Robotic-assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of Image-based and Image-free Systems on Two-year Postoperative Complications and Costs.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Farideh Najafi, George N Guild, Mary Jane McConnell, Bailey J Ross, Charles A DeCook, Brandon H Naylor, Thomas L Bradbury
{"title":"Robotic-assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of Image-based and Image-free Systems on Two-year Postoperative Complications and Costs.","authors":"Farideh Najafi, George N Guild, Mary Jane McConnell, Bailey J Ross, Charles A DeCook, Brandon H Naylor, Thomas L Bradbury","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250702-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an increasingly popular surgical option, constituting approximately 10% of knee arthroplasty operations, with an anticipated upward trend. However, UKA presents technical challenges and higher revision rates compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluates the outcomes and economic implications of using two robotic systems for UKA: the image-based (IBRA-UKA) and image-free (IFRA-UKA) robotic-assisted systems. We hypothesized that the image-free system, while incurring lower costs, would demonstrate clinical outcomes comparable to the image-based system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study using the PearlDiver™ Database, selecting patients older than 40 years without previous knee surgeries who underwent robotic-assisted UKA (RA-UKA). Individuals with contralateral knee arthroplasty within 2 years were excluded. The procedures were divided into two cohorts, matched one-to-one for demographics and clinical characteristics. We compared 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative complications, along with cost analysis of preoperative computed tomography imaging and surgical expenses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,490 patients were evaluated, with 1,245 in each cohort. No statistical differences were observed in postoperative complications, including revision rates, between the two cohorts. However, preoperative and surgical costs were significantly higher for the IBRA-UKA cohort compared to the IFRA-UKA cohort. Preoperative computed tomography scan costs averaged $916±$1,092 versus $0 (<i>P</i><0.001), and surgical costs averaged $5,675±$9,436 versus $3,056±$5,419 (<i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The similar complication rates highlight the value of robotic technique in UKA regardless of system choice. However, the higher costs of IBRA-UKA raise financial concerns amid diminishing health care reimbursements. Further research is needed to evaluate robotic systems, focusing on intraoperative, postoperative, and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20250702-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an increasingly popular surgical option, constituting approximately 10% of knee arthroplasty operations, with an anticipated upward trend. However, UKA presents technical challenges and higher revision rates compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluates the outcomes and economic implications of using two robotic systems for UKA: the image-based (IBRA-UKA) and image-free (IFRA-UKA) robotic-assisted systems. We hypothesized that the image-free system, while incurring lower costs, would demonstrate clinical outcomes comparable to the image-based system.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study using the PearlDiver™ Database, selecting patients older than 40 years without previous knee surgeries who underwent robotic-assisted UKA (RA-UKA). Individuals with contralateral knee arthroplasty within 2 years were excluded. The procedures were divided into two cohorts, matched one-to-one for demographics and clinical characteristics. We compared 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative complications, along with cost analysis of preoperative computed tomography imaging and surgical expenses.

Results: A total of 2,490 patients were evaluated, with 1,245 in each cohort. No statistical differences were observed in postoperative complications, including revision rates, between the two cohorts. However, preoperative and surgical costs were significantly higher for the IBRA-UKA cohort compared to the IFRA-UKA cohort. Preoperative computed tomography scan costs averaged $916±$1,092 versus $0 (P<0.001), and surgical costs averaged $5,675±$9,436 versus $3,056±$5,419 (P<0.001).

Conclusion: The similar complication rates highlight the value of robotic technique in UKA regardless of system choice. However, the higher costs of IBRA-UKA raise financial concerns amid diminishing health care reimbursements. Further research is needed to evaluate robotic systems, focusing on intraoperative, postoperative, and functional outcomes.

机器人辅助的单室膝关节置换术:基于图像和无图像系统对两年术后并发症和成本的比较研究。
背景:单室膝关节置换术(UKA)是一种日益流行的手术选择,约占膝关节置换术手术的10%,并有上升趋势。然而,与全膝关节置换术(TKA)相比,UKA存在技术挑战和更高的翻修率。本研究评估了使用两种机器人系统进行UKA的结果和经济意义:基于图像的(IBRA-UKA)和无图像的(IFRA-UKA)机器人辅助系统。我们假设无图像系统虽然成本较低,但其临床效果与基于图像的系统相当。材料和方法:我们使用PearlDiver™数据库进行了一项回顾性研究,选择了年龄大于40岁且未做过膝关节手术的患者,他们接受了机器人辅助UKA (RA-UKA)。排除2年内行对侧膝关节置换术的个体。这些程序被分为两个队列,根据人口统计学和临床特征进行一对一匹配。我们比较了术后90天、1年和2年的并发症,以及术前计算机断层成像和手术费用的成本分析。结果:共有2490例患者被评估,每组1245例。两组患者在术后并发症(包括翻修率)方面无统计学差异。然而,IBRA-UKA组的术前和手术费用明显高于IFRA-UKA组。术前计算机断层扫描费用平均为916±1092美元,而ppp为0美元。结论:相似的并发症发生率突出了机器人技术在UKA中的价值,无论系统选择如何。然而,在医疗报销减少的情况下,IBRA-UKA的高成本引发了财务担忧。需要进一步的研究来评估机器人系统,重点关注术中、术后和功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信