Synthetic data trained open-source language models are feasible alternatives to proprietary models for radiology reporting

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aakriti Pandita, Angela Keniston, Nikhil Madhuripan
{"title":"Synthetic data trained open-source language models are feasible alternatives to proprietary models for radiology reporting","authors":"Aakriti Pandita, Angela Keniston, Nikhil Madhuripan","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01658-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study assessed the feasibility of using synthetic data to fine-tune various open-source LLMs for free text to structured data conversation in radiology, comparing their performance with GPT models. A training set of 3000 synthetic thyroid nodule dictations was generated to train six open-source models (Starcoderbase-1B, Starcoderbase-3B, Mistral-7B, Llama-3-8B, Llama-2-13B, and Yi-34B). ACR TI-RADS template was the target model output. The model performance was tested on 50 thyroid nodule dictations from MIMIC-III patient dataset and compared against 0-shot, 1-shot, and 5-shot performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. GPT-4 5-shot and Yi-34B showed the highest performance with no statistically significant difference between the models. Various open models outperformed GPT models with statistical significance. Overall, models trained with synthetic data showed performance comparable to GPT models in structured text conversion in our study. Given privacy preserving advantages, open LLMs can be utilized as a viable alternative to proprietary GPT models.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01658-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study assessed the feasibility of using synthetic data to fine-tune various open-source LLMs for free text to structured data conversation in radiology, comparing their performance with GPT models. A training set of 3000 synthetic thyroid nodule dictations was generated to train six open-source models (Starcoderbase-1B, Starcoderbase-3B, Mistral-7B, Llama-3-8B, Llama-2-13B, and Yi-34B). ACR TI-RADS template was the target model output. The model performance was tested on 50 thyroid nodule dictations from MIMIC-III patient dataset and compared against 0-shot, 1-shot, and 5-shot performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. GPT-4 5-shot and Yi-34B showed the highest performance with no statistically significant difference between the models. Various open models outperformed GPT models with statistical significance. Overall, models trained with synthetic data showed performance comparable to GPT models in structured text conversion in our study. Given privacy preserving advantages, open LLMs can be utilized as a viable alternative to proprietary GPT models.

Abstract Image

合成数据训练的开源语言模型是放射学报告专有模型的可行替代方案
该研究评估了使用合成数据对各种开源法学硕士进行微调的可行性,以便在放射学中进行自由文本到结构化数据对话,并将其性能与GPT模型进行比较。生成3000个合成甲状腺结节听写的训练集,用于训练6个开源模型(Starcoderbase-1B、Starcoderbase-3B、Mistral-7B、Llama-3-8B、Llama-2-13B和Yi-34B)。ACR TI-RADS模板为目标模型输出。在来自MIMIC-III患者数据集的50个甲状腺结节指令上测试了模型的性能,并与GPT-3.5和GPT-4的0次、1次和5次性能进行了比较。GPT-4 5-shot和Yi-34B表现最好,模型间无统计学差异。各开放模型优于GPT模型,差异有统计学意义。总的来说,在我们的研究中,用合成数据训练的模型在结构化文本转换方面表现出与GPT模型相当的性能。考虑到隐私保护的优势,开放llm可以作为专有GPT模型的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信