{"title":"Benchmarking Medical LLMs on Anesthesiology: A Comprehensive Dataset in Chinese","authors":"Bohao Zhou;Yibing Zhan;Zhonghai Wang;Yanhong Li;Chong Zhang;Baosheng Yu;Liang Ding;Hua Jin;Weifeng Liu;Xiongbin Wang;Dapeng Tao","doi":"10.1109/TETCI.2024.3502465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the recent success of large language models (LLMs), interest in developing them for medical domains has increased. However, due to the lack of benchmark datasets, evaluating the capabilities of medical LLMs remains challenging, particularly in highly specialized fields such as anesthesiology. To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive anesthesiology benchmark dataset in Chinese, known as the Chinese Anesthesiology Benchmark (CAB). This benchmark facilitates the evaluation of medical LLMs for anesthesiology across three crucial dimensions: knowledge, application, and safety. Specifically, the CAB provides more than 8 k questions collected from examinations and books for knowledge-level evaluation; more than 2 k questions collected from online anesthesia consultations and hospitals for application-level evaluation; and 136 tests from seven anesthesia medical care scenarios for safety-level evaluation. With the proposed CAB dataset, we conducted a thorough evaluation of six medical LLMs, such as Bianque-2 and HuatuoGPT-13B, and eleven general LLMs, such as Qwen-7B-Chat and GPT-4. The evaluation results revealed that there are still clear gaps in the capacities of medical LLMs for anesthesiology compared with those of medical students in the field of anesthesia. We hope that the proposed CAB dataset can facilitate the development of medical LLMs for anesthesiology.","PeriodicalId":13135,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence","volume":"9 4","pages":"3057-3071"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10840322/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the recent success of large language models (LLMs), interest in developing them for medical domains has increased. However, due to the lack of benchmark datasets, evaluating the capabilities of medical LLMs remains challenging, particularly in highly specialized fields such as anesthesiology. To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive anesthesiology benchmark dataset in Chinese, known as the Chinese Anesthesiology Benchmark (CAB). This benchmark facilitates the evaluation of medical LLMs for anesthesiology across three crucial dimensions: knowledge, application, and safety. Specifically, the CAB provides more than 8 k questions collected from examinations and books for knowledge-level evaluation; more than 2 k questions collected from online anesthesia consultations and hospitals for application-level evaluation; and 136 tests from seven anesthesia medical care scenarios for safety-level evaluation. With the proposed CAB dataset, we conducted a thorough evaluation of six medical LLMs, such as Bianque-2 and HuatuoGPT-13B, and eleven general LLMs, such as Qwen-7B-Chat and GPT-4. The evaluation results revealed that there are still clear gaps in the capacities of medical LLMs for anesthesiology compared with those of medical students in the field of anesthesia. We hope that the proposed CAB dataset can facilitate the development of medical LLMs for anesthesiology.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence (TETCI) publishes original articles on emerging aspects of computational intelligence, including theory, applications, and surveys.
TETCI is an electronics only publication. TETCI publishes six issues per year.
Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts in any emerging topic in computational intelligence, especially nature-inspired computing topics not covered by other IEEE Computational Intelligence Society journals. A few such illustrative examples are glial cell networks, computational neuroscience, Brain Computer Interface, ambient intelligence, non-fuzzy computing with words, artificial life, cultural learning, artificial endocrine networks, social reasoning, artificial hormone networks, computational intelligence for the IoT and Smart-X technologies.