The sole use of stem cells in treating fracture nonunion: a scoping review.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mads Riishede Hansen, Ming Ding, Steffen Søndergaard Folkvardsen, Susanne Gjørup Sækmose, Søren Kold, Bjarke Viberg, Chris Halling Dreyer
{"title":"The sole use of stem cells in treating fracture nonunion: a scoping review.","authors":"Mads Riishede Hansen, Ming Ding, Steffen Søndergaard Folkvardsen, Susanne Gjørup Sækmose, Søren Kold, Bjarke Viberg, Chris Halling Dreyer","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05922-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective of this study: </strong>This scoping-review aims to highlight the current modalities of sole use of stem cells in treating fracture nonunion updating a previous systematic review from 2013. We report solitary stem cell stimulation in literature in vivo studies to obtain current knowledge in understanding the crucial role of stem cells in enhancing fracture nonunion healing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted by systematical search in PubMed, Medline and clinicaltrials.gov with a timeframe from October 2012 to September 2024. Two authors independently screened all articles, and when included, the following information was extracted: type of nonunion, localization, type of stem cells, administered dose of stem cells, surgical information, type of scaffold, control group, evaluation method, time of evaluation post intervention, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4710 articles screened, 27 articles met the criteria for inclusion. In the reviewed articles, 2 out of 5 human studies, and 8 out of 12 animal studies with a control group reported a statistically significant effect of stem cells on bone healing when used in the treatment of fracture nonunion. Comparison of the studies was difficult due to heterogeneity. The administration of mesenchymal stem cells regarding adverse events was investigated in eight human studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our reporting, the articles suggest that the perspectives of the sole use of mesenchymal stem cells in the management of fracture nonunion might be promising but remain inconclusive. Future research should be inspired by existing literature and focus on the development of well-standardized methodologies and results published.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05922-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective of this study: This scoping-review aims to highlight the current modalities of sole use of stem cells in treating fracture nonunion updating a previous systematic review from 2013. We report solitary stem cell stimulation in literature in vivo studies to obtain current knowledge in understanding the crucial role of stem cells in enhancing fracture nonunion healing.

Materials and methods: This scoping review was conducted by systematical search in PubMed, Medline and clinicaltrials.gov with a timeframe from October 2012 to September 2024. Two authors independently screened all articles, and when included, the following information was extracted: type of nonunion, localization, type of stem cells, administered dose of stem cells, surgical information, type of scaffold, control group, evaluation method, time of evaluation post intervention, and adverse events.

Results: Of 4710 articles screened, 27 articles met the criteria for inclusion. In the reviewed articles, 2 out of 5 human studies, and 8 out of 12 animal studies with a control group reported a statistically significant effect of stem cells on bone healing when used in the treatment of fracture nonunion. Comparison of the studies was difficult due to heterogeneity. The administration of mesenchymal stem cells regarding adverse events was investigated in eight human studies.

Conclusion: Based on our reporting, the articles suggest that the perspectives of the sole use of mesenchymal stem cells in the management of fracture nonunion might be promising but remain inconclusive. Future research should be inspired by existing literature and focus on the development of well-standardized methodologies and results published.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

干细胞治疗骨折不愈合的唯一应用:范围综述。
本研究的目的:本综述旨在强调目前单独使用干细胞治疗骨折不愈合的方式,更新之前2013年的系统综述。我们在文献中报道了单独的干细胞刺激在体内的研究,以获得当前的知识,了解干细胞在促进骨折不愈合中的关键作用。材料和方法:本综述通过系统检索PubMed、Medline和clinicaltrials.gov进行,时间范围为2012年10月至2024年9月。两位作者独立筛选了所有文章,纳入后提取了以下信息:骨不连类型、定位、干细胞类型、干细胞给药剂量、手术信息、支架类型、对照组、评估方法、干预后评估时间和不良事件。结果:在筛选的4710篇文献中,27篇符合纳入标准。在回顾的文章中,5项人类研究中有2项,12项动物研究中有8项与对照组一起报道了干细胞用于治疗骨折不愈合时对骨愈合的统计学显著影响。由于异质性,比较研究很困难。在八项人体研究中,对间充质干细胞的不良事件进行了调查。结论:根据我们的报道,文章提示单纯使用间充质干细胞治疗骨折不愈合可能是有希望的,但仍不确定。未来的研究应受到现有文献的启发,并将重点放在发展标准化的方法和发表的结果上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信