The rise of commodity care.

IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-07-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1611746
Jacy E Neczypor
{"title":"The rise of commodity care.","authors":"Jacy E Neczypor","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1611746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The commoditization of health care under the guise of advanced preventive services and data-driven performance optimization poses risks for patient care and lessons for health systems. This editorial defines and examines \"commodity care,\" a growing model of direct-to-consumer healthcare characterized by self-referral for advanced diagnostic imaging and/or serologic testing. Promoted as empowering and proactive preventive care, commodity care services frequently operate beyond established clinical guidelines and lack robust evidence to support their clinical utility. Despite appealing marketing claims, these services carry significant risks for patients, including overdiagnosis, false-positive results, and incidental findings that lead to unnecessary interventions that may cause physical, psychological, and financial harms. At the health system level, commodity care contributes to fragmented patient experiences, promotes low-value utilization of healthcare resources, and raises ethical and environmental concerns related to data stewardship and sustainability. Yet, the rising demand for these services also suggests a deeper dissatisfaction among patients with traditional care models, particularly around issues of access, responsiveness, and personalization. Whether driven primarily by shortcomings of conventional healthcare delivery or by shifting patient expectations, the expansion of commodity care warrants careful attention from clinicians, policymakers, and regulators. Defining commodity care is an imperative first step in understanding its implications. This editorial advocates for increased regulatory oversight and rigorous evaluation of emerging healthcare models that increasingly blur distinctions between clinical medicine and consumer-oriented services. Ultimately, the advancement of healthcare technology should support-not erode-the quality, value, and patient-centeredness of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1611746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1611746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The commoditization of health care under the guise of advanced preventive services and data-driven performance optimization poses risks for patient care and lessons for health systems. This editorial defines and examines "commodity care," a growing model of direct-to-consumer healthcare characterized by self-referral for advanced diagnostic imaging and/or serologic testing. Promoted as empowering and proactive preventive care, commodity care services frequently operate beyond established clinical guidelines and lack robust evidence to support their clinical utility. Despite appealing marketing claims, these services carry significant risks for patients, including overdiagnosis, false-positive results, and incidental findings that lead to unnecessary interventions that may cause physical, psychological, and financial harms. At the health system level, commodity care contributes to fragmented patient experiences, promotes low-value utilization of healthcare resources, and raises ethical and environmental concerns related to data stewardship and sustainability. Yet, the rising demand for these services also suggests a deeper dissatisfaction among patients with traditional care models, particularly around issues of access, responsiveness, and personalization. Whether driven primarily by shortcomings of conventional healthcare delivery or by shifting patient expectations, the expansion of commodity care warrants careful attention from clinicians, policymakers, and regulators. Defining commodity care is an imperative first step in understanding its implications. This editorial advocates for increased regulatory oversight and rigorous evaluation of emerging healthcare models that increasingly blur distinctions between clinical medicine and consumer-oriented services. Ultimately, the advancement of healthcare technology should support-not erode-the quality, value, and patient-centeredness of care.

日用品护理的兴起。
在先进预防服务和数据驱动的绩效优化的幌子下,卫生保健的商品化给患者护理带来了风险,也给卫生系统带来了教训。这篇社论定义并研究了“商品护理”,这是一种不断发展的直接面向消费者的医疗保健模式,其特点是自我转诊进行高级诊断成像和/或血清学检测。商品护理服务被宣传为增强权能和积极主动的预防保健,但其运作往往超出了既定的临床指南,缺乏有力的证据来支持其临床效用。尽管市场宣传很有吸引力,但这些服务给患者带来了重大风险,包括过度诊断、假阳性结果和导致不必要干预的偶然发现,这些干预可能造成身体、心理和经济上的伤害。在卫生系统层面,商品护理导致患者体验碎片化,促进医疗资源的低价值利用,并引发与数据管理和可持续性相关的伦理和环境问题。然而,对这些服务不断增长的需求也表明,患者对传统护理模式的更深层次的不满,特别是在获取、响应和个性化方面。无论主要是由于传统医疗保健服务的缺陷还是由于患者期望的转变,商品护理的扩张都值得临床医生、政策制定者和监管机构的仔细关注。定义商品护理是理解其含义的必要的第一步。这篇社论提倡加强对新兴医疗保健模式的监管和严格评估,这些模式日益模糊了临床医学和面向消费者的服务之间的区别。最终,医疗技术的进步应该支持——而不是削弱——医疗的质量、价值和以患者为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信