Governing feral cats through platform: The StreetCat project, digital environmental governance, and multispecies urbanism

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Lijia Guo, Yi Yu
{"title":"Governing feral cats through platform: The StreetCat project, digital environmental governance, and multispecies urbanism","authors":"Lijia Guo,&nbsp;Yi Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban feral cats in China have recently emerged as a focal point for complex governance challenges and societal debates. In response, digital technology interventions, exemplified by the StreetCat project, have emerged. Existing scholarship on feral cats, however, inadequately addresses the operational logic of such digital interventions. Employing online/offline ethnography and multi-source web data analysis, this study investigates how digital technology reshapes spatial practices in urban feral cat governance and reconfigures human-place-nonhuman relationships. The research reveals that technology deployment centred on Smart Cat Houses, AI recognition, and data platforms establishes a novel digital governance, transforming feral cats into data subjects amenable to monitoring, quantification, and remote intervention. Such intervention, in turn, enacts a profoundly ambivalent politics of care. While it fosters new forms of digital intimacy and cross-regional care networks, it simultaneously introduces cognitive biases and risks of commodification. Spatially, this politics of care manifests in the deployment of Smart Cat Houses as contested sites of public space, while the meaning of ’beastly places’ is revealed to be co-produced through the entanglement of technological failure, human conflict, and crucial, non-human agency. Integrating animal geography and <em>trans</em>-species urban theory, this paper advances digital governance scholarship by revealing how its application to feral cats in urban China creates a contested entanglement of datafication, material dependency, and politics of care, which co-produces ’beastly places’ while highlighting non-human agency and urban socio-ecological complexities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104365"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban feral cats in China have recently emerged as a focal point for complex governance challenges and societal debates. In response, digital technology interventions, exemplified by the StreetCat project, have emerged. Existing scholarship on feral cats, however, inadequately addresses the operational logic of such digital interventions. Employing online/offline ethnography and multi-source web data analysis, this study investigates how digital technology reshapes spatial practices in urban feral cat governance and reconfigures human-place-nonhuman relationships. The research reveals that technology deployment centred on Smart Cat Houses, AI recognition, and data platforms establishes a novel digital governance, transforming feral cats into data subjects amenable to monitoring, quantification, and remote intervention. Such intervention, in turn, enacts a profoundly ambivalent politics of care. While it fosters new forms of digital intimacy and cross-regional care networks, it simultaneously introduces cognitive biases and risks of commodification. Spatially, this politics of care manifests in the deployment of Smart Cat Houses as contested sites of public space, while the meaning of ’beastly places’ is revealed to be co-produced through the entanglement of technological failure, human conflict, and crucial, non-human agency. Integrating animal geography and trans-species urban theory, this paper advances digital governance scholarship by revealing how its application to feral cats in urban China creates a contested entanglement of datafication, material dependency, and politics of care, which co-produces ’beastly places’ while highlighting non-human agency and urban socio-ecological complexities.
通过平台治理野猫:StreetCat项目、数字环境治理和多物种城市化
中国的城市野猫最近成为复杂的治理挑战和社会辩论的焦点。作为回应,以StreetCat项目为代表的数字技术干预已经出现。然而,现有的关于野猫的学术研究不足以解决这种数字干预的操作逻辑。利用线上/线下人种学和多源网络数据分析,本研究探讨了数字技术如何重塑城市野猫治理的空间实践,并重新配置人-地-非人关系。研究表明,以智能猫屋、人工智能识别和数据平台为中心的技术部署建立了一种新的数字治理,将野猫转变为可监控、量化和远程干预的数据主体。这样的干预反过来又造成了一种极其矛盾的关怀政治。它在促进新形式的数字亲密关系和跨区域护理网络的同时,也带来了认知偏见和商品化风险。在空间上,这种关心的政治体现在智能猫屋作为公共空间的争议场所的部署上,而“野兽之地”的含义则是通过技术失败、人类冲突和关键的非人类机构的纠缠而共同产生的。结合动物地理学和跨物种城市理论,本文通过揭示将数字治理应用于中国城市中的野猫如何在数据化、物质依赖和关怀政治之间产生有争议的纠缠,从而推进了数字治理研究,这些纠缠共同产生了“野兽之地”,同时突出了非人类机构和城市社会生态复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信