Epinephrine Dosing by Emergency Medicine Residents During a Simulated Prehospital Pediatric Cardiac Arrest

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Henry J. Higby, John D. Hoyle Jr., Joshua D. Mastenbrook, Philip A. Pazderka, Sarah Fichuk, Austin Wilkinson, Caleb Porter
{"title":"Epinephrine Dosing by Emergency Medicine Residents During a Simulated Prehospital Pediatric Cardiac Arrest","authors":"Henry J. Higby,&nbsp;John D. Hoyle Jr.,&nbsp;Joshua D. Mastenbrook,&nbsp;Philip A. Pazderka,&nbsp;Sarah Fichuk,&nbsp;Austin Wilkinson,&nbsp;Caleb Porter","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pediatric prehospital dosing errors occur at high rates, up to 60% for epinephrine. Senior emergency medicine residents (EMR) in the Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine (WMed) residency respond as EMS physicians to cardiac arrests in Kalamazoo County. We sought to determine error rates for weight estimation, epinephrine doses, dose administration mechanics, and esophageal intubation (EI) recognition by EMRs at the end of the PGY-1 year, during EMS physician training summative testing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sixteen PGY-1 EMRs were observed during a simulation: 5-year-old with an EMS EI in asystole requiring multiple epinephrine administrations by the EMR. All EMRs had completed Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS). Two observers scored performance. Scenarios were recorded. Recordings and scores were reviewed and discussed by observers. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus. Dosing error was defined as &gt; 20% difference from the correct dose.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All EMRs obtained correct weight with 15 (94%; 72.0%, 99.0%) using length-based tape (LBT) and one (6%) guessing. Four near-miss errors occurred with the LBT. Four (25%) and two (12.5%) of the first and second epinephrine doses, respectively, were incorrect. Five (50%) errors occurred using graduations on the preloaded syringe, and five (50%) were due to air bubbles in the administration syringe. There were no ten-fold errors. Three (19%) EMRs took 3 attempts to assemble the preloaded syringe, six (38%) did not screw the preloaded syringe together correctly, seven (44%) had difficulty attaching a stopcock to the preloaded syringe, and 14 (88%) did not prime the stopcock. One (6%) failed to recognize EI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>PALS-certified PGY-1 EMRs, accurately estimated patient weight, had a high rate of epinephrine dosing errors and frequent difficulty assembling preloaded syringes. To address these errors, training will be developed that includes a checklist, LBT use, weight determination hierarchy, assembling epinephrine preloaded syringes, techniques for appropriate dose administration, and recognition of EI.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pediatric prehospital dosing errors occur at high rates, up to 60% for epinephrine. Senior emergency medicine residents (EMR) in the Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine (WMed) residency respond as EMS physicians to cardiac arrests in Kalamazoo County. We sought to determine error rates for weight estimation, epinephrine doses, dose administration mechanics, and esophageal intubation (EI) recognition by EMRs at the end of the PGY-1 year, during EMS physician training summative testing.

Methods

Sixteen PGY-1 EMRs were observed during a simulation: 5-year-old with an EMS EI in asystole requiring multiple epinephrine administrations by the EMR. All EMRs had completed Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS). Two observers scored performance. Scenarios were recorded. Recordings and scores were reviewed and discussed by observers. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus. Dosing error was defined as > 20% difference from the correct dose.

Results

All EMRs obtained correct weight with 15 (94%; 72.0%, 99.0%) using length-based tape (LBT) and one (6%) guessing. Four near-miss errors occurred with the LBT. Four (25%) and two (12.5%) of the first and second epinephrine doses, respectively, were incorrect. Five (50%) errors occurred using graduations on the preloaded syringe, and five (50%) were due to air bubbles in the administration syringe. There were no ten-fold errors. Three (19%) EMRs took 3 attempts to assemble the preloaded syringe, six (38%) did not screw the preloaded syringe together correctly, seven (44%) had difficulty attaching a stopcock to the preloaded syringe, and 14 (88%) did not prime the stopcock. One (6%) failed to recognize EI.

Conclusions

PALS-certified PGY-1 EMRs, accurately estimated patient weight, had a high rate of epinephrine dosing errors and frequent difficulty assembling preloaded syringes. To address these errors, training will be developed that includes a checklist, LBT use, weight determination hierarchy, assembling epinephrine preloaded syringes, techniques for appropriate dose administration, and recognition of EI.

模拟院前儿童心脏骤停期间急诊医师肾上腺素的剂量
背景:儿科院前给药错误发生率很高,肾上腺素的给药错误高达60%。西密歇根大学Homer Stryker医学博士医学院(WMed)的高级急诊住院医师(EMR)作为急救医生对卡拉马祖县心脏骤停的反应。我们试图确定体重估计、肾上腺素剂量、给药机制和食管插管(EI)识别的错误率,在PGY-1年结束时,在EMS医师培训总结测试期间。方法在模拟过程中观察了16个PGY-1 EMR: 5岁的EMS EI患者在心脏骤停时需要通过EMR多次给予肾上腺素。所有EMRs均完成了儿科高级生命支持(PALS)。两名观察员为他们的表现打分。记录场景。录音和分数由观察员审查和讨论。任何分歧都以协商一致的方式解决。给药误差定义为>;与正确剂量相差20%结果所有EMRs均获得了正确的体重,15 (94%);72.0%, 99.0%)使用基于长度的磁带(LBT)和一个(6%)猜测。LBT发生了4次险些失误。第一次和第二次肾上腺素剂量分别有4次(25%)和2次(12.5%)是不正确的。5个(50%)错误发生在使用预加载注射器上的刻度,5个(50%)是由于给药注射器中的气泡造成的。没有10倍误差。3例(19%)emr需要3次尝试组装预载注射器,6例(38%)没有正确拧紧预载注射器,7例(44%)难以将旋塞连接到预载注射器上,14例(88%)没有启动旋塞。1例(6%)未能识别EI。结论pal认证的PGY-1 EMRs能够准确估计患者体重,但肾上腺素给药错误率高,预装注射器组装困难。为了解决这些错误,将开展培训,包括检查清单、LBT的使用、重量测定等级、组装肾上腺素预装注射器、适当剂量给药技术以及EI的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信