Outcomes and measures in studies of techniques to promote secretion clearance in individuals with neuromuscular conditions: a scoping review.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-07-21 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.01007-2024
Neeraj M Shah, Chloe Apps, Reshma Amin, Georgios Kaltsakas, Nicholas Hart, Patrick B Murphy, Louise Rose
{"title":"Outcomes and measures in studies of techniques to promote secretion clearance in individuals with neuromuscular conditions: a scoping review.","authors":"Neeraj M Shah, Chloe Apps, Reshma Amin, Georgios Kaltsakas, Nicholas Hart, Patrick B Murphy, Louise Rose","doi":"10.1183/23120541.01007-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Techniques to support secretion clearance for individuals with neuromuscular conditions and respiratory muscle weakness include mechanical insufflation-exsufflation and chest wall vibrations. Assessing the comparative efficacy of these techniques is challenging due to the absence of a core outcome set. We sought to describe outcomes and measurement instruments reported in studies of airway clearance techniques for individuals with neuromuscular conditions living in the community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of primary research studies. We searched six databases from inception to 22 February 2024. Two reviewers independently screened citations against the inclusion criteria and extracted data on outcomes and measurement characteristics. Outcomes were categorised according to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) 38-domain taxonomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 75 eligible studies describing 55 outcomes. We grouped outcomes deemed overlapping and categorised them using the COMET 38-domain taxonomy, resulting in 34 distinct outcomes. Common physiological/clinical outcomes were cough strength (n=48 studies, 64%), lung volume (n=48, 64%) and insufflation capacity (n=22, 29%). The most common measurement tools for these outcomes were spirometer (n=38, 51%), peak flow meter (n=24, 32%) and pneumotachograph (n=20, 27%). The most common resource-use outcome was hospitalisation due to respiratory illness (n=13, 17%). Few studies reported on life impact outcomes, with the most common being comfort (n=6, 8%) and patient satisfaction (n=4, 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified 34 outcomes from 75 studies, which were most commonly physiological/clinical, with resource-use and life impact outcomes being seldom reported. The number and range of outcomes and measures demonstrates the need for a core outcome set.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01007-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Techniques to support secretion clearance for individuals with neuromuscular conditions and respiratory muscle weakness include mechanical insufflation-exsufflation and chest wall vibrations. Assessing the comparative efficacy of these techniques is challenging due to the absence of a core outcome set. We sought to describe outcomes and measurement instruments reported in studies of airway clearance techniques for individuals with neuromuscular conditions living in the community.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of primary research studies. We searched six databases from inception to 22 February 2024. Two reviewers independently screened citations against the inclusion criteria and extracted data on outcomes and measurement characteristics. Outcomes were categorised according to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) 38-domain taxonomy.

Results: We identified 75 eligible studies describing 55 outcomes. We grouped outcomes deemed overlapping and categorised them using the COMET 38-domain taxonomy, resulting in 34 distinct outcomes. Common physiological/clinical outcomes were cough strength (n=48 studies, 64%), lung volume (n=48, 64%) and insufflation capacity (n=22, 29%). The most common measurement tools for these outcomes were spirometer (n=38, 51%), peak flow meter (n=24, 32%) and pneumotachograph (n=20, 27%). The most common resource-use outcome was hospitalisation due to respiratory illness (n=13, 17%). Few studies reported on life impact outcomes, with the most common being comfort (n=6, 8%) and patient satisfaction (n=4, 5%).

Conclusion: We identified 34 outcomes from 75 studies, which were most commonly physiological/clinical, with resource-use and life impact outcomes being seldom reported. The number and range of outcomes and measures demonstrates the need for a core outcome set.

Abstract Image

促进神经肌肉疾病患者分泌物清除技术研究的结果和措施:范围综述。
背景:支持神经肌肉疾病和呼吸肌无力患者分泌物清除的技术包括机械吸气-呼气和胸壁振动。由于缺乏核心结果集,评估这些技术的相对疗效具有挑战性。我们试图描述在社区生活的神经肌肉疾病患者的气道清除技术研究中报告的结果和测量仪器。方法:我们对初步研究进行了范围综述。我们检索了六个数据库,从成立到2024年2月22日。两名审稿人根据纳入标准独立筛选引文,并提取结果和测量特征的数据。根据有效性试验的核心结果测量(COMET) 38域分类法对结果进行分类。结果:我们确定了75项符合条件的研究,描述了55个结果。我们将认为重叠的结果分组,并使用COMET 38域分类法对它们进行分类,得到34个不同的结果。常见的生理/临床结果是咳嗽强度(n=48, 64%)、肺容量(n=48, 64%)和充气能力(n=22, 29%)。这些结果最常见的测量工具是肺活量计(n=38, 51%)、峰值流量计(n=24, 32%)和肺记录仪(n=20, 27%)。最常见的资源使用结果是因呼吸系统疾病住院(n= 13.17%)。很少有研究报告生活影响结果,最常见的是舒适度(n= 6,8%)和患者满意度(n= 4,5%)。结论:我们从75项研究中确定了34项结果,其中最常见的是生理/临床结果,资源利用和生命影响结果很少被报道。结果和措施的数量和范围表明需要一套核心结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信