Effects of Combining Robotic Assisted Therapy for Upper Limb With Other Therapeutic Approaches After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.
{"title":"Effects of Combining Robotic Assisted Therapy for Upper Limb With Other Therapeutic Approaches After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.","authors":"Naoya Anmoto, Shiori Watanabe, Takao Kaneko, Masanori Maeda, Yuho Okita, Takashi Takebayashi","doi":"10.1002/pri.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Robotic-assisted therapy for the upper limb (RAT-UL) is a well-established, evidence-based approach to stroke rehabilitation. However, the effectiveness of combining RAT-UL with other therapeutic approaches remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023422583), aimed to investigate the effect of combination therapy added to RAT-UL compared with RAT-UL alone on improving the motor function, and capacity of the affected upper limb and activity of daily living.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English before October 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. The primary inclusion criteria encompassed adults after stroke who underwent combining RAT-UL with other therapeutic approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After reviewing 5669 studies, we included 16 RCTs in this study. The overall effect of combining RAT-UL with other therapeutic approaches on the motor function in Fugl-Meyer Assessment was not significant improvement (MD = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.00-2.81; p = 0.05), whereas the differences on capacity of upper limb in Wolf Motor Function Test-Performance Time (MD = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.01-0.94; p = 0.04) and activities of daily living in the Functional Independence Measure were also observed (MD = 2.21; 95% CI, 0.12-4.31; p = 0.04). However, no significant differences were found in the analysis of activity levels in the ICF domains (SMD = 0.50; 95% CI, -1.33-2.34; p = 0.08). Subgroup analyses showed significant improvements in motor function in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment when partial substitution of RAT-UL with other high-intensity therapeutic approaches (MD = 3.42; 95% CI, 0.61-6.24; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adding a high-intensity therapeutic approach to RAT-UL may lead to improvement in upper limb function and capacity compared with RAT-UL alone. However, the effectiveness of combining RAT-UL with other therapeutic approaches appears to vary depending on the type of adjunctive therapy employed. The effect sizes were small, and the findings across studies were inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42023422583).</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 3","pages":"e70091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Robotic-assisted therapy for the upper limb (RAT-UL) is a well-established, evidence-based approach to stroke rehabilitation. However, the effectiveness of combining RAT-UL with other therapeutic approaches remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023422583), aimed to investigate the effect of combination therapy added to RAT-UL compared with RAT-UL alone on improving the motor function, and capacity of the affected upper limb and activity of daily living.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English before October 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. The primary inclusion criteria encompassed adults after stroke who underwent combining RAT-UL with other therapeutic approaches.
Results: After reviewing 5669 studies, we included 16 RCTs in this study. The overall effect of combining RAT-UL with other therapeutic approaches on the motor function in Fugl-Meyer Assessment was not significant improvement (MD = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.00-2.81; p = 0.05), whereas the differences on capacity of upper limb in Wolf Motor Function Test-Performance Time (MD = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.01-0.94; p = 0.04) and activities of daily living in the Functional Independence Measure were also observed (MD = 2.21; 95% CI, 0.12-4.31; p = 0.04). However, no significant differences were found in the analysis of activity levels in the ICF domains (SMD = 0.50; 95% CI, -1.33-2.34; p = 0.08). Subgroup analyses showed significant improvements in motor function in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment when partial substitution of RAT-UL with other high-intensity therapeutic approaches (MD = 3.42; 95% CI, 0.61-6.24; p = 0.02).
Discussion: Adding a high-intensity therapeutic approach to RAT-UL may lead to improvement in upper limb function and capacity compared with RAT-UL alone. However, the effectiveness of combining RAT-UL with other therapeutic approaches appears to vary depending on the type of adjunctive therapy employed. The effect sizes were small, and the findings across studies were inconsistent.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.