Classifying the Integration of Healthcare Providers and Insurers

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1002/hec.70019
Xiaodan Liang, John Mullahy
{"title":"Classifying the Integration of Healthcare Providers and Insurers","authors":"Xiaodan Liang,&nbsp;John Mullahy","doi":"10.1002/hec.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The value-based payment reform prompted by the Affordable Care Act has stimulated vertical integrations of healthcare providers and insurers. The consequences of these integrations may vary significantly depending on the markets and entities involved. This article points out the limitations of familiar binary classifications for provider-insurer integrations in prior studies. To address these limitations, we propose a framework and taxonomy that include four key aspects for examining variations in provider-insurer integrations. The first is from the care delivery perspective; it sheds light on levels of care services owned by an integrated system and their variation across regions within the system. The second is from the insurance markets' perspective; it pertains to insurance markets in which an integrated system competes. The third is from the organizational perspective; it points out that whether the insurer or the provider is dominant in an integrated system may affect the system's priorities—care delivery reform or cost containment. The last highlights the dynamics of integrated systems that can involve the other three. We offer these insights and their possible applications hoping to sharpen discussion and research on provider-insurer integrations, and to assist antitrust agencies in evaluating relevant legal cases under the 2023 Merger Guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 11","pages":"1971-1976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hec.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The value-based payment reform prompted by the Affordable Care Act has stimulated vertical integrations of healthcare providers and insurers. The consequences of these integrations may vary significantly depending on the markets and entities involved. This article points out the limitations of familiar binary classifications for provider-insurer integrations in prior studies. To address these limitations, we propose a framework and taxonomy that include four key aspects for examining variations in provider-insurer integrations. The first is from the care delivery perspective; it sheds light on levels of care services owned by an integrated system and their variation across regions within the system. The second is from the insurance markets' perspective; it pertains to insurance markets in which an integrated system competes. The third is from the organizational perspective; it points out that whether the insurer or the provider is dominant in an integrated system may affect the system's priorities—care delivery reform or cost containment. The last highlights the dynamics of integrated systems that can involve the other three. We offer these insights and their possible applications hoping to sharpen discussion and research on provider-insurer integrations, and to assist antitrust agencies in evaluating relevant legal cases under the 2023 Merger Guidelines.

Abstract Image

医疗保健提供者和保险公司的整合分类。
《平价医疗法案》推动的基于价值的支付改革刺激了医疗保健提供者和保险公司的垂直整合。根据所涉及的市场和实体的不同,这些整合的结果可能会有很大的不同。本文指出了以往研究中常用的二元分类方法对提供者-保险人整合的局限性。为了解决这些限制,我们提出了一个框架和分类法,其中包括用于检查提供者-保险公司集成中的变化的四个关键方面。第一个是从护理提供的角度;它揭示了综合系统所拥有的护理服务水平及其在系统内各区域之间的差异。二是从保险市场的角度;它适用于一个综合系统竞争的保险市场。三是从组织角度;报告指出,在一个综合系统中,保险公司或提供者是否占主导地位可能会影响系统的优先事项——医疗服务改革或成本控制。最后一个强调了集成系统的动态,它可以涉及其他三个。我们提供这些见解及其可能的应用,希望能加强对供应商-保险公司整合的讨论和研究,并协助反垄断机构根据2023年合并指南评估相关法律案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信