Jacob B. Rode , Sanchi Kohli , Alina Kushner , Joshua D. Greene
{"title":"Attitudes toward environmental regulation vary by race/ethnicity among US Republicans","authors":"Jacob B. Rode , Sanchi Kohli , Alina Kushner , Joshua D. Greene","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>U.S. Republicans have low support for environmental regulations, but recent studies suggest this support varies by race and ethnicity. Here, we extend this work by further examining racial/ethnic differences within Republicans in two datasets. The first was a primary study and probability sample of U.S. Republicans (<em>N</em> = 2395). The second was a secondary data analysis of the Cooperative Election Study (2014–2022; <em>N</em> = 123,133 Republicans). We tested the association between race/ethnicity and attitudes towards various environmental regulations, adjusting for relevant covariates. Across both datasets, we found that White Republicans consistently had the lowest support for environmental regulations compared to Asian, Black, and Hispanic Republicans. In the CES dataset, Asian Republicans tended to have the strongest support followed by Black, Hispanic, and White Republicans, respectively. This order remained across most outcomes though the pattern of significance varied. For example, Asian Republicans' regulation support was consistently significantly higher than Hispanic and White Republicans' but only sometimes significantly higher than Black Republicans’ support. The findings highlight the important variation in environmental policy attitudes that exists within Republicans, specifically across racial/ethnic groups and type of regulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102692"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001756","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
U.S. Republicans have low support for environmental regulations, but recent studies suggest this support varies by race and ethnicity. Here, we extend this work by further examining racial/ethnic differences within Republicans in two datasets. The first was a primary study and probability sample of U.S. Republicans (N = 2395). The second was a secondary data analysis of the Cooperative Election Study (2014–2022; N = 123,133 Republicans). We tested the association between race/ethnicity and attitudes towards various environmental regulations, adjusting for relevant covariates. Across both datasets, we found that White Republicans consistently had the lowest support for environmental regulations compared to Asian, Black, and Hispanic Republicans. In the CES dataset, Asian Republicans tended to have the strongest support followed by Black, Hispanic, and White Republicans, respectively. This order remained across most outcomes though the pattern of significance varied. For example, Asian Republicans' regulation support was consistently significantly higher than Hispanic and White Republicans' but only sometimes significantly higher than Black Republicans’ support. The findings highlight the important variation in environmental policy attitudes that exists within Republicans, specifically across racial/ethnic groups and type of regulation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space