Design of a Novel Artificial Atlanto-Odontoid Joint and Its Anatomical and Radiological Studies Following Transoral Pharyngeal Approach Arthroplasty.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1111/os.70088
Shengguang Lei, Lingyong Jing, Xijiong Chen, Zhiwei Gan, Jianbin Zhong, Liming Yu, Yong Hu
{"title":"Design of a Novel Artificial Atlanto-Odontoid Joint and Its Anatomical and Radiological Studies Following Transoral Pharyngeal Approach Arthroplasty.","authors":"Shengguang Lei, Lingyong Jing, Xijiong Chen, Zhiwei Gan, Jianbin Zhong, Liming Yu, Yong Hu","doi":"10.1111/os.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>For atlantoaxial joint disorders, traditional surgical approaches often presented challenges such as significant trauma and prolonged recovery. Therefore, it was crucial to explore safer and more effective surgical alternatives. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical safety and feasibility of artificial atlanto-odontoid joint (AAOJ) replacement via a transoral pharyngeal approach, through simulated surgical procedures and postoperative anatomical and radiological studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The novel AAOJ replacement surgery was simulated on 18 fresh adult cadaveric head and neck specimens, and relevant anatomical parameters were measured. Postoperatively, the specimens underwent X-ray and CT scans, and software was used to measure the relevant parameters of the fixation screws. The spatial relationships between the atlantoaxial components, fixation screws, and critical anatomical structures were also examined. The comparison of parameters between the left and right sides was conducted using paired-sample t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The transoral pharyngeal approach provided adequate exposure, clear surgical visualization, and sufficient working space. Anatomical measurements showed that the width of the anterior arch bone window of the atlas was (13.8 ± 0.7) mm; the width of the vertebral body bone window of the axis was (11.0 ± 0.4) mm; the distance between the insertion points for the atlas screws was (28.2 ± 4.0) mm; the distance from the atlas insertion points to the lateral joint edge of the atlanto-axial joint was (5.2 ± 0.9) mm; the distance between the insertion points for the axis screws was (16.8 ± 1.6) mm; and the distance from the axis insertion points to the lateral joint edge of the atlanto-axial joint was (7.7 ± 0.9) mm. Radiological measurements showed that the screw trajectory length of the lateral mass screw in the atlas was (21.5 ± 2.8) mm, the outward insertion angle was (13.2 ± 2.5)°, and the caudal insertion angle was (3.5 ± 1.1)°; for the pedicle screw of the axis, the screw trajectory length was (29.8 ± 2.8) mm, the outward insertion angle was (20.7 ± 2.8)°, and the caudal insertion angle was (16.6 ± 2.7)°. The prosthesis was precisely fitted to the upper cervical spine, with adequate safety distances between the atlantoaxial components, fixation screws, and critical anatomical structures such as the foramen transversarium, vertebral artery groove, and spinal canal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The transoral pharyngeal approach for novel AAOJ replacement is anatomically safe and feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2670-2679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: For atlantoaxial joint disorders, traditional surgical approaches often presented challenges such as significant trauma and prolonged recovery. Therefore, it was crucial to explore safer and more effective surgical alternatives. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical safety and feasibility of artificial atlanto-odontoid joint (AAOJ) replacement via a transoral pharyngeal approach, through simulated surgical procedures and postoperative anatomical and radiological studies.

Methods: The novel AAOJ replacement surgery was simulated on 18 fresh adult cadaveric head and neck specimens, and relevant anatomical parameters were measured. Postoperatively, the specimens underwent X-ray and CT scans, and software was used to measure the relevant parameters of the fixation screws. The spatial relationships between the atlantoaxial components, fixation screws, and critical anatomical structures were also examined. The comparison of parameters between the left and right sides was conducted using paired-sample t-tests.

Results: The transoral pharyngeal approach provided adequate exposure, clear surgical visualization, and sufficient working space. Anatomical measurements showed that the width of the anterior arch bone window of the atlas was (13.8 ± 0.7) mm; the width of the vertebral body bone window of the axis was (11.0 ± 0.4) mm; the distance between the insertion points for the atlas screws was (28.2 ± 4.0) mm; the distance from the atlas insertion points to the lateral joint edge of the atlanto-axial joint was (5.2 ± 0.9) mm; the distance between the insertion points for the axis screws was (16.8 ± 1.6) mm; and the distance from the axis insertion points to the lateral joint edge of the atlanto-axial joint was (7.7 ± 0.9) mm. Radiological measurements showed that the screw trajectory length of the lateral mass screw in the atlas was (21.5 ± 2.8) mm, the outward insertion angle was (13.2 ± 2.5)°, and the caudal insertion angle was (3.5 ± 1.1)°; for the pedicle screw of the axis, the screw trajectory length was (29.8 ± 2.8) mm, the outward insertion angle was (20.7 ± 2.8)°, and the caudal insertion angle was (16.6 ± 2.7)°. The prosthesis was precisely fitted to the upper cervical spine, with adequate safety distances between the atlantoaxial components, fixation screws, and critical anatomical structures such as the foramen transversarium, vertebral artery groove, and spinal canal.

Conclusions: The transoral pharyngeal approach for novel AAOJ replacement is anatomically safe and feasible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种新型人工寰齿-齿状关节的设计及其经口咽入路关节成形术后的解剖学和放射学研究。
目的:对于寰枢关节疾病,传统的手术方式往往面临着创伤大、恢复时间长等挑战。因此,探索更安全、更有效的手术选择至关重要。本研究的主要目的是通过模拟外科手术和术后解剖学和放射学研究,探讨经口咽入路人工寰齿状关节(AAOJ)置换术的解剖学安全性和可行性。方法:在18例新鲜成人头颈部标本上模拟新型AAOJ置换手术,并测量相关解剖参数。术后对标本进行x线和CT扫描,并用软件测量固定螺钉的相关参数。我们还研究了寰枢椎各部件、固定螺钉和关键解剖结构之间的空间关系。左右两侧的参数比较采用配对样本t检验。结果:经口咽入路显露充分,手术视野清晰,工作空间充足。解剖测量显示寰椎前弓骨窗宽度为(13.8±0.7)mm;椎体骨窗轴线宽度为(11.0±0.4)mm;寰椎螺钉插入点间距为(28.2±4.0)mm;寰枢关节插入点到寰枢关节外侧关节边缘的距离为(5.2±0.9)mm;轴向螺钉插入点间距为(16.8±1.6)mm;轴向插入点到寰枢关节外侧关节边缘的距离为(7.7±0.9)mm。放射学测量显示寰枢侧块螺钉的螺钉轨迹长度为(21.5±2.8)mm,向外插入角为(13.2±2.5)°,尾侧插入角为(3.5±1.1)°;轴向椎弓根螺钉,螺钉轨迹长度为(29.8±2.8)mm,向外插入角为(20.7±2.8)°,尾侧插入角为(16.6±2.7)°。假体精确地安装在上颈椎上,寰枢椎部件、固定螺钉和关键解剖结构(如横孔、椎动脉沟和椎管)之间有足够的安全距离。结论:经口咽入路用于新型AAOJ置换术在解剖学上是安全可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信