Panagiotis Lainas, Radwan Kassir, Evangelia Triantafyllou, Carmelisa Dammaro, Maissa Safieddine, Niaz Devaquet, Ibrahim Dagher
{"title":"Evaluation of complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.","authors":"Panagiotis Lainas, Radwan Kassir, Evangelia Triantafyllou, Carmelisa Dammaro, Maissa Safieddine, Niaz Devaquet, Ibrahim Dagher","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02326-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two feared complications of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are bleeding and gastric staple line leak. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement to minimize surgical complications in patients undergoing LSG. Data from consecutive patients undergoing LSG were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) complete staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement with standardized perioperative arterial hypertension control; ii) absence of reinforcement with standardized perioperative arterial hypertension control. A propensity score adjustment was performed on factors known to influence LSG postoperative complications. Four hundred thirty-nine patients were matched in each group, with similar preoperative data between groups. Mean operative time significantly decreased when reinforcement was used (84 vs. 104 min; p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was similar. Postoperative bleeding was noted in 17 patients (3.9%) in the no-reinforcement group vs. none in the reinforcement group (p < 0.001). Gastric staple line leak decreased in the reinforcement group (1.4% vs 3.4%), without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.07). Reoperation was required for two patients (0.4%) in the reinforcement group vs. 24 patients (5.4%) in the no-reinforcement group (p < 0.001). Mean length of hospital stay significantly decreased in the reinforcement group (p = 0.044). Complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement coupled to perioperative arterial hypertension control leads to significant decrease of bleeding, reoperation rate, and length of hospital stay, as well as non-significant reduction of gastric staple line leak rates in patients with severe obesity undergoing LSG.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02326-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Two feared complications of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are bleeding and gastric staple line leak. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement to minimize surgical complications in patients undergoing LSG. Data from consecutive patients undergoing LSG were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) complete staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement with standardized perioperative arterial hypertension control; ii) absence of reinforcement with standardized perioperative arterial hypertension control. A propensity score adjustment was performed on factors known to influence LSG postoperative complications. Four hundred thirty-nine patients were matched in each group, with similar preoperative data between groups. Mean operative time significantly decreased when reinforcement was used (84 vs. 104 min; p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was similar. Postoperative bleeding was noted in 17 patients (3.9%) in the no-reinforcement group vs. none in the reinforcement group (p < 0.001). Gastric staple line leak decreased in the reinforcement group (1.4% vs 3.4%), without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.07). Reoperation was required for two patients (0.4%) in the reinforcement group vs. 24 patients (5.4%) in the no-reinforcement group (p < 0.001). Mean length of hospital stay significantly decreased in the reinforcement group (p = 0.044). Complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement coupled to perioperative arterial hypertension control leads to significant decrease of bleeding, reoperation rate, and length of hospital stay, as well as non-significant reduction of gastric staple line leak rates in patients with severe obesity undergoing LSG.
腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)常见的两大并发症是出血和胃钉线漏出。本研究的目的是评估全胃钉线生物吸收增强剂的安全性和有效性,以减少LSG患者的手术并发症。前瞻性收集连续行LSG患者的资料并进行回顾性分析。患者分为两组:(i)全钉线生物吸收强化,围手术期动脉高血压控制标准化;Ii)缺乏标准化围手术期动脉高血压控制的强化。对已知影响LSG术后并发症的因素进行倾向评分调整。每组439例患者匹配,组间术前数据相似。加固组的平均手术时间显著缩短(84 vs 104 min;p
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.