Anatomical feasibility of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on post-TAVR CT imaging.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tohru Takaseya, Ken-Ichiro Sasaki, Naoki Itaya, Masahiro Sasaki, Kensuke Oshita, Michiko Yokomizo, Yoshihiro Fukumoto, Eiki Tayama
{"title":"Anatomical feasibility of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on post-TAVR CT imaging.","authors":"Tohru Takaseya, Ken-Ichiro Sasaki, Naoki Itaya, Masahiro Sasaki, Kensuke Oshita, Michiko Yokomizo, Yoshihiro Fukumoto, Eiki Tayama","doi":"10.1007/s11748-025-02183-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>One of the risks of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement is coronary artery obstruction caused by the cusps of the first transcatheter aortic valve. We evaluated the feasibility of this procedure based on data from post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement computed tomography scans. We also evaluated whether redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement could be a standard lifetime management option for patients with severe aortic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement computed tomography data of 143 patients who received balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves and 187 patients who received self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves were analyzed. The risk of coronary obstruction in redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement, defined by the transcatheter aortic valve commissure level above the coronary height and a transcatheter aortic valve-to-aorta distance of < 2.0 mm in each coronary sinus, was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 85.5 ± 5.1 years (35% male), and the mean body surface area was 1.43 ± 0.17 m<sup>2</sup>. The percentage of patients at a high risk of coronary obstruction was significantly higher in the self-expanding valve group (71.1%) than in the balloon-expandable valve group (32.2%). In both the balloon-expandable and self-expanding valve groups, the group at a high risk of coronary obstruction had smaller aortic roots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current transcatheter aortic valve devices may carry a higher risk of coronary obstruction in patients with small aortic roots. Careful patient selection and comprehensive pre-procedural assessment are necessary to reduce the risk for the patients' lifetime management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12585,"journal":{"name":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-025-02183-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: One of the risks of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement is coronary artery obstruction caused by the cusps of the first transcatheter aortic valve. We evaluated the feasibility of this procedure based on data from post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement computed tomography scans. We also evaluated whether redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement could be a standard lifetime management option for patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Methods: The post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement computed tomography data of 143 patients who received balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves and 187 patients who received self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves were analyzed. The risk of coronary obstruction in redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement, defined by the transcatheter aortic valve commissure level above the coronary height and a transcatheter aortic valve-to-aorta distance of < 2.0 mm in each coronary sinus, was evaluated.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 85.5 ± 5.1 years (35% male), and the mean body surface area was 1.43 ± 0.17 m2. The percentage of patients at a high risk of coronary obstruction was significantly higher in the self-expanding valve group (71.1%) than in the balloon-expandable valve group (32.2%). In both the balloon-expandable and self-expanding valve groups, the group at a high risk of coronary obstruction had smaller aortic roots.

Conclusions: Current transcatheter aortic valve devices may carry a higher risk of coronary obstruction in patients with small aortic roots. Careful patient selection and comprehensive pre-procedural assessment are necessary to reduce the risk for the patients' lifetime management.

基于tavr后CT成像的重做经导管主动脉瓣置换术的解剖学可行性。
目的:重做经导管主动脉瓣置换术的风险之一是由第一个经导管主动脉瓣尖引起的冠状动脉阻塞。我们根据经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的计算机断层扫描数据评估了该手术的可行性。我们还评估了重做经导管主动脉瓣置换术是否可以作为严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的标准终身治疗选择。方法:分析143例经导管球囊扩张主动脉瓣置换术患者和187例经导管自扩张主动脉瓣置换术患者经导管置换术后的ct资料。再次行经导管主动脉瓣置换术发生冠状动脉阻塞的风险,以经导管主动脉瓣连接高度高于冠状动脉高度和经导管主动脉瓣至主动脉距离为标准。结果:患者平均年龄85.5±5.1岁(男性占35%),平均体表面积1.43±0.17 m2。自扩张瓣膜组发生冠状动脉梗阻的高危患者比例(71.1%)明显高于球囊扩张瓣膜组(32.2%)。在球囊扩张瓣膜组和自扩张瓣膜组中,冠状动脉阻塞高风险组的主动脉根较小。结论:目前的经导管主动脉瓣装置可能增加小主动脉根患者冠状动脉阻塞的风险。谨慎的患者选择和全面的术前评估是降低患者终身管理风险的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: The General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is the official publication of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, the affiliated journal of The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, that publishes clinical and experimental studies in fields related to thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信