Defining a Histologic Scoring System for Gestational Alloimmune Liver Disease.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Katie R Conover, Samantha Saul, Catherine A Chapin, Estella M Alonso, Anita Gupta, Jenna L Bodmer, Mark Lovell, Hector Melin-Aldana, Sarah A Taylor
{"title":"Defining a Histologic Scoring System for Gestational Alloimmune Liver Disease.","authors":"Katie R Conover, Samantha Saul, Catherine A Chapin, Estella M Alonso, Anita Gupta, Jenna L Bodmer, Mark Lovell, Hector Melin-Aldana, Sarah A Taylor","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gestational alloimmune liver disease (GALD) is a leading cause of neonatal acute liver failure (ALF) with unique histologic features but no established histologic scoring criteria. This study aimed to develop an accurate histologic scoring system to distinguish GALD from non-GALD neonatal ALF. A preliminary system using 6 histologic features characteristic of GALD was created. Four pathologists from 2 institutions applied this system to GALD (n=11) and non-GALD (n=20) neonatal ALF cases from 2008 to 2020. Four cases of Trisomy 21-associated transient myeloproliferative disorder were analyzed separately, as these patients can present with neonatal ALF and display GALD histologic features but are clinically distinguishable. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was fitted for stepwise combinations of features to determine the most accurate scoring system. GALD histologic features included extensive parenchymal fibrosis and neotubules, and a paucity of healthy hepatocytes, portal tract involvement, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and inflammation. A revised 3-feature system including parenchymal fibrosis, neotubules, and hepatocyte characterization established highest accuracy with an AUROC of 0.891 ( P <0.001). Importantly, there were no significant interinstitutional differences in scores assigned to GALD versus non-GALD cases. A 3-factor score of <2 had 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 74%-100%) to exclude GALD and a score >5 had 95% specificity (95% CI: 76%-100%) to diagnose GALD. This study establishes a highly accurate histologic scoring system to differentiate GALD from non-GALD neonatal ALF. Findings may aid in accurate diagnosis of index cases, reducing recurrence risk in subsequent pregnancies and lowering morbidity and mortality associated with GALD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7772,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002454","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gestational alloimmune liver disease (GALD) is a leading cause of neonatal acute liver failure (ALF) with unique histologic features but no established histologic scoring criteria. This study aimed to develop an accurate histologic scoring system to distinguish GALD from non-GALD neonatal ALF. A preliminary system using 6 histologic features characteristic of GALD was created. Four pathologists from 2 institutions applied this system to GALD (n=11) and non-GALD (n=20) neonatal ALF cases from 2008 to 2020. Four cases of Trisomy 21-associated transient myeloproliferative disorder were analyzed separately, as these patients can present with neonatal ALF and display GALD histologic features but are clinically distinguishable. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was fitted for stepwise combinations of features to determine the most accurate scoring system. GALD histologic features included extensive parenchymal fibrosis and neotubules, and a paucity of healthy hepatocytes, portal tract involvement, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and inflammation. A revised 3-feature system including parenchymal fibrosis, neotubules, and hepatocyte characterization established highest accuracy with an AUROC of 0.891 ( P <0.001). Importantly, there were no significant interinstitutional differences in scores assigned to GALD versus non-GALD cases. A 3-factor score of <2 had 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 74%-100%) to exclude GALD and a score >5 had 95% specificity (95% CI: 76%-100%) to diagnose GALD. This study establishes a highly accurate histologic scoring system to differentiate GALD from non-GALD neonatal ALF. Findings may aid in accurate diagnosis of index cases, reducing recurrence risk in subsequent pregnancies and lowering morbidity and mortality associated with GALD.

定义妊娠期同种免疫肝病的组织学评分系统。
妊娠期同种免疫性肝病(GALD)是新生儿急性肝衰竭(ALF)的主要原因,具有独特的组织学特征,但没有建立的组织学评分标准。本研究旨在建立一个准确的组织学评分系统来区分GALD和非GALD新生儿ALF。利用GALD的6个组织学特征建立了一个初步的系统。来自2家机构的4名病理学家将该系统应用于2008 - 2020年GALD (n=11)和非GALD (n=20)新生儿ALF病例。我们分别分析了4例21三体相关的短暂性骨髓增生性疾病,因为这些患者可以表现为新生儿ALF和GALD的组织学特征,但临床不易区分。对受试者工作曲线下面积(AUROC)进行逐步组合拟合,以确定最准确的评分系统。GALD的组织学特征包括广泛的实质纤维化和新小管,健康肝细胞缺乏,门道受累,髓外造血和炎症。修订后的3特征系统,包括实质纤维化、小管和肝细胞特征,建立了诊断GALD的最高准确度,AUROC为0.891 (P5具有95%特异性(95% CI: 76%-100%))。本研究建立了一个高度准确的组织学评分系统来区分GALD和非GALD新生儿ALF。结果可能有助于准确诊断指标病例,减少随后妊娠的复发风险,降低与GALD相关的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgical Pathology has achieved worldwide recognition for its outstanding coverage of the state of the art in human surgical pathology. In each monthly issue, experts present original articles, review articles, detailed case reports, and special features, enhanced by superb illustrations. Coverage encompasses technical methods, diagnostic aids, and frozen-section diagnosis, in addition to detailed pathologic studies of a wide range of disease entities. Official Journal of The Arthur Purdy Stout Society of Surgical Pathologists and The Gastrointestinal Pathology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信