),结果缺乏统计学意义。然而,LDA显著降低自发性PTB < 34周的发生率(6项研究;或0.85;95% ci 0.78-0.93)。此外,高危女性的亚组分析(OR 0.96;95% CI 0.78-1.17)和健康女性(OR 0.91;95% CI 0.79-1.04)显示LDA降低自发性肺结核发病率的趋势不显著。此外,在16周之前开始服用LDA,自发性PTB的发生率有统计学意义的降低(5项研究;或0.91;95% CI 0.83-0.98),但LDA剂量低于100 mg(9项研究;或0.97;95% ci 0.91-1.03)。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,仅在34周前妊娠的自发性PTB(没有任何自发性PTB)和16周前开始服用LDA,与LDA相关的自发性PTB发病率有统计学意义的降低。尽管LDA可以潜在地预防任何自发性PTB,但进一步针对这一亚组进行的良好试验有必要提供其有效性的有力证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信