The Efficacy of Health Promotion Interventions for Mild Frailty Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yue Li, Jie Yun, Xie Cen, Liping Wang, Ruiting Yang, Danni Lu, Dianhe Liu
{"title":"The Efficacy of Health Promotion Interventions for Mild Frailty Older Adults: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yue Li, Jie Yun, Xie Cen, Liping Wang, Ruiting Yang, Danni Lu, Dianhe Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The growing population of prefrail older adults is increasingly becoming a priority in health care services within aging nations. This study was designed to assess the effect of health-promoting interventions on clinical efficacy in prefrail older adult populations and to undertake a preliminary exploration of their associated cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Prefrail older people ≥60 years of age who conform to 1 or 2 of the criteria within Fried's frailty phenotype, in any setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of 7 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang) was conducted from database inception through March 2025. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials investigating multidimensional health outcomes for older adults with prefrailty. Dual independent processes were implemented for both data extraction and methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 7 randomized controlled trials (N = 1323) with intervention periods spanning 3 to 26 months. Health promotion strategies comprised 3 main categories: multicomponent exercise, theory-driven approaches, and multidisciplinary interventions. Despite variations in outcome measurements, the study results preliminarily suggest that health-promoting interventions have demonstrated a certain degree of positive impact on both the health status and cost-effectiveness of prefrail older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Health promotion interventions can improve clinical outcome indicators for prefrail older adults and possess potential advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness. However, the benefits largely depend on the type and duration of the intervention. When assessing these factors together, home-based health promotion interventions seem to be a particularly beneficial strategy, offering both cost efficiency and meaningful improvements in prefrailty status.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105755"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The growing population of prefrail older adults is increasingly becoming a priority in health care services within aging nations. This study was designed to assess the effect of health-promoting interventions on clinical efficacy in prefrail older adult populations and to undertake a preliminary exploration of their associated cost-effectiveness.

Design: Systematic review.

Setting and participants: Prefrail older people ≥60 years of age who conform to 1 or 2 of the criteria within Fried's frailty phenotype, in any setting.

Methods: A comprehensive search of 7 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang) was conducted from database inception through March 2025. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials investigating multidimensional health outcomes for older adults with prefrailty. Dual independent processes were implemented for both data extraction and methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results: This review included 7 randomized controlled trials (N = 1323) with intervention periods spanning 3 to 26 months. Health promotion strategies comprised 3 main categories: multicomponent exercise, theory-driven approaches, and multidisciplinary interventions. Despite variations in outcome measurements, the study results preliminarily suggest that health-promoting interventions have demonstrated a certain degree of positive impact on both the health status and cost-effectiveness of prefrail older adults.

Conclusions and implications: Health promotion interventions can improve clinical outcome indicators for prefrail older adults and possess potential advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness. However, the benefits largely depend on the type and duration of the intervention. When assessing these factors together, home-based health promotion interventions seem to be a particularly beneficial strategy, offering both cost efficiency and meaningful improvements in prefrailty status.

健康促进干预对轻度虚弱老年人的效果:系统评价。
目标:日益增长的体弱老年人人口日益成为老龄化国家卫生保健服务的优先事项。本研究旨在评估健康促进干预对体弱老年人临床疗效的影响,并对其相关的成本效益进行初步探讨。设计:系统回顾。环境和参与者:≥60岁,在任何环境下符合弗里德虚弱表型1或2个标准的易衰老年人。方法:综合检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、CNKI、万方等7个数据库,检索时间为数据库建立至2025年3月。纳入标准包括随机对照试验,调查老年易感者的多维健康结果。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具对数据提取和方法学质量进行双重独立评估。结果:本综述纳入7项随机对照试验(N = 1323),干预期为3至26个月。健康促进策略包括三大类:多组分运动、理论驱动方法和多学科干预。尽管结果测量存在差异,但研究结果初步表明,健康促进干预措施对体弱前老年人的健康状况和成本效益都有一定程度的积极影响。结论和意义:健康促进干预可以改善老年体弱前期患者的临床结局指标,在成本效益方面具有潜在优势。然而,益处很大程度上取决于干预的类型和持续时间。在综合评估这些因素时,以家庭为基础的健康促进干预措施似乎是一种特别有益的战略,既具有成本效益,又能有效改善易感状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信