Attitudes toward environmental regulation vary by race/ethnicity among US Republicans

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jacob B. Rode , Sanchi Kohli , Alina Kushner , Joshua D. Greene
{"title":"Attitudes toward environmental regulation vary by race/ethnicity among US Republicans","authors":"Jacob B. Rode ,&nbsp;Sanchi Kohli ,&nbsp;Alina Kushner ,&nbsp;Joshua D. Greene","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>U.S. Republicans have low support for environmental regulations, but recent studies suggest this support varies by race and ethnicity. Here, we extend this work by further examining racial/ethnic differences within Republicans in two datasets. The first was a primary study and probability sample of U.S. Republicans (<em>N</em> = 2395). The second was a secondary data analysis of the Cooperative Election Study (2014–2022; <em>N</em> = 123,133 Republicans). We tested the association between race/ethnicity and attitudes towards various environmental regulations, adjusting for relevant covariates. Across both datasets, we found that White Republicans consistently had the lowest support for environmental regulations compared to Asian, Black, and Hispanic Republicans. In the CES dataset, Asian Republicans tended to have the strongest support followed by Black, Hispanic, and White Republicans, respectively. This order remained across most outcomes though the pattern of significance varied. For example, Asian Republicans' regulation support was consistently significantly higher than Hispanic and White Republicans' but only sometimes significantly higher than Black Republicans’ support. The findings highlight the important variation in environmental policy attitudes that exists within Republicans, specifically across racial/ethnic groups and type of regulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102692"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001756","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

U.S. Republicans have low support for environmental regulations, but recent studies suggest this support varies by race and ethnicity. Here, we extend this work by further examining racial/ethnic differences within Republicans in two datasets. The first was a primary study and probability sample of U.S. Republicans (N = 2395). The second was a secondary data analysis of the Cooperative Election Study (2014–2022; N = 123,133 Republicans). We tested the association between race/ethnicity and attitudes towards various environmental regulations, adjusting for relevant covariates. Across both datasets, we found that White Republicans consistently had the lowest support for environmental regulations compared to Asian, Black, and Hispanic Republicans. In the CES dataset, Asian Republicans tended to have the strongest support followed by Black, Hispanic, and White Republicans, respectively. This order remained across most outcomes though the pattern of significance varied. For example, Asian Republicans' regulation support was consistently significantly higher than Hispanic and White Republicans' but only sometimes significantly higher than Black Republicans’ support. The findings highlight the important variation in environmental policy attitudes that exists within Republicans, specifically across racial/ethnic groups and type of regulation.
美国共和党人对环境法规的态度因种族而异
美国共和党人对环境法规的支持率很低,但最近的研究表明,这种支持率因种族和民族而异。在这里,我们通过在两个数据集中进一步研究共和党内部的种族/民族差异来扩展这项工作。第一个是对美国共和党人的初步研究和概率样本(N = 2395)。二是合作选举研究(2014-2022;N = 123,133共和党人)。我们测试了种族/民族与对各种环境法规的态度之间的联系,并对相关协变量进行了调整。在这两个数据集中,我们发现,与亚裔、黑人和西班牙裔共和党人相比,白人共和党人对环境法规的支持率一直最低。在CES的数据集中,亚裔共和党人的支持率最高,其次是黑人、西班牙裔和白人共和党人。这个顺序在大多数结果中保持不变,尽管重要性的模式有所不同。例如,亚裔共和党人对监管的支持始终显著高于西班牙裔和白人共和党人,但只是有时显著高于黑人共和党人。研究结果强调了共和党内部环境政策态度的重要差异,特别是在种族/民族群体和监管类型之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信