Extending catchment area approaches to a community cancer center: a breast cancer hotspot case-study.

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Scott D Siegel, Yuchen Zhang, Ross Budziszewski, Atif Bacchus, Jennifer Rowland, Mary V Iacocca, Robert Hall-Mcbride, Frank C Curriero
{"title":"Extending catchment area approaches to a community cancer center: a breast cancer hotspot case-study.","authors":"Scott D Siegel, Yuchen Zhang, Ross Budziszewski, Atif Bacchus, Jennifer Rowland, Mary V Iacocca, Robert Hall-Mcbride, Frank C Curriero","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Cancer Institute (NCI) requires that NCI-Designated Cancer Centers develop programs to reduce the burden of cancer within their catchment areas, or the geographic area they serve. Extending catchment area approaches to community cancer centers has the potential to meaningfully reduce the burden of cancer nationwide. Building on a prior report that identified two advanced breast cancer (BC) hotspots (geographic areas with significantly elevated rates of BC) in a community cancer center catchment area, the objective of this study was to identify screening-related and tumor biology factors that explain the advanced BC hotspots.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Logistic regressions were used to model the relationship between BC screening interval and odds of advanced BC in a catchment area-based cohort of 3,492 breast cancer patients, adjusting for demographic and tumor characteristics. The observed to expected case ratios were used to evaluate how well the regression models explained the hotspots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In models adjusted for grade, molecular subtype, and histology, patients with inconsistent BC screening had more than twice the odds of advanced breast cancer as patients who screened regularly. The model largely explained one of the hotspots and approximately half of the excess cases observed for the second hotspot.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a community cancer center catchment area, BC screening and tumor biology were associated with increased odds of advanced BC and helped to explain previously detected hotspots. Specific community outreach and engagement interventions are considered for these hotspots while broader implications for extending catchment area approaches to community cancer centers are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) requires that NCI-Designated Cancer Centers develop programs to reduce the burden of cancer within their catchment areas, or the geographic area they serve. Extending catchment area approaches to community cancer centers has the potential to meaningfully reduce the burden of cancer nationwide. Building on a prior report that identified two advanced breast cancer (BC) hotspots (geographic areas with significantly elevated rates of BC) in a community cancer center catchment area, the objective of this study was to identify screening-related and tumor biology factors that explain the advanced BC hotspots.

Methods: Logistic regressions were used to model the relationship between BC screening interval and odds of advanced BC in a catchment area-based cohort of 3,492 breast cancer patients, adjusting for demographic and tumor characteristics. The observed to expected case ratios were used to evaluate how well the regression models explained the hotspots.

Results: In models adjusted for grade, molecular subtype, and histology, patients with inconsistent BC screening had more than twice the odds of advanced breast cancer as patients who screened regularly. The model largely explained one of the hotspots and approximately half of the excess cases observed for the second hotspot.

Conclusions: In a community cancer center catchment area, BC screening and tumor biology were associated with increased odds of advanced BC and helped to explain previously detected hotspots. Specific community outreach and engagement interventions are considered for these hotspots while broader implications for extending catchment area approaches to community cancer centers are discussed.

将集水区方法扩展到社区癌症中心:乳腺癌热点案例研究。
背景:美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)要求NCI指定的癌症中心制定计划,以减少其集水区或其服务的地理区域内的癌症负担。将集水区方法扩展到社区癌症中心有可能在全国范围内有效地减轻癌症负担。在先前的一份报告的基础上,该报告确定了社区癌症中心集水区的两个晚期乳腺癌(BC)热点(BC发病率显著升高的地理区域),本研究的目的是确定解释晚期BC热点的筛查相关因素和肿瘤生物学因素。方法:采用Logistic回归模型对3492例集水区乳腺癌患者的BC筛查间隔和晚期BC几率之间的关系进行建模,并根据人口统计学和肿瘤特征进行调整。观察到的与预期的病例比率被用来评估回归模型解释热点的程度。结果:在对分级、分子亚型和组织学进行调整的模型中,不一致BC筛查的患者患晚期乳腺癌的几率是定期筛查患者的两倍多。该模型在很大程度上解释了其中一个热点和第二个热点观测到的大约一半的超额情况。结论:在社区癌症中心集水区,BC筛查和肿瘤生物学与晚期BC的几率增加有关,并有助于解释先前检测到的热点。具体的社区外展和参与干预措施考虑了这些热点,同时更广泛的影响,扩大流域地区的方法,以社区癌症中心进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信