Still fit to drive? Effect of car sickness on takeover and driving performance – A test-track study

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Myriam Metzulat , Barbara Metz , Andreas Landau , Aaron Edelmann , Alexandra Neukum , Wilfried Kunde
{"title":"Still fit to drive? Effect of car sickness on takeover and driving performance – A test-track study","authors":"Myriam Metzulat ,&nbsp;Barbara Metz ,&nbsp;Andreas Landau ,&nbsp;Aaron Edelmann ,&nbsp;Alexandra Neukum ,&nbsp;Wilfried Kunde","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.07.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In automated driving, car sickness may occur as a new driver state as drivers become passengers during automation. Given previous findings of cognitive impairments due to motion sickness, which could lead to safety critical behavior in takeover situations, the aim of this study was to understand if and how car sickness affects takeover and subsequent driving performance. In a wizard-of-Oz test-track study, <em>N</em> = 33 participants experienced a car sickness and a baseline condition without car sickness. Car sickness was induced by a dynamically simulated automated drive during which participants engaged in an NDRT. In both conditions, four takeover requests were triggered followed by four driving tasks: emergency braking, target braking, free speed slalom and a 25 km/h slalom. Driving with car sickness subjectively impaired the driving performance and was perceived as significantly more critical and demanding. Subjective fitness to drive decreased significantly with increasing car sickness (<em>r</em> = 0.601, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). However, objective performance measures did not reflect these subjective impairments, showing no significant adverse effects on takeover times, emergency braking reaction times, distance to target position or slalom performance. Nevertheless, participants drove significantly faster with car sickness, contrary to participants’ report of reducing speed. To conclude, based on the objective data car sickness is unlikely to be a critical driver state, however subjectively it may be. Driving with car sickness appears to be more of a comfort issue than a safety issue. These results should be replicated with more realistic driving scenarios and with longer sustained driving performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 1223-1240"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782500261X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In automated driving, car sickness may occur as a new driver state as drivers become passengers during automation. Given previous findings of cognitive impairments due to motion sickness, which could lead to safety critical behavior in takeover situations, the aim of this study was to understand if and how car sickness affects takeover and subsequent driving performance. In a wizard-of-Oz test-track study, N = 33 participants experienced a car sickness and a baseline condition without car sickness. Car sickness was induced by a dynamically simulated automated drive during which participants engaged in an NDRT. In both conditions, four takeover requests were triggered followed by four driving tasks: emergency braking, target braking, free speed slalom and a 25 km/h slalom. Driving with car sickness subjectively impaired the driving performance and was perceived as significantly more critical and demanding. Subjective fitness to drive decreased significantly with increasing car sickness (r = 0.601, p < 0.001). However, objective performance measures did not reflect these subjective impairments, showing no significant adverse effects on takeover times, emergency braking reaction times, distance to target position or slalom performance. Nevertheless, participants drove significantly faster with car sickness, contrary to participants’ report of reducing speed. To conclude, based on the objective data car sickness is unlikely to be a critical driver state, however subjectively it may be. Driving with car sickness appears to be more of a comfort issue than a safety issue. These results should be replicated with more realistic driving scenarios and with longer sustained driving performance.
还能开车吗?晕车对接管和驾驶性能的影响-一项测试研究
在自动驾驶中,当驾驶员在自动驾驶过程中成为乘客时,晕车可能会作为一种新的驾驶员状态出现。鉴于之前的研究结果,晕动病会导致认知障碍,这可能导致在接管情况下的安全关键行为,本研究的目的是了解晕车是否以及如何影响接管和随后的驾驶表现。在一项绿野仙踪测试研究中,N = 33名参与者经历了晕车和没有晕车的基线情况。晕车是由动态模拟的自动驾驶引起的,在这个过程中,参与者进行了NDRT。在这两种情况下,触发了四个接管请求,然后是四个驾驶任务:紧急制动、目标制动、自由速度障碍和25公里/小时的障碍。晕车时驾驶会主观上影响驾驶表现,并且被认为更加挑剔和苛刻。主观驾驶适应性随晕车增加而显著降低(r = 0.601, p <;0.001)。然而,客观性能测量并没有反映这些主观损伤,在接管时间、紧急制动反应时间、到目标位置的距离或障碍表现方面没有明显的不利影响。然而,与参与者报告的减速相反,晕车的参与者开得更快了。综上所述,根据客观数据,晕车不太可能是一种关键的驾驶状态,但主观上它可能是。晕车驾驶似乎更像是一个舒适问题,而不是安全问题。这些结果应该在更现实的驾驶场景和更持久的驾驶性能中得到复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信