Comparison of Apixaban With Warfarin in Patients on Dialysis Within an Integrated Health Care System.

Q2 Social Sciences
Tariq Shaheed, Douglas Stram, Aida Shirazi, Sumie Iwasaki, Cynthia Davila, Sijie Zheng
{"title":"Comparison of Apixaban With Warfarin in Patients on Dialysis Within an Integrated Health Care System.","authors":"Tariq Shaheed, Douglas Stram, Aida Shirazi, Sumie Iwasaki, Cynthia Davila, Sijie Zheng","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The risk and benefit for patients on dialysis receiving anticoagulation (AC) therapy have not been clearly established. This study aimed to compare the rates of clinically significant thrombotic and bleeding events in patients on dialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study conducted using Kaiser Permanente Northern California's electronic medical record database from 2013 to 2021. Patients over 18 years old on dialysis who were prescribed warfarin or apixaban were included. Patients with mechanical valves were excluded. The outcomes were analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables, χ<sup>2</sup> tests for categorical variables, and Kaplan-Meier method for time-to-event analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study period, 9832 patients were not on AC, and 2088 were taking apixaban or warfarin. The baseline demographics (age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sex) were comparable between apixaban and warfarin groups. Among the patients on anticoagulants, 181 were taking apixaban, while 1907 were taking only warfarin. The outcomes 1-3 years within the study period showed that the rates of clinically significant bleeding and thrombosis were comparable in both groups, with the exception of the rate of dialysis access thrombosis being lower in the apixaban group (7% vs 17%, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this diverse cohort, apixaban and warfarin showed no clinically significant differences in bleeding rates and lower rate of access thrombosis with apixaban. This study adds to the growing data of AC in the population with end-stage kidney disease, highlighting the need to enroll patients in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial to inform future practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/25.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The risk and benefit for patients on dialysis receiving anticoagulation (AC) therapy have not been clearly established. This study aimed to compare the rates of clinically significant thrombotic and bleeding events in patients on dialysis.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted using Kaiser Permanente Northern California's electronic medical record database from 2013 to 2021. Patients over 18 years old on dialysis who were prescribed warfarin or apixaban were included. Patients with mechanical valves were excluded. The outcomes were analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables, χ2 tests for categorical variables, and Kaplan-Meier method for time-to-event analysis.

Results: In the study period, 9832 patients were not on AC, and 2088 were taking apixaban or warfarin. The baseline demographics (age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sex) were comparable between apixaban and warfarin groups. Among the patients on anticoagulants, 181 were taking apixaban, while 1907 were taking only warfarin. The outcomes 1-3 years within the study period showed that the rates of clinically significant bleeding and thrombosis were comparable in both groups, with the exception of the rate of dialysis access thrombosis being lower in the apixaban group (7% vs 17%, P < .001).

Conclusion: In this diverse cohort, apixaban and warfarin showed no clinically significant differences in bleeding rates and lower rate of access thrombosis with apixaban. This study adds to the growing data of AC in the population with end-stage kidney disease, highlighting the need to enroll patients in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial to inform future practice.

阿哌沙班与华法林在综合医疗系统透析患者中的比较。
透析患者接受抗凝(AC)治疗的风险和获益尚未明确确定。本研究旨在比较透析患者临床显著血栓形成和出血事件的发生率。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用Kaiser Permanente北加州的电子病历数据库,时间为2013年至2021年。18岁以上的透析患者使用华法林或阿哌沙班。排除机械瓣膜患者。对连续变量采用Mann-Whitney检验,对分类变量采用χ2检验,对事件时间分析采用Kaplan-Meier法。结果:研究期间,9832例患者未使用AC, 2088例患者正在使用阿哌沙班或华法林。阿哌沙班组和华法林组的基线人口统计数据(年龄、Charlson合并症指数和性别)具有可比性。在使用抗凝药物的患者中,181例使用阿哌沙班,而1907例仅使用华法林。研究期间1-3年的结果显示,两组的临床显著性出血和血栓发生率相当,阿哌沙班组的透析通路血栓发生率较低(7% vs 17%, P < 0.001)。结论:在这个多样化的队列中,阿哌沙班和华法林在阿哌沙班治疗的出血率和较低的通路血栓发生率方面没有临床显著差异。这项研究增加了终末期肾脏疾病人群中AC的数据,强调需要将患者纳入足够有力的随机对照试验,为未来的实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信