“Parental alienation” cases: Experiences of Ontario legal and mental health professionals

IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Rachel Birnbaum, Nicholas Bala
{"title":"“Parental alienation” cases: Experiences of Ontario legal and mental health professionals","authors":"Rachel Birnbaum,&nbsp;Nicholas Bala","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper reports on two related studies on the experiences of Ontario therapists, parenting evaluators, child protection service (CPS) staff, and lawyers for parents, children and CPS about parent–child contact problem cases involving claims of parental alienation. One qualitative study was based on interviews with 62 professionals (45 parents' lawyers and 17 therapists) involved in reported Ontario cases between 2010 and 2022 where the court made a finding of parental alienation. The second qualitative study was based on nine focus groups with 50 Ontario professionals (31 children's lawyers, four CPS lawyers, five CPS workers and 10 parenting evaluators) about their experiences with this type of high conflict separation case. The majority of professionals in both studies found that parents in these cases are often very challenging clients. The professionals shared their frustration that the family justice system is slow to respond and has few effective legal responses or clinical resources that can provide appropriate services for these cases. The studies highlight the complexity of these cases and the need for the family justice system to better provide coordinated legal and clinical responses for these families. There is a need for more evidence-based collaborative interdisciplinary practice, research and professional education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 3","pages":"491-515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports on two related studies on the experiences of Ontario therapists, parenting evaluators, child protection service (CPS) staff, and lawyers for parents, children and CPS about parent–child contact problem cases involving claims of parental alienation. One qualitative study was based on interviews with 62 professionals (45 parents' lawyers and 17 therapists) involved in reported Ontario cases between 2010 and 2022 where the court made a finding of parental alienation. The second qualitative study was based on nine focus groups with 50 Ontario professionals (31 children's lawyers, four CPS lawyers, five CPS workers and 10 parenting evaluators) about their experiences with this type of high conflict separation case. The majority of professionals in both studies found that parents in these cases are often very challenging clients. The professionals shared their frustration that the family justice system is slow to respond and has few effective legal responses or clinical resources that can provide appropriate services for these cases. The studies highlight the complexity of these cases and the need for the family justice system to better provide coordinated legal and clinical responses for these families. There is a need for more evidence-based collaborative interdisciplinary practice, research and professional education.

“父母疏离”案例:安大略省法律和心理健康专业人员的经验
本文报道了两项相关的研究,研究了安大略省治疗师、育儿评估员、儿童保护服务(CPS)工作人员以及代表家长、儿童和CPS的律师在涉及父母疏远索赔的亲子接触问题案件中的经验。一项定性研究基于对62名专业人士(45名家长律师和17名治疗师)的采访,这些专业人士参与了2010年至2022年安大略省报告的案件,法院在这些案件中发现了父母疏远。第二项定性研究基于9个焦点小组,包括50名安大略省专业人士(31名儿童律师,4名CPS律师,5名CPS工作人员和10名育儿评估员),了解他们在这类高冲突分离案件中的经历。两项研究中的大多数专业人士都发现,在这些情况下,父母往往是非常具有挑战性的客户。专业人员分享了他们对家庭司法系统反应迟缓的失望,并且几乎没有有效的法律反应或临床资源,可以为这些案件提供适当的服务。这些研究强调了这些案件的复杂性,以及家庭司法系统需要更好地为这些家庭提供协调一致的法律和临床反应。我们需要更多基于证据的跨学科合作实践、研究和专业教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信