The Effect of Oral Immunotherapy on Preterm Neonates: A Promising Adjuvant Therapy in a Clinical Trial Study.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1159/000547414
Hoda Atef Abdelsattar Ibrahim, Khaled Elkhashab, Iman Khaled Ayada, Hams Magdy, Shymaa Sobhy Menshawy
{"title":"The Effect of Oral Immunotherapy on Preterm Neonates: A Promising Adjuvant Therapy in a Clinical Trial Study.","authors":"Hoda Atef Abdelsattar Ibrahim, Khaled Elkhashab, Iman Khaled Ayada, Hams Magdy, Shymaa Sobhy Menshawy","doi":"10.1159/000547414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breastfeeding is currently recommended as the optimal and initial feeding option for all newborns, as it protects against illness and reduces neonatal mortality. Furthermore, premature infants exhibit reduced swallowing ability and an increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), which may hinder suckling and delay the initiation of enteral feeding.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effects of oropharyngeal colostrum delivery in preterm neonates < 34 weeks' gestation on hospital outcomes, specifically differences in hospital stay between neonates who received colostrum for three days and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial enrolled ninety-six preterm neonates, who were allocated into three groups: Group A, neonates who received oropharyngeal colostrum for 3 days along with routine care; Group B, neonates who received oropharyngeal colostrum for 10 days along with routine care; and Group C, neonates who received routine care only. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare medians among the three groups. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-squared test and Monte Carlo test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups that received colostrum showed significantly reduced median hospital stays, time to reach full enteral intake, and sepsis rates compared to the control group (P < 0.001). A significant difference in daily weight gain was observed between groups, particularly between the control group and neonates who received colostrum for 10 days (P = 0.028). Regarding the incidence of NEC, no significant difference was found among the groups (P = 0.314).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oropharyngeal colostrum may be considered a potential oral immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breastfeeding is currently recommended as the optimal and initial feeding option for all newborns, as it protects against illness and reduces neonatal mortality. Furthermore, premature infants exhibit reduced swallowing ability and an increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), which may hinder suckling and delay the initiation of enteral feeding.

Aim: To investigate the effects of oropharyngeal colostrum delivery in preterm neonates < 34 weeks' gestation on hospital outcomes, specifically differences in hospital stay between neonates who received colostrum for three days and those who did not.

Methods: This prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial enrolled ninety-six preterm neonates, who were allocated into three groups: Group A, neonates who received oropharyngeal colostrum for 3 days along with routine care; Group B, neonates who received oropharyngeal colostrum for 10 days along with routine care; and Group C, neonates who received routine care only. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare medians among the three groups. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-squared test and Monte Carlo test.

Results: The two groups that received colostrum showed significantly reduced median hospital stays, time to reach full enteral intake, and sepsis rates compared to the control group (P < 0.001). A significant difference in daily weight gain was observed between groups, particularly between the control group and neonates who received colostrum for 10 days (P = 0.028). Regarding the incidence of NEC, no significant difference was found among the groups (P = 0.314).

Conclusion: Oropharyngeal colostrum may be considered a potential oral immunotherapy.

口服免疫治疗对早产儿的影响:一项有前景的辅助治疗临床试验研究。
背景:母乳喂养目前被推荐为所有新生儿的最佳初始喂养选择,因为它可以预防疾病并降低新生儿死亡率。此外,早产儿表现出吞咽能力下降和发生坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)的风险增加,这可能会阻碍哺乳并延迟肠内喂养的开始。目的:探讨妊娠< 34周的早产新生儿口咽初乳对医院预后的影响,特别是接受初乳3天和未接受初乳3天的新生儿住院时间的差异。方法:本前瞻性、干预性、随机对照试验纳入96例早产儿,分为三组:A组,接受口咽初乳3天及常规护理的新生儿;B组:给予口咽初乳10天并给予常规护理的新生儿;C组仅接受常规护理的新生儿。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较三组间的中位数。分类变量间的相关性采用卡方检验和蒙特卡罗检验进行分析。结果:与对照组相比,接受初乳治疗的两组患者的平均住院时间、达到完全肠内摄入的时间和脓毒症发生率均显著降低(P < 0.001)。各组之间的日增重有显著差异,特别是对照组和服用初乳10天的新生儿之间(P = 0.028)。NEC发病率组间比较差异无统计学意义(P = 0.314)。结论:口咽初乳可能被认为是一种潜在的口服免疫疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信