Turbidity associated with the beneficial placement of dredged sediment in the dynamic littoral zone at Fairport Harbor, Ohio

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Douglas R. Krafft , Jonathan M. Waddell , Karen G. Keil , Brett A. Hayhurst , Brian C. McFall , James P. Selegean
{"title":"Turbidity associated with the beneficial placement of dredged sediment in the dynamic littoral zone at Fairport Harbor, Ohio","authors":"Douglas R. Krafft ,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Waddell ,&nbsp;Karen G. Keil ,&nbsp;Brett A. Hayhurst ,&nbsp;Brian C. McFall ,&nbsp;James P. Selegean","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2025.102533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The nearshore placement of sediments dredged via maintenance of navigation channels is a cost-effective management solution which offers myriad benefits that can include shoreline protection and habitat restoration. Benefits can be offset by concerns due to potential effects on the ecosystem from turbidity generated during placement. This study investigates the turbidity and geomorphic response of dredged sediment placed within the dynamic littoral zone of Lake Erie. Turbidity was measured at nine locations before, during, and after nearshore dredged material placement, and bathymetry was measured in four surveys to capture the effects of placing 39,400 m<sup>3</sup> of material from Fairport Harbor, Ohio. Nearshore turbidity measurements collected before dredging occurred could be explained using wave data, which provided an estimate for expected background turbidity during and after dredging. These wave models continued to fit measured turbidity data well during and after dredged material placement and indicate sediment placement did not significantly increase turbidity at any of the monitoring locations. Bathymetry surveys indicate sediment was placed within the active littoral zone and may have contributed to accretion along the onshore edge of the pre-existing bar. These observations indicate that nearshore placement of dredged material in this environment is aligned with natural sediment movement in the littoral zone, with minimal to negligible generation of turbidity beyond what occurs naturally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 102533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133025000279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nearshore placement of sediments dredged via maintenance of navigation channels is a cost-effective management solution which offers myriad benefits that can include shoreline protection and habitat restoration. Benefits can be offset by concerns due to potential effects on the ecosystem from turbidity generated during placement. This study investigates the turbidity and geomorphic response of dredged sediment placed within the dynamic littoral zone of Lake Erie. Turbidity was measured at nine locations before, during, and after nearshore dredged material placement, and bathymetry was measured in four surveys to capture the effects of placing 39,400 m3 of material from Fairport Harbor, Ohio. Nearshore turbidity measurements collected before dredging occurred could be explained using wave data, which provided an estimate for expected background turbidity during and after dredging. These wave models continued to fit measured turbidity data well during and after dredged material placement and indicate sediment placement did not significantly increase turbidity at any of the monitoring locations. Bathymetry surveys indicate sediment was placed within the active littoral zone and may have contributed to accretion along the onshore edge of the pre-existing bar. These observations indicate that nearshore placement of dredged material in this environment is aligned with natural sediment movement in the littoral zone, with minimal to negligible generation of turbidity beyond what occurs naturally.
浊度与疏浚泥沙在俄亥俄州费尔波特港动态沿岸带的有利位置有关
通过维护航道疏浚沉积物的近岸安置是一种经济有效的管理解决方案,可以提供无数的好处,包括海岸线保护和栖息地恢复。由于在放置过程中产生的浑浊对生态系统的潜在影响,可能会抵消这些好处。本文研究了伊利湖动态沿岸带内疏浚泥沙的浊度和地貌响应。在近岸疏浚材料放置之前、期间和之后的九个地点测量了浊度,并在四次调查中测量了水深测量,以捕捉从俄亥俄州费尔波特港放置39,400立方米材料的影响。在疏浚发生之前收集的近岸浑浊度测量可以用波浪数据来解释,波浪数据提供了疏浚期间和之后预期背景浑浊度的估计。在疏浚材料放置期间和之后,这些波浪模型继续很好地拟合测量的浊度数据,并表明沉积物放置在任何监测地点都没有显着增加浊度。水深测量表明,沉积物被放置在活跃的沿海带内,可能导致了先前存在的沙洲沿海岸边缘的增生。这些观察结果表明,在这种环境中,近岸疏浚材料的放置与沿海地区的自然沉积物运动一致,除了自然发生的浑浊之外,产生的浑浊程度很小,甚至可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Great Lakes Research
Journal of Great Lakes Research 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Published six times per year, the Journal of Great Lakes Research is multidisciplinary in its coverage, publishing manuscripts on a wide range of theoretical and applied topics in the natural science fields of biology, chemistry, physics, geology, as well as social sciences of the large lakes of the world and their watersheds. Large lakes generally are considered as those lakes which have a mean surface area of >500 km2 (see Herdendorf, C.E. 1982. Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Res. 8:379-412, for examples), although smaller lakes may be considered, especially if they are very deep. We also welcome contributions on saline lakes and research on estuarine waters where the results have application to large lakes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信