Struggling to be heard: A scoping review of user participation in ADHD mental healthcare for children and adolescents.

IF 1 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Elin Håkonsen Martinsen, Nina Helen Mjøsund, Anne Faugli
{"title":"Struggling to be heard: A scoping review of user participation in ADHD mental healthcare for children and adolescents.","authors":"Elin Håkonsen Martinsen, Nina Helen Mjøsund, Anne Faugli","doi":"10.2478/sjcapp-2025-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growing emphasis is placed on supporting children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in participating in their own healthcare; however, more knowledge is needed to guide practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the scientific literature on user participation and opportunities for shared decision-making involving younger people referred for ADHD in mental healthcare services, to provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic scoping review was performed. Eligibility was determined in two steps by two and three independent researchers, respectively. Data were extracted and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The findings were synthesized across the various contexts and participation groups represented in the included studies. In all, the analysis involved three phases: preparation, organization, and reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the thirty full-text papers identified, five met the inclusion criteria. Four categories and seven subcategories related to user participation and opportunities for shared decision-making involving children and adolescents with ADHD were identified. The four categories were: (1) sidelined from the start, (2) lack of information, (3) trapped in medication, and (4) growing into active decision-makers; these indicate that children with ADHD feel excluded from the diagnostic process, may have limited treatment choices, and may not be heard. This review also discovers a bias in the existing literature on user participation, with a tendency to emphasize caregivers' or clinicians' perspectives over those of the young people.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Young people with ADHD experience they have limited opportunities to participate in their mental healthcare services. User participation and shared decision-making by young people with ADHD should be promoted in clinical practice. Accordingly, future research should explore ways to implement user participation among young people themselves when assessing and treating ADHD, not only among clinicians and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"68-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjcapp-2025-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Growing emphasis is placed on supporting children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in participating in their own healthcare; however, more knowledge is needed to guide practice.

Objective: To review the scientific literature on user participation and opportunities for shared decision-making involving younger people referred for ADHD in mental healthcare services, to provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research.

Method: A systematic scoping review was performed. Eligibility was determined in two steps by two and three independent researchers, respectively. Data were extracted and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The findings were synthesized across the various contexts and participation groups represented in the included studies. In all, the analysis involved three phases: preparation, organization, and reporting.

Results: Of the thirty full-text papers identified, five met the inclusion criteria. Four categories and seven subcategories related to user participation and opportunities for shared decision-making involving children and adolescents with ADHD were identified. The four categories were: (1) sidelined from the start, (2) lack of information, (3) trapped in medication, and (4) growing into active decision-makers; these indicate that children with ADHD feel excluded from the diagnostic process, may have limited treatment choices, and may not be heard. This review also discovers a bias in the existing literature on user participation, with a tendency to emphasize caregivers' or clinicians' perspectives over those of the young people.

Conclusions: Young people with ADHD experience they have limited opportunities to participate in their mental healthcare services. User participation and shared decision-making by young people with ADHD should be promoted in clinical practice. Accordingly, future research should explore ways to implement user participation among young people themselves when assessing and treating ADHD, not only among clinicians and caregivers.

挣扎着被听到:儿童和青少年ADHD心理保健用户参与的范围审查。
背景:越来越多的人强调支持患有注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童和青少年参与自己的医疗保健;然而,需要更多的知识来指导实践。目的:回顾有关青少年ADHD患者在精神卫生服务中的用户参与和共同决策机会的科学文献,为临床实践和未来的研究提供建议。方法:进行系统的范围审查。资格由两名和三名独立研究人员分别分两步确定。提取资料,采用定性内容分析法进行分析。研究结果综合了纳入研究的不同背景和参与群体。总的来说,分析包括三个阶段:准备、组织和报告。结果:30篇全文论文中,5篇符合纳入标准。确定了涉及ADHD儿童和青少年的用户参与和共同决策机会的四个类别和七个子类别。这四种类型分别是:(1)从一开始就被边缘化;(2)缺乏信息;(3)被药物困住;(4)成长为积极的决策者;这些表明患有多动症的儿童感觉被排除在诊断过程之外,可能有有限的治疗选择,并且可能没有被倾听。本综述还发现,现有文献中存在用户参与的偏见,倾向于强调照顾者或临床医生的观点,而不是年轻人的观点。结论:患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的年轻人参与精神卫生保健服务的机会有限。在临床实践中应促进青少年ADHD患者的用户参与和共同决策。因此,未来的研究应该探索在评估和治疗ADHD时,让年轻人自己参与的方法,而不仅仅是临床医生和护理人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信