A temporal comparison of nearshore fish communities in Hamilton Harbour and the Bay of Quinte areas of concern (1988–2021)

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Nicole A. Turner, Melanie V. Croft-White, Christine M. Boston, Jonathan D. Midwood
{"title":"A temporal comparison of nearshore fish communities in Hamilton Harbour and the Bay of Quinte areas of concern (1988–2021)","authors":"Nicole A. Turner,&nbsp;Melanie V. Croft-White,&nbsp;Christine M. Boston,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Midwood","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2025.102609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lake Ontario and, in particular, areas across the western basin have been subjected to intense anthropogenic stressors. In response, Areas of Concern (AOC) were designated to aid in rehabilitation efforts to reduce nutrient loading and improve aquatic habitat. Here we use fish community metrics (e.g., Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI)) as well as species occurrence and catch modelling to compare trends in fish population condition over 30 years between Hamilton Harbour (HH) and the Bay of Quinte (BoQ). We found clear spatial differences within HH and limited evidence for improvement in nearshore fish populations. The few exceptions were declines in non-native species catch and richness and total offshore species catch, driven primarily by declines in common carp (<em>Cyprinus carpio</em>) and alewife (<em>Alosa pseudoharengus</em>). Similar declines in non-native species richness were evident in the BoQ, but IBI and fish population metrics, including proportion of piscivore biomass and native species catch and richness, were always greater in BoQ. In contrast, several metrics and species in HH showed recent declines (following 2012) that rolled back improvements observed in the early 2000 s. Such HH-specific changes suggest that local (e.g., ongoing anthropogenic disturbance, novel invasive species, and minimal changes in habitat supply) rather than regional factors are limiting recovery of the fish community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 102609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133025001030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lake Ontario and, in particular, areas across the western basin have been subjected to intense anthropogenic stressors. In response, Areas of Concern (AOC) were designated to aid in rehabilitation efforts to reduce nutrient loading and improve aquatic habitat. Here we use fish community metrics (e.g., Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI)) as well as species occurrence and catch modelling to compare trends in fish population condition over 30 years between Hamilton Harbour (HH) and the Bay of Quinte (BoQ). We found clear spatial differences within HH and limited evidence for improvement in nearshore fish populations. The few exceptions were declines in non-native species catch and richness and total offshore species catch, driven primarily by declines in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus). Similar declines in non-native species richness were evident in the BoQ, but IBI and fish population metrics, including proportion of piscivore biomass and native species catch and richness, were always greater in BoQ. In contrast, several metrics and species in HH showed recent declines (following 2012) that rolled back improvements observed in the early 2000 s. Such HH-specific changes suggest that local (e.g., ongoing anthropogenic disturbance, novel invasive species, and minimal changes in habitat supply) rather than regional factors are limiting recovery of the fish community.
1988-2021年汉密尔顿港和昆特湾近岸鱼类群落的时间比较
安大略湖,特别是整个西部盆地地区受到强烈的人为压力。作为回应,指定了关注区域(AOC)来协助恢复工作,以减少营养负荷和改善水生生境。在这里,我们使用鱼类群落指标(例如,生物完整性指数(IBI))以及物种发生和捕捞模型来比较汉密尔顿港(HH)和昆特湾(BoQ)之间30年来鱼类种群状况的趋势。我们发现了明显的HH空间差异和有限的证据表明近岸鱼类种群的改善。少数例外是非本土物种捕获量和丰富度以及近海物种总捕获量的下降,这主要是由鲤鱼(Cyprinus carpio)和灰鲱(Alosa pseudoharengus)的下降造成的。非本地物种丰富度在BoQ也有明显的下降,但IBI和鱼类种群指标(包括鱼类生物量比例、本地物种捕捞量和丰富度)在BoQ都更大。相比之下,HH的几个指标和物种最近出现了下降(2012年之后),逆转了21世纪初观察到的改善。这种特定于hh的变化表明,限制鱼类群落恢复的是当地因素(例如,持续的人为干扰、新入侵物种和栖息地供应的微小变化),而不是区域因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Great Lakes Research
Journal of Great Lakes Research 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Published six times per year, the Journal of Great Lakes Research is multidisciplinary in its coverage, publishing manuscripts on a wide range of theoretical and applied topics in the natural science fields of biology, chemistry, physics, geology, as well as social sciences of the large lakes of the world and their watersheds. Large lakes generally are considered as those lakes which have a mean surface area of >500 km2 (see Herdendorf, C.E. 1982. Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Res. 8:379-412, for examples), although smaller lakes may be considered, especially if they are very deep. We also welcome contributions on saline lakes and research on estuarine waters where the results have application to large lakes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信